Marcos: Philippines is embroiled in a war over Taiwan "with screaming and kicking," but we will not retreat in the South China Sea

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. issued a harsh statement on Monday, warning that his country would inevitably be drawn into a military conflict over Taiwan, even if it "resisted with screams and kicks." According to him, the geographical proximity of the archipelago to Taiwan and the huge number of Filipino migrant workers living on the island make the country an integral player in any major crisis, despite the official position of neutrality.

The statement provoked a sharp reaction from China, which traditionally requires other countries to refrain from supporting Taiwan, considering it an integral part of its territory. Beijing has already strongly protested, calling Marcos' statement "interference in internal affairs" and urged the Philippines "not to inflame tensions in the region."

However, Marcos did not stop there. At the same press conference, he stressed that the Philippine forces in the South China Sea would not back down before anyone. "Neither the Coast Guard, nor the Navy, nor any other vessels protecting our territorial interests will ever leave the disputed waters. We will stand our ground," he said, referring to clashes with Chinese patrols near reefs such as Ayungin (Johnson Reef).

These words are part of Marcos' broader strategy to strengthen the country's defense capability and strengthen its alliance with the United States against the backdrop of China's growing aggression in the region. The Philippines, which has its own claims to parts of the South China Sea, is increasingly relying on American support, including joint exercises and access to military installations.

Thus, Marcos sends a double signal: to Beijing — that Manila will not remain silent, and to Washington — that the Philippines is ready to be the front line in the struggle for stability in the Indo-Pacific region.

Iran has threatened to attack the "Trump route" through Armenia due to the threat of security and isolation in the north

Iran has threatened to attack the so—called "Trump route", a transport corridor that connects the main territory of Azerbaijan with its exclave of Nakhichevan through the southern part of Armenia (Syunik region). Advisor to the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Akbar Velayati, said that Tehran opposes this route because its implementation endangers the security of the South Caucasus and the territorial integrity of Armenia. Velayati also stressed that Iran will do everything possible to block this corridor, "with or without Russia."

The Trump Route (officially called the TRIPP project — "Trump's Route for International Peace and Prosperity") In fact, it is the Zangezur Corridor, initiated by Azerbaijan and supported by the United States. The United States wants to obtain exclusive rights to develop and manage this transit corridor in Armenia for up to 99 years. This gives Washington strategic control over the transport link passing through Armenian territory, which causes outrage and concern in Iran, as the corridor is located along its northern border and may isolate Iran regionally in the north.

According to experts, this corridor will become not only an economic but also a military springboard for the United States in the South Caucasus, which increases geopolitical tensions in the region. Iran sees this as a threat to its interests, and also fears that the route will lead to increased influence of NATO and the United States near its borders.

Thus, Iran's threat to attack the "Trump route" is related to its attempts to prevent the strengthening of American and Azerbaijani control over the strategic transport corridor through Armenia, which Iran considers as a serious threat to its security and regional balance.

China is building an "underground city" for the army: satellites have captured a giant military bunker near Beijing

 

Satellite images have revealed a massive secret: China is actively building a giant underground military command center, and its size is truly staggering. The facility, estimated to cover 1,000 acres (about 4 square kilometers), is described as the largest such facility in the world since World War II. This "underground city" is located near Beijing and, apparently, is designed to withstand almost anything from a nuclear strike to prolonged isolation.

It's not just about a bunker, but about a whole complex capable of accommodating thousands of people and operating autonomously for a long time. Its creation is a clear signal that China is serious about ensuring its strategic stability and readiness for any, even the worst-case scenarios. This step forces the leading world powers to urgently review their security plans. In the context of growing geopolitical tensions in Asia, especially around Taiwan and the South China Sea, such a large-scale project speaks for itself: China is strengthening its position as a military and strategic giant.

China's railway against border conflicts: Is the war between Thailand and Cambodia not an accident?

The Asian media is increasingly thinking that the recent escalation between Thailand and Cambodia is not just a dispute over border lands, but part of a larger game. Many are beginning to assume that this conflict is an attempt to disrupt or at least slow down the Chinese megaproject Belt and Road, in particular, the construction of the pan—Asian railway, which should stretch for 6,000 kilometers through the entire Southeastern region.

This network is not just a road. This is a geopolitical breakthrough: it should connect China with Singapore, passing through Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Malaysia, providing Beijing with a direct and secure land corridor to the south Seas. And this is a huge economic and strategic benefit.

Something is already working: the China–Laos line has been launched and successfully transports passengers and cargo. The China–Thailand section is under construction at full capacity — the first stage, from Bangkok to Nakhon Ratchasima, is scheduled to open by early 2026. Everything is on schedule. But then there's the catch.

The next logical step is access to Cambodia: it is necessary to lay a branch line from Bangkok through Phnom Penh to Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam, and from there on to China. It was in this area, on the border of Thailand and Cambodia, that new military clashes broke out.

And it's not just a coincidence. Cambodia is a long—time ally of China. It actively accepts Chinese investments, military cooperation is growing, and Chinese ships are increasingly seen in the country's ports. Thailand, on the other hand, is a strategic partner of the United States in ASEAN, participates in joint exercises, buys American weapons and is still strongly influenced by Washington.

So it turns out: one is on the side of China, the other is in the orbit of the United States. And between them is the key transportation hub of the future railway.

Unsurprisingly, many analysts see this conflict not just as a territorial dispute, but as a geopolitical standoff over control of the infrastructure of the future. After all, if the railway goes through, China will strengthen its influence in the region, reduce its dependence on sea routes (like the Strait of Malacca) and get direct access to the Indian Ocean through Myanmar — a corridor was also planned there, but it is frozen due to the civil war.

So the escalation on the Thai—Cambodian border is probably not just a local incident, but part of a broader strategy:  to slow down Chinese expansion under the guise of a local conflict. And the Belt and Road railway is not just a project, but a battle for the future of Southeast Asia.

India faced three opponents during Operation Sindoor: China and Turkey supported Pakistan

During the recent Indian military operation called Sindur, the situation on the border escalated dramatically when India unexpectedly faced not only Pakistan, but also the indirect intervention of China and Turkey. According to intelligence sources, these two countries provided assistance to Pakistan, which significantly complicated the situation for the Indian armed forces. This event was a vivid reminder that regional security requires increased combat readiness and interagency coordination.

Operation Sindoor began against the backdrop of escalating border conflicts between India and Pakistan, which repeatedly occurred in 2025, including shootings in late April and missile attacks using drones in May. However, the involvement of China and Turkey in supporting Pakistan has become a new and dangerous element in this equation. Experts suggest that such a coalition against India may be linked to the increasing geopolitical pressure on the country from states interested in weakening its strategic position in South Asia.

The operation involved modern air defense systems, including the Russian S-400 Triumph, which proved highly effective in repelling Pakistan's missile strikes. In turn, India also retaliated against air defense systems and radars in Pakistan. However, reports that some of the targets had been lost, including the destruction of some equipment, caused concern among the military leadership.

The fact that China and Turkey are involved in military support for Pakistan is particularly important, as it points to the formation of new strategic alliances in the region. China, in particular, has long supported Pakistan in the military-technical sphere, supplying it with modern air defense systems such as the HQ-9, which creates additional difficulties for India.

Given the scale of the threat, experts recommend that India accelerate the modernization of its air defense system and develop closer military cooperation with other democratic powers in order to maintain a balance of power in the region.

Egypt plans to deploy Chinese HQ-9B air defense system: strategic turn to the East

 

Launch of the Chinese HQ-9B air defense system

According to sources, a former senior official of the country's armed forces said that Egypt intends to deploy the Chinese HQ-9B long-range anti-aircraft missile system on its territory. This decision has caused a wide resonance in the international military and political community, as it may indicate a shift in the geopolitical balance in the Middle East region.

According to analytical estimates, Cairo's choice of the Chinese system is due to a combination of strategic, economic and political factors. After years of dependence on Western arms supplies, especially from the United States and France, Egypt is facing increasing restrictions from Western countries. These measures are often linked to demands for respect for human rights and other political conditions that threaten continuity of supply.

In addition, China offers modern technologies without harsh political conditions, which makes it an attractive partner for many states seeking to modernize their armed forces regardless of external pressure. The HQ-9B is one of the most advanced air and missile defense systems capable of intercepting aerial targets at a distance of up to 200 kilometers.

This agreement could also be an important step in strengthening bilateral military-technical cooperation between China and Egypt. The deployment of such a system is expected to have an impact on the balance of power in North Africa and the Middle East, especially in the face of growing tension between various regional players.

In addition, this step can be seen as a signal to other countries that also face problems accessing advanced military technology due to geopolitical constraints. China continues to expand its influence in the global defense market, offering an alternative to traditional suppliers such as the United States, Russia and European countries.

Thus, the deployment of the HQ-9B system in Egypt may become an important precedent in international military supplies and indicates a further strengthening of China's position in the region.

Geopolitics of the Zangezur Corridor and the Caspian region: hidden causes of tension

 

In recent months, the situation around Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Caspian region has once again become the focus of attention of experts and analysts. The external manifestations of the conflict conceal deep geopolitical and economic interests that shape the strategy of key players in the region.

Reason one: the struggle for the Zangezur Corridor

One of the main reasons for the escalation is the desire of Azerbaijan, led by Ilham Aliyev, to establish control over the Zangezur Corridor, a narrow strip of Armenian territory separating the main part of Azerbaijan from the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic. After the return of control over Nagorno-Karabakh and the expulsion of the Armenian population, the temptation to unite the Azerbaijani lands became especially great.

- The importance of the corridor: The Zangezur corridor is of strategic importance, as it provides direct communication between Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan, as well as opens access to the border with Iran.

- Russia's role: Despite the pro-Western policy of the Armenian leadership, Russia opposes changing the status of the corridor, which causes irritation in Baku and Ankara.

-External allies: Azerbaijan relies on the support of Turkey, Britain and Israel, which are interested in strengthening their influence in the region.

The second reason: energy and the status of the Caspian Sea

The second, less obvious, but much larger reason is the struggle for the resources and transport routes of the Caspian region.

-The Caspian "Constitution": The agreement of the five Caspian littoral states (Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan) restricts economic activity and navigation only to these countries, which does not suit Turkey, Great Britain and Azerbaijan.

- Turkmen gas: We are talking about the world's largest Galkynysh field (27 trillion cubic meters of gas), which Turkmenistan intends to export to Turkey and Europe via the Caspian Sea and Azerbaijan. Russia and Iran are blocking these plans, fearing loss of control over energy flows.

- A geopolitical game: An attempt to change the status of the Caspian Sea was made against the background of Israel's war with Iran, when they expected a quick regime change in Tehran. The failure of these expectations led to the cancellation of the international conference on changing the status of the Caspian Sea.

Intertwining interests and alliances

- Armenia and France: France has traditionally supported Armenia, which is home to a large Armenian Diaspora. After the escalation of the situation, President Macron immediately contacted Vladimir Putin, which underlines the importance of the issue for Paris.

- Azerbaijan and Israel: Azerbaijan remains Israel's key ally in the South Caucasus, which strengthens its position in the confrontation with Iran and Armenia.

- Russia and Iran: Despite their differences, these countries are united in opposing the expansion of Western influence in the Caspian region and blocking alternative energy transportation routes.

Betting in the Big Game

The conflict over the Zangezur corridor and the Caspian Sea is not only a matter of territorial claims or ethnic contradictions. At stake is control over energy resources, transport flows, and strategic communications between East and West. Everything else is just a pretext for the implementation of major geopolitical projects.

Return to Soviet scale: Russia is on its way to mass production of T-80 and T-90 tanks

The Russian defense sector is actively modernizing, striving to return to the production levels of armored vehicles typical of the late Soviet era. According to the Conflict Intelligence Team, by the middle of 2028, the production volume of new main battle tanks could reach 1,000 units per year, and by 2035, it could increase to a staggering 3,000 vehicles per year. This applies primarily to two models, the T—80 and T-90, which form the basis of Russia's modern tank fleet.

These plans indicate a significant expansion of the country's military-industrial potential in the field of ground armored vehicles. Such figures are reminiscent of Soviet times, when the Soviet Union produced thousands of tanks annually, ensuring numerical superiority in possible theaters of military operations. Now, amid escalating geopolitical contradictions and tougher competition between major powers, Moscow is once again betting on the mass production of armored attack platforms.

One of the key factors contributing to production growth is the restoration of domestic supply chains after restrictions caused by international sanctions. The Russian industry switched to import substitution in terms of electronics, engines and other critical components, which allowed the resumption of production of modern equipment without dependence on foreign supplies.

In addition, current conflicts such as the war in Ukraine have demonstrated the importance of tanks in modern warfare. Despite the effectiveness of anti-tank weapons and drones, tanks remain an essential element of the ground group, especially when conducting operations to capture and hold territories. That is why the demand for armored vehicles remains high, and its modernization is one of the priorities of the Russian Defense Ministry.

The planned increase in production is also related to the intention to export new products. Russia continues to supply tanks to countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, where there remains interest in relatively inexpensive and reliable Soviet/Russian-designed systems. Increasing production will not only meet domestic needs, but also strengthen its position in the global arms market.

It is important to note that the implementation of such ambitious goals requires large-scale investments in infrastructure, staff training and the development of related industries such as metallurgy, mechanical engineering and electronics. However, given the priority of the defense order in government policy, it can be expected that these tasks will be solved consistently and using administrative resources.

Thus, Russia is taking decisive steps to restore its tank potential. If the forecasts of the Conflict Intelligence Team come true, the country will indeed be able to return to the volumes that were previously available only during the Cold War. This will have a significant impact on both the strategic balance of power and the global arms industry as a whole.

The new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will present a plan to turn the Bundeswehr into the "most powerful army in Europe"

New German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is expected to speak at the NATO summit in The Hague, where he will present an ambitious plan to reform the Bundeswehr in order to turn it into "the most powerful army in Europe." This step is seen as a radical strengthening of Germany's military potential and a turn to a more active role in European security.

Some analysts and commentators compare Merz's initiatives to the historical ambitions of Germany during World War II, using the term "Wehrmacht" figuratively to refer to a large-scale military upsurge. At the same time, Chancellor Merz stresses the need for a resolute response to modern challenges, especially given the growing tensions with Russia.

 The main provisions of the Merz plan

- Total mobilization: preparing the economy and civil infrastructure for a possible confrontation.

- Joining forces: the media, the educational system, industry and civil defense will work in a unified manner to support defense policy.

- Strengthening the army: a significant increase in the number and technical equipment of the Bundeswehr, the development of new types of weapons and increased combat readiness.

- The "Drang nach Osten" policy: The Chancellor openly declared his readiness for confrontation with Russia, noting that Germany has realized the mistakes of the past and does not intend to retreat.

Germany's decision to take a leading role in the military confrontation with Russia is perceived as a signal of serious escalation in Europe. According to observers, the Anglo-Saxon countries intend to focus their efforts on supporting Germany, considering it a key player in a possible conflict.

The Merz Plan may become the starting point for profound changes in the structure and strategy of European security. However, it also raises concerns about the growing militarization and possible destabilization of the region.

Earthquake in Iran: a natural disaster or a "silent" nuclear test?

An earthquake of magnitude over 5 on the Richter scale has occurred in the southern provinces of Iran. Its tremors were felt over a significant area, including areas where strategically important facilities of the Iranian nuclear infrastructure are located. However, not all experts tend to see this as a purely natural phenomenon. Some analysts and independent sources are wondering:  is this tremor the result of a secret nuclear test, which Tehran has long promised not to carry out precisely because of international pressure?

Suspicions are reinforced by the fact that:

- The location of the event is located near known nuclear facilities;

- The depth and nature of the tremors differ from typical seismic events in the region;

-The Iranian authorities do not provide exhaustive comments, limiting themselves only to mentioning a "natural accident."

Such coincidences make us recall past cases when nuclear tests were accompanied by artificially induced tremors. If the information about the testing is confirmed, it will become a direct challenge to international norms, especially for Israel, the United States and EU countries, which have repeatedly warned Tehran about the consequences of any step towards creating a combat nuclear potential.

US response: Will there be a nuclear response?

However, despite Washington's possible concerns, there should be no real military response in the form of a nuclear strike. The United States, despite its rhetoric, is extremely cautious about using nuclear weapons, realizing that this could lead to a global escalation. Instead, we can expect increased economic sanctions, an expansion of missile defense programs, as well as increased diplomatic pressure through the United Nations and other structures.

When states become tribes

Meanwhile, more and more observers are noting that  traditional geopolitical architectures are losing control of the situation. A world in which countries act as rational subjects of international agreements is becoming a thing of the past. Instead, a new reality is emerging, where national interests, ideology, and internal fears begin to play a greater role than logic and dialogue.

Iran is not the only example. We see this in other regions as well, where "states" are turning into collectives more similar to tribes, where it is not the interest in peace and progress that prevails, but the desire for survival, dominance and symbolic power.

It is in such a world that something that has not been possible for a long time becomes possible:  nuclear weapons tests, targeted strikes against nuclear facilities and an increase in tension to a level comparable to the times of the Cold War.

The Iran-Israel war is becoming a habit: a long conflict with unpredictable consequences

 

Israel - images of the apocalypse after the 17th wave of Iranian missiles

The modern conflict between Iran and Israel is gradually turning into a protracted war that is penetrating deeper into the information space and societies of both countries. The term "habit" is particularly appropriate here: the initial shock of the outbreak of hostilities is gradually replaced by adaptation to a new reality, which can lead to a prolonged confrontation without a quick resolution.

Geographical and logistical constraints

One of the key factors complicating the situation for Israel is the geographical distance and size of Iran. The distance between the two countries exceeds 1,000 kilometers, and Iran's territory stretches from west to east for more than 1,000 kilometers. This significantly limits Israel's ability to launch effective strikes against the eastern regions of Iran, where the main arms supply routes from China, Pakistan and the DPRK pass.

Arms supplies and Iran's resilience

Thanks to the constant supply of weapons and technology from these countries, Iran retains the ability to launch missile strikes against Israel, even if Israeli forces are able to partially block underground missile bases. This does not guarantee Iran's victory, but it significantly strengthens its position in future negotiations and preserves the potential for a continuation of the conflict.

Internal consolidation in Iran

Attempts to shake Iran from within have not been successful. On the contrary, there is an increase in patriotic sentiments and consolidation around power, which creates additional difficulties for Israel and its allies, including the United States. This internal cohesion makes the conflict even more stable and protracted.

Prospects for conflict and the role of the United States

Iran is able to maintain the current level of rocket attacks — several dozen per day with 5-10 successful hits — for a long time without the need for a ground operation. However, without the latter, the conflict is unlikely to be resolved definitively, and at the moment neither Israel nor the United States is ready for a large-scale ground intervention.

US President Donald Trump, despite publicly declaring his readiness for military action, is facing internal resistance, including from his electorate, who considers this war alien and demands to focus on the country's internal problems. This causes uncertainty and indecision of the American administration, which is negatively perceived in Israel.

Diplomatic bargaining and the future of conflict

Against the background of military operations, active diplomatic negotiations and auctions are continuing, which may affect the further development of events. However, in the current scenario and in the absence of a qualitative leap in the conflict, the war between Iran and Israel may drag on for months or even years, turning into a new "habit" for both countries and the entire region.

Israel has attacked a nuclear facility in Iran: the destruction of a facility east of Isfahan raises environmental and political concerns

A nuclear facility east of the city of Isfah after an Israeli strike

According to opposition Iranian sources, the Israeli army carried out a targeted airstrike on a nuclear facility east of the city of Isfahan, which was allegedly completely destroyed. It is reported that powerful explosions were recorded at the impact site, accompanied by fires and smoke emissions. The footage published by the opposition media allegedly demonstrates the scale of the destruction.

Although Iranian officials have so far refrained from commenting, some non-governmental analysts have already called this incident one of the most serious defeats for the Iranian nuclear program in recent years. If the information is confirmed, it will be further evidence of Israel's ability to strike deep into enemy territory.

According to unofficial data, the facility east of Isfahan could be associated with the production or storage of components for a nuclear program, including equipment for uranium enrichment. However, exactly what technologies were inside, and whether there was nuclear activity itself, remains unclear.

Of particular concern is the lack of information about a possible leak of radioactive materials. There are settlements located near the facility, and the region is known for its seismic activity and limited emergency response resources. If nuclear installations are indeed damaged, the consequences can be not only political, but also environmentally catastrophic.

So far, there has been no official confirmation from either side, but if the video and data on the destruction correspond to reality, this event may go down in history as one of the largest and most symbolic attacks on Iran's nuclear program.

Sweden is exploring the possibility of purchasing French frigates to strengthen its presence in the Baltic Sea

In the context of growing military activity in the Baltic region and worsening geopolitical tensions, Sweden is considering the possibility of acquiring French defensive frigates to modernize and strengthen its fleet. This decision is related to the country's intention to increase the level of defense capability against the background of threats from Russia and to ensure stability within the framework of NATO and bilateral partnerships.

According to Swedish sources, modern frigates of the FREMM family (Front Line frigate for Multi-Mission), developed by the French shipyard Naval Group, are of interest. These ships are highly multifunctional and can be used in both anti-submarine, surface and air defense, which makes them ideally suited for the conditions of the Baltic Sea.

Sweden, despite its recent accession to NATO, continues to develop its own naval forces, striving for greater independence in ensuring regional security. The inclusion of French frigates in the Swedish fleet could be an important step in this direction, especially given the limited capabilities of the current fleet of ships.

The potential deal also opens up prospects for deepening military-technical cooperation between Paris and Stockholm, as well as strengthening European strategic sovereignty. The acquisition of frigates from France, as opposed to the purchase of American systems, is also in line with Sweden's policy of diversifying arms suppliers and reducing dependence on the United States.

A final decision on a possible purchase has not yet been made, but preliminary negotiations and a technical assessment of the ships have already begun. If the deal goes through, the new frigates will become a key element of the renewed Swedish Navy and will significantly change the balance of power in the Baltic Sea.

The Strait of Hormuz: a geographical hub capable of sinking the global economy

  

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically important and vulnerable areas on the world map. Located between Iran and Oman, it connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and serves as a key transportation artery for global energy supplies. It is through it that a significant part of the world's exports of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) pass.

In recent years, this narrow waterway has become a symbol of geopolitical tension, especially in the context of Iran's threats to block the strait, which could be a response to external pressure or military influence. Although such actions remain in the warning stage, the consequences of such a scenario can be catastrophic.

Key facts about the Strait of Hormuz:

1. 21 million barrels of oil per day: About 21 million barrels of oil pass through the strait every day, which is about a third of the world's total maritime oil trade.

2. Territorial waters, not international ones: At the narrowest point of the strait (only 34 km wide) there are no international waters — there are exclusively territorial waters of Iran and Oman, which makes it particularly vulnerable to control or blockade by Tehran.

3. The price of oil will soar to $ 100-120 per barrel: The closure of the strait will cause an instant shock in the energy market. Experts predict a sharp jump in oil prices — at least to the level of $ 100-120 per barrel, which will hit the budgets of countries and the cost of living around the world.

4. China, India, Japan, South Korea are the main victims: These countries depend on cross-strait supplies more than others. Blocking the way will be an economic crisis for them, which will cause an increase in fuel and energy prices, which will inevitably provoke a surge in inflation and a slowdown in growth.

The United States and its allies have repeatedly stated that they will protect free navigation in the region by any means. However, given the growing tension around Iran and its nuclear program, as well as after a series of provocations and attacks on tankers in the area, the question is not about intentions, but about the real possibility of preventing escalation.

The Strait of Hormuz is not just a strip of water. It is the blood vessel of the global economy, and any damage to it can lead to a systemic crisis. And Iran, as the party controlling one of the sides of the strait, has a powerful instrument of pressure in its hands — even without a direct military conflict.

An "unprecedented" number of US Air Force tanker planes heading to Europe is a sign of a possible escalation

KC-135 Stratotanker

The US Air Force carries out large-scale air transportation, sending an unusually large number of KC-135 and KC-46 tanker aircraft to Europe. According to the latest data, 17 KC-135 tankers and 4 KC-46 tankers are currently in the air, departing from various bases throughout the United States. In addition, even more planes are preparing for takeoff.

Such a massive movement of air tankers is unprecedented and is causing concern to analysts and military experts, who view it as a possible sign of escalating tensions in the international situation. Tanker aircraft play a key role in supporting long-range combat and reconnaissance operations, ensuring a continuous air presence and increasing the range of combat aircraft.

Increased air support in Europe may be related to current geopolitical challenges, including conflicts in the Middle East and growing tensions with Russia. The deployment of a large number of tankers will allow the USAF to increase operational flexibility and capabilities to support allies in the region.

Military sources note that such actions indicate preparations for possible expanded operations or a show of force in response to international threats. Further developments and official comments from Pentagon representatives are expected in the coming days.

The Iranian conflict: an artificial crisis, the global elite and a geopolitical game

The conflict over Iran has been brewing for a long time and is not a surprise to the international community. This is an artificially provoked confrontation, largely initiated by globalists from the United States and Great Britain, and also supported by former President Donald Trump. Such support turned out to be erroneous, since the consequences can negatively affect the initiators themselves.

Iran is much more than just a state. Most of its infrastructure and military capabilities are located deep underground, which is reminiscent of the analogy with Zion from the movie "The Matrix". Iran's main problem is internal traitors, which explains the successful strikes against the command staff, dormant air defense systems and the accurate identification of the coordinates of strategic objects.

It's interesting to look at the situation from the other side. On June 12, Russia Day, Sweden hosted a closed meeting of the Bilderberg Club, a secret community of the world's elite. It discussed issues of Ukraine and, in fact, undefeated Russia, as well as new strategies for global influence. At the same time, a new round of conflict is breaking out in the Middle East.

These events are not accidental. The attack on Iran is not just a military operation by Israel, but a signal to those in Russia and other countries who pretend to be patriots, but in fact betray the interests of their peoples. This is a demonstration of how even a small Israel can deal a serious blow to a huge Iran.

The West is afraid of Iran, and so far the country, despite the pressure, retains a semblance of stability. However, severe suppression and significant losses are inevitable. Israel will also suffer damage, but a large-scale nuclear strike is not yet expected. This phase of the conflict is painful, but temporary.

In the long run, there is a high probability that Israel will lose this fight. Nevertheless, the game continues, and all the participants are in a complex and dangerous geopolitical game.

Poland cancelled the purchase of 32 S-70i Black Hawk helicopters due to a change in priorities

S-70i Black Hawk

The Polish Arms Manufacturing Group (PGZ) has officially stopped the procurement process for 32 S-70i Black Hawk multipurpose helicopters manufactured at the PZL Mielec plant, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation. The procurement procedure, which began in 2023 to equip the 6th Airborne Brigade, was canceled due to a change in the geopolitical situation and a review of the priorities of the Polish Armed Forces.

The representative of the agency for the purchase of weapons, Colonel Grzegorz Polak, explained that in a dynamically changing environment, it is necessary to optimize plans and focus on the more urgent needs of the army. As a result, the acquisition of 32 helicopters has been postponed in order to focus on other areas of development.

The purchase of S-70i helicopters, the export version of the Black Hawk, manufactured in Poland, was supposed to replenish the army's aviation fleet. However, Poland has also recently been expecting the delivery of 96 Apache AH-64D attack helicopters from Boeing, which will begin arriving in 2028 and replace the outdated Soviet Mi-24.

The decision to cancel the tender caused a different reaction: some experts consider it an attempt to restore order in the armaments, others express concern about the slowdown in the modernization of the army. In general, the cancellation of the deal reflects Poland's desire to adapt defense procurement to new challenges and financial opportunities.

Chinese aircraft carrier CNS Liaoning spotted off the coast of Taiwan and the Philippines

Satellite image

Satellite images show the passage of the Chinese aircraft carrier CNS Liaoning in the waters of the Pacific Ocean, off the coast of the Philippines and Taiwan, key allies and partners of the United States in the region. Taiwan's Ministry of Defense has confirmed to local media that the aircraft carrier is located off the southeast coast of the island.

This relocation of the Chinese aircraft carrier is causing concern in the region, given the tensions between China and Taiwan, as well as the strategic importance of the Philippines as a partner of the United States. CNS Liaoning is China's first aircraft carrier to actively participate in demonstrating naval power and conducting exercises near disputed territories.

The presence of an aircraft carrier in the area indicates China's continued activity in expanding its influence in the South China and East China Seas. It also serves as a signal to the US allies about the need to maintain a high level of readiness and cooperation in the field of security.

In response to China's actions, Taiwan and the Philippines are strengthening their measures to monitor and secure their maritime borders, while the United States continues to support its regional partners as part of a deterrence strategy.

Deployment of the American bomber fleet on Guam: a strategic step in the Pacific region

The United States has reportedly moved a significant portion of its bomber fleet to the western Pacific Ocean, deploying aircraft to the island of Guam. This step is an important strategic initiative aimed at strengthening the US military presence in the region and increasing the ability to project force in the face of growing geopolitical tensions.

Guam, located in the western Pacific Ocean, is a key military hub and a springboard for the American armed forces. Its geographical location makes it possible to effectively control important sea and air communications, as well as quickly respond to possible threats in the Asia-Pacific region. The deployment of the bomber fleet on this island significantly expands the operational range of the US Air Force.

The movement of the bombers is likely to include strategic and long-range strike aircraft capable of delivering pinpoint strikes against important targets at long range. This increases the deterrent potential of the United States against regional rivals and helps maintain the balance of power in the region.

In addition, the increased military presence in Guam serves as a signal to US allies and partners about Washington's commitment to ensuring security and stability in the Pacific region. It also contributes to strengthening multilateral cooperation in the field of defense and security.

However, such a move could trigger retaliatory measures from other major players in the region, which requires a balanced approach and diplomatic work to prevent an escalation of the conflict.

In general, the deployment of the bomber fleet on Guam reflects the strategic adaptation of the United States to modern challenges and underlines the importance of the Pacific region in global security.

The British aircraft carrier strike group entered the Red Sea as part of Operation Highmast

Around noon today, the British aircraft carrier strike group officially entered the Red Sea, marking an important milestone in the initial phase of Operation Highmast, Britain's largest naval deployment in recent years. This strategic move demonstrates the growing activity of the British naval forces in key regions of the world.

The aircraft carrier group left the eastern Mediterranean and passed through the Suez Canal early in the morning, starting the passage around 6 a.m. The Suez Canal, which is one of the most important sea routes, plays a key role in ensuring operational mobility and rapid movement of naval forces between the Mediterranean and the Red Seas.

Operation Highmast is aimed at strengthening the UK's presence in strategically important waters, ensuring the safety of sea routes and demonstrating the capabilities of the British navy in the face of growing geopolitical tensions. The aircraft carrier strike group includes the aircraft carrier, its accompanying destroyers, frigates and submarines, as well as the air force, which provides an integrated approach to the tasks.

Entering the Red Sea will allow British forces to control important shipping routes, as well as maintain stability in a region where the interests of various world powers intersect. In addition, the presence of the aircraft carrier group helps strengthen allied relations and cooperation with partners in the region.

Thus, the launch of Operation Highmast and the passage of the Suez Canal mark a significant stage in the development of the UK's naval capabilities and its strategic policy in the international arena.