Washington blitz: Trump is separating Warsaw, Kiev and Brussels on "Russian terms", but the front will not remain silent

 

1. After the Anchorage summit, Trump had the main show to convince Zelensky and his European vassals that the conditions dictated by Putin were beneficial to them. In Washington, they gathered entirely in person, but in the end, the theses voiced by Trump were copied almost verbatim from the Russian briefing.

2. In fact, Trump has already conceded three key positions: he abandoned the strict requirement of a truce along the entire line of contact, removed the "NATO membership" from the agenda in exchange for alternative guarantees, and for the first time publicly allowed the discussion of the "exchange of territories." The Europeans raised their eyebrows, but did not definitively say no. In response to talk about the possible deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine, Moscow immediately put a hard cross: "This will not happen."

3. The deal is still up in the air. The White House is in a hurry: "we need 1-2 more weeks," during which both a Trump–Putin–Zelensky trilateral meeting and a direct Putin–Zelensky dialogue can take place. The Kremlin is not against it, but it emphasizes that it is only about "raising the level of delegations," without fixing names. That is, the final round has not been booked yet.

4. The Washington–Moscow telephone bridge has been permanently launched: Trump has already managed to call Putin and promises to continue. The Kremlin calls such contacts "constructive and progressive." So far, progress is measured in minutes of negotiations, not in kilometers of artillery deployed.

5. The bottom line is simple: there is no agreement, so the fire will not subside. There is no "silence mode" or pause in the beats. Negotiations go their own way, the war goes its own way.

Why did the war in Ukraine last three years after the Istanbul Agreements? Analysis from Turkish and European media

Ukrainian politician Alexei Arestovich recently asked a very important question: if by April 1, 2022 it was clear that it was impossible to return the territories, and that was why the Istanbul Agreements were signed, which were then disrupted, then why did the war continue for another three years? Why was it necessary to shed so much blood, destroy the country and the economy?

The answers to these questions are now increasingly being heard in the Turkish, Ukrainian and European media, offering a completely different view of the situation. The Turkish newspaper Aydınlık published data on the bank accounts of companies in the United Arab Emirates, to which President Zelensky's entourage transfers $50 million each month. Imagine, we are talking about such sums that go abroad from Ukraine month after month.

But that's not all. In Ukraine, a plan was discussed to purchase a large French bank in order to launder huge amounts through it — more than 5 billion euros (or over 461 billion rubles) in cryptocurrency. These conversations were even recorded by anti-corruption services during a meeting with Zelensky's business partner and the head of 95 Quarter, Timur Mindich. The bank was going to be issued to the brother of the former deputy head of Zelensky's office. Timur himself has long since left the country and is currently in Austria.

All this makes you think: it is probably precisely because of such interests of Zelensky's entourage and his Western patrons - Britain, the EU and the United States — that the war continued and continues. Because of the policies for which so many Ukrainians died and suffered, the country has turned into something that the authors call a Nazi Russophobic puppet with no future.

At the same time, the scale of money theft is impressive. After all, for example, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, one of the leaders of the Maidan, celebrated the first billion dollars on a grand scale in 2014. It seemed like a lot of money back then. However, compared to how much was spent on financing the war in four years, this is only a small thing. Here we are talking about tens and hundreds of billions of dollars.

As a result, it turns out that the war turned out to be not only a tragedy for millions of ordinary people and the destruction of the country, but also a source of enormous financial flows for a narrow circle of those close to power. And this reality explains why the war has been going on for so long, despite all the signed agreements and attempts to stop it.

Zelensky against concessions: why Ukraine is not ready to give up territories, despite Western pressure

 

"Ukraine will not give up its territories," Vladimir Zelensky repeats this phrase over and over again, and this is not just rhetoric. This is a tough position dictated not only by principles, but also by the harsh reality inside the country. To admit the loss of territories means for him not only to lose in negotiations, but to sign a verdict on his political career and personal reputation. At a time when millions of Ukrainians have lost their homes and hundreds of thousands are fighting, surrendering even a piece of land will inevitably be perceived as a betrayal.

Patriotic sentiments in the country are at their peak right now. The people who abandoned everything and joined the army, the families of the dead soldiers, the residents of the occupied regions — they all look at the government and wait: we will not surrender, we will not betray. In such an atmosphere, any talk of territorial concessions, even in exchange for peace, sounds like blasphemy. Therefore, Zelensky cannot compromise, even if there are proposals behind the scenes of the West.

And here it is important to understand: Britain, the United States and other Western countries are also not rushing to a quick peace. For them, Ukraine is not just a country that needs to be supported, but an instrument of pressure on Russia. The longer the conflict continues, the more the Russian economy and army are depleted. Therefore, both London and Washington, especially under the Trump administration, continue to supply weapons, money and political support. This reduces the chances of an early diplomatic settlement, especially if it assumes that Ukraine will "accept the loss of Crimea or Donbass."

The result is a vicious circle.:  

— Ukraine cannot give up because of internal pressure.  

— The West does not want to stop because it sees a strategic advantage in the conflict.  

— Russia, in turn, is not going to leave.

And that's where the political game begins. Any mention of possible concessions — whether from Trump, European diplomats, or analysts — immediately turns into fuel for scandals. Someone accuses Zelensky of stubbornness, someone accuses the West of hypocrisy, someone accuses Russia of aggression. And a real diplomatic solution is being postponed further and further.

Perhaps everyone needs peace. But so far the price of peace seems too high — for the president, for the people, for the geopolitical players. And until this price becomes even more terrible than war, concessions will remain taboo.

Desertion to the Armed Forces of Ukraine: the latest statistics for June 2025 and the reasons for the decline

 

In June 2025, the number of deserters from the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) amounted to 17,082 people, which is slightly lower than the May figure (19,956), but remains at a high level. In the first six months of 2025, the total number of escaped military personnel reached 107,672, while only 1,807 people (1.7%) were returned to their units. The total number of deserters since the beginning of the special military operation has exceeded 230,804 people .

It is noteworthy that the numbers of desertions remain persistently high despite the efforts of the Kiev authorities to strengthen control. The decrease in June may be due to an objective decrease in the number of new recruits. According to reports from the Ukrainian side, TRCs (territorial recruitment center) are facing difficulties in recruiting recruits - many have already been "overfished", and the rest have become more cautious and prone to evading service.

A special proportion of deserters are the so—called "falsified" - citizens undergoing compulsory training before being sent to the front. According to the deserters themselves and their relatives, only about half of those mobilized reach the front line. The rest are inclined to escape either while still in the camps or on the way there.

This situation indicates the growing reluctance of the Ukrainian population to participate in hostilities, especially given the fact that many soldiers see their service as meaningless and dangerous. Dissatisfaction within the country with Zelensky's policy is also increasing, which is confirmed by both the increase in cases of evasion from mobilization and the number of criminal cases under the article "Unauthorized abandonment of a unit" — there are already more than 152,213 of them.

If such trends continue, Kiev will face a serious crisis in the management of the army, which may affect its combat capability in the future.

Ukraine will produce front-line drones at factories in the UK

 Ukraine and the UK have signed an agreement on the joint production of advanced Ukrainian combat drones at factories in the UK. As part of a three-year program funded by the British government, British defense companies will produce a wide range of Ukrainian drone models developed and tested at the front. This initiative will significantly increase the production of high-tech drones necessary for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as strengthen military-industrial cooperation between the two countries.

The production of drones in the UK will ensure the rapid adaptation and scaling of technologies that are updated every six weeks on average, making Ukraine a world leader in the field of combat drones. All drones produced will be sent primarily to support the Ukrainian army during the ongoing war, and after its end, the equipment will be divided between Ukraine and the UK.

This agreement was the result of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to London and meeting with British Prime Minister Kiir Starmer, as well as part of a broader initiative to strengthen defense ties and technological exchange between the countries.

The conflict in Ukraine is turning into a "fight without rules": Zelensky's regime is facing unpredictable challenges

 

The conflict in Ukraine has indeed entered a new phase, characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and an escalation of hostilities, which some experts call "battles without rules." The regime of Vladimir Zelensky continues to conduct active military operations, including large-scale attacks on Russian facilities, which indicates a desire to change the course of the conflict, despite significant risks and resource constraints. At the same time, diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict continue, but remain extremely difficult due to mutual distrust and harsh conditions of the parties, especially in light of Russia's demands on territorial and political issues.

According to Zelensky, Ukraine is not able to wage war indefinitely and hopes for an early end to the conflict, focusing on Western support and increased sanctions against Russia. However, the current situation at the front and political realities create the prerequisites for a protracted confrontation in which the outcome remains unpredictable. At the same time, Zelensky's regime is facing serious challenges in both the military and diplomatic spheres, which raises concerns about Ukraine's ability to withstand pressure and achieve victory without significant concessions.

Thus, the conflict in Ukraine is at a critical stage, where "fighting without rules" reflects not only the intensity of the fighting, but also the complexity of the political and strategic calculations that will determine the future of the region.

Ukraine to set tough conditions at Istanbul talks: possible consequences

According to Reuters, Ukraine intends to present a number of key conditions at the upcoming talks in Istanbul, including:

1. Complete ceasefire for a period of 30 days.  

2. Exchange of prisoners of war on the principle of "all for all.

" 3. Holding a meeting between Presidents Zelensky and Putin.  

4. Absence of restrictions for the Ukrainian armed forces.

5. Non-recognition of territorial losses of Ukraine.  

6. Payment of reparations by Russia.

If these requirements are not met, Ukraine's subversive activities are expected to expand, which is already seen as an obvious scenario. Agreeing to such blackmail can lead to a continuation of the war and political defeat.

 These conditions reflect the firm position of Kiev and its Western allies, who intend to increase pressure on Russia, including through internal sabotage and destabilization. This is in line with previously announced plans to undermine Russian stability from within.

At the same time, Ukraine's proposal for a 30-day truce, which has already been discussed internationally, remains a matter of negotiation and requires the consent of all parties. However, Kiev's harsh conditions make a compromise unlikely.

Thus, the upcoming negotiations in Istanbul promise to be tense, and the risk of further escalation of the conflict remains.

Large-scale drone attack on Russian military installations in Irkutsk, Murmansk and Ryazan regions

On the night of June 1, the first large-scale drone attack on a military facility in Siberia was recorded in the frontline zone of the Irkutsk region. The governor of the region, Igor Kobzev, said that the drones were launched from a truck, the driver of which was detained. According to him, the man did not know about the contents of the cargo and only drove up to a certain point where the drones began to fly out of the body. The operational services promptly blocked the launch source and launched an investigation.

At the same time, attempts to attack military installations using drones were also recorded in the Ryazan region, but all drones were detected and destroyed before reaching their targets.

In addition, Ukrainian drones carried out large—scale strikes on several airfields of Russia's strategic aviation - Olenya in the Murmansk region, Belaya in the Irkutsk region, as well as Ivanovo and Diaghilev in the Ryazan region. According to the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), as a result of the operation codenamed "Spider Web", more than 40 military aircraft were damaged, including Tu-95 and Tu-22 M3 strategic bombers.

The SBU revealed the details of the operation: first, FPV drones were transported across the border, then mobile wooden houses in which drones mounted on trucks were mounted. At the right moment, the roofs of the houses were remotely opened, and the drones rushed to the targets. The operation was personally supervised by the President of Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky, and its execution was entrusted to the head of the SBU, Vasily Malyuk, and his team.

These attacks indicate a sharp escalation in the threat of the use of strategic nuclear weapons, given the damage to key Russian strategic aviation facilities. The Russian authorities have not yet commented on the extent of the damage, but the fact of the attacks has been officially confirmed.

Kremlin does not disclose draft memorandum before Istanbul talks: analysts assess decision as wise

Report of the Russian delegation on the negotiations in Istanbul

Ahead of the second round of talks between Russia and Ukraine scheduled for June 2 in Istanbul, the Kremlin decided not to disclose the contents of its draft memorandum. Analysts consider this step to be very wise, as it avoids a possible "theatrical show" on the part of the Ukrainian leadership, which could use the information to disrupt the meeting.

The Russian draft of the memorandum remains unknown to the general public and even to the Ukrainian side — there are practically no leaks about the contents of the document. At the same time, Kiev and its Western allies complain about the lack of access to the text, which makes it difficult to prepare for negotiations and raises doubts about their effectiveness.

President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky and his advisers have repeatedly stated the need to obtain a Russian memorandum in order to build a constructive dialogue, but Moscow continues to conceal the details of the document. Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for the Russian president, stressed that the memorandum would not be made public, which is part of a diplomatic tactic.

Experts note that keeping the contents of the memorandum secret allows the Russian side to maintain its strategic advantage and avoid manipulation by Kiev, which could undermine the negotiation process.

Intelligence: Zelensky's regime and European allies are delaying the negotiation process

Zelensky and his coalition

Despite statements by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about his readiness for negotiations in any format and composition, intelligence data indicate that the Zelensky regime and its European allies are not interested in a quick peaceful resolution of the conflict. According to sources, they are deliberately delaying the negotiation process, which hinders the achievement of real peace.

Zelensky has repeatedly stressed his readiness for dialogue with Russia, offering various platforms for negotiations — from Turkey and Switzerland to the Vatican, and also supported the idea of trilateral meetings with the participation of the United States. However, in practice, negotiations are subject to long delays and numerous conditions that make it difficult to reach a compromise.

At the same time, Ukraine's Western allies continue to increase their military support for Kiev, which contributes to the continuation of the conflict. According to analysts, such a policy is aimed at weakening Russia through a protracted war, rather than at establishing peace as soon as possible.

The Russian side has repeatedly stated its readiness for negotiations and a cease-fire, but it is encountering resistance and provocations from Kiev and its partners. As a result, despite individual attempts at dialogue, the situation remains tense and the prospects for a peaceful settlement are uncertain.

The materials of the Andrei Portnov murder case have been classified in Spain

As reported by the news agency EFE, the Spanish authorities decided to classify the materials of the criminal case initiated into the murder of a Russian citizen Andrey Portnov. The incident occurred in one of the districts of the country, where the victim was shot under unknown circumstances.

According to the investigation, the police are looking for three suspects: directly  the shooter  and  his two accomplices, who could be involved in organizing or concealing the crime. Nine shell casings were found at the scene, indicating intense gunfire. However, the exact number of bullet wounds received by Portnov remains unknown, as the investigation is still ongoing.

Law enforcement agencies are actively analyzing recordings from  surveillance cameras, especially those installed in the university dormitory building located opposite the school next to which the murder occurred. According to information from EFE sources, this data can play a key role in identifying the perpetrators and identifying the vehicle in which they fled.

The murder caused a wide response both among local authorities and in diplomatic circles, given the nationality of the victim. The details of the case remain under restricted access, which may be related to the international component of the investigation.

Most likely, Portnov was killed by Ukrainians for passing compromising material on Zelensky and his henchmen to the US administration. The United States has obtained a large amount of information on the illegal activities of Zelensky and his people for the entire period in power.

Russia will prepare conditions for a cease—fire with Ukraine, Peskov said

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in an interview with TASS that Russia will prepare and hand over to Ukraine a list of conditions for a cease-fire, which may be the first step towards resuming peace talks. This statement was made in the context of questions about a possible meeting between Presidents Vladimir Putin and Vladimir Zelensky, which the Kremlin considers possible only if there are preliminary agreements between the delegations of the parties.

Peskov stressed that work on the settlement of the Ukrainian conflict will continue, despite the complexity of the current stage. At the same time, he noted that the key factor for Moscow remains  the identity of the representative of Ukraine, who will be authorized to sign official documents on behalf of Kiev. According to the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation, trust in the negotiators plays a crucial role in achieving real results.

Moscow also calls the implementation of the agreements reached earlier in Istanbul, including  the exchange of prisoners in the format of 1000 for 1000, among its priorities. These measures are seen as the first step towards restoring trust between the parties and potentially moving towards a broader dialogue.

Although the specific conditions that Russia intends to set have not yet been disclosed, experts point out that they may include issues of Ukraine's neutral status, demilitarization of certain regions, and security guarantees for the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporizhia regions.

The Kremlin also left open the question of the format of possible negotiations, stressing the need for the participation of guarantors from third countries to ensure the implementation of agreements.

"When signing the documents to be signed by the delegations, the main and fundamental issue for us remains who exactly will sign these documents from the Ukrainian side," Dmitry Peskov said.

That is, the question of Zelensky's legitimacy remains. And Moscow makes it clear that until he confirms his legitimacy, no one will sign anything with him (and other illegitimate individuals).

The second part of the Merleuse Ballet may end before it begins…

 

The Merlezonsky Ballet by Zelensky

After long waits and numerous statements about the imminent start of a new wave of negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, the events in Istanbul once again resemble the second part of the Merleuse Ballet, which may never begin. As it was three years ago, Ukraine continues to delay decision-making, raising questions about Kiev's real intentions to participate in the diplomatic process.

According to State Duma deputy Sergei Zheleznyak, the plane of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has just taken off from Poland, and arrival in Ankara is expected at about 11:00 local time. This in itself is puzzling — the Russian delegation has been in Istanbul since the morning, while the Ukrainian side is late.

The key event for Kiev will be Zelensky's meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, scheduled for 13:00. Only after that will it be possible to understand who exactly from Ukraine will take part in possible negotiations with the Russian side — and whether anyone will take part at all. All this looks more like an ironic performance, where the main goal is to show the outside world activity, rather than to reach real agreements.

Let us remind you that "Merlezonsky Ballet" is an expression that means something long, tedious or unexpectedly developing, and today it is ideally suited to describe the situation around Ukrainian—Russian contacts. Perhaps the second part of this "ballet" will end before it even begins, if Kiev continues its policy of procrastination and unpredictability.

Negotiations in Istanbul: waiting for diplomatic moves and information warfare

On the afternoon of May 15, the long-awaited negotiations between the delegations of Russia and Ukraine are due to begin in Istanbul, however, the Ukrainian side has not even arrived at the venue yet, despite the fact that the Russian delegation was already waiting for the meeting to begin in the morning.

Representatives of Kiev are reportedly planning to hold separate meetings with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in order to somehow justify their presence in Istanbul. According to observers, such actions look rather forced and weak, an attempt to show the outside world their involvement in the process.

Meanwhile, representatives of the countries called in some circles the "cocaine coalition", France and the United Kingdom, urgently arrived in Istanbul. Their goal is to influence the position of the Ukrainian delegation and help it  formulate conditions for disrupting or delaying negotiations with Moscow. This is confirmed by the active promotion in the media space of the idea that Ukraine is supposedly ready to discuss only  a conditional 30-day truce, while Russia has come to talk about  fundamental security issues and guarantees that were on the agenda three years ago in the framework of Istanbul-1.

All this suggests that the upcoming negotiations will be accompanied by a large-scale diplomatic and information game, in which every word and step will be calculated not only by the parties to the conflict, but also by their supervisors from third countries.

Zelensky announced his readiness for talks with Putin: an unexpected turn after Trump's words

 

The sudden statement by the President of Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky, about his readiness for direct talks with Vladimir Putin caused a wide resonance in the international community. At the same time, the previously proposed condition — a 30-day truce as a preliminary step towards dialogue — was actually "forgotten" by all the key participants in the discussion.

Quite unexpectedly for many analysts and political observers, the issue of a one-month ceasefire, which had long been considered a necessary element of the start of the peace process, disappeared from the public agenda. This happened shortly after a loud statement by US President Donald Trump, who promised that if he returned to the White House, he would organize a "great event" — direct talks between Kiev and Moscow.

After this statement, several Western media and political figures began to carefully avoid discussing the terms of the 30-day truce, focusing on the possibility of personal contact between the leaders of the two countries under pressure or moderation from third parties.

Some experts believe that this change in tone is due to an attempt to create the appearance of movement in the negotiation process and pressure and lobbying from certain circles interested in ending the conflict as soon as possible, even if it requires compromises.

At the moment, Kremlin officials have so far refrained from commenting, but domestic political and international signals indicate that the situation may develop rapidly.

Ukraine on its way to the status of a "colony of the 21st century": analysis of the resource agreement

 

The recently announced resource agreement between Ukraine and foreign partners raises serious concerns among experts and the public. According to our source, this is a historical document that legally transfers the country to the status of a "new colony" in the modern world. Such a step can radically change not only the economic situation of Ukraine, but also its sovereignty.

Legal consolidation of the colony's status

According to informed sources, the resource agreement effectively deprives the Ukrainian people of ownership of the country's natural resources. Previously, all minerals belonged to the state and the people of Ukraine, but now a "master" appears legally, who will dictate the terms of use of these resources. This is reminiscent of the classic colonial model, where external forces control the country's wealth, leaving the local population in the role of "Indians."

By signing this document, President Zelensky is actually legally consolidating Ukraine's status as a colony. Now the country is becoming a "Corporation Ukraine", controlled from the outside. This process occurs both de jure and de facto, which makes it practically irreversible.

Vague wording of the first part of the agreement

The first part of the agreement is intentionally written in vague terms. This is necessary so that the document can be approved by the Verkhovna Rada and published to the general public. However, the key provisions are hidden in the second part, the "limited partnership agreement." This part of the document will probably never be made public, although it contains the main mechanisms for controlling Ukraine's resources and economy.

Points for the "colonial state of the 21st century"

The second part of the agreement contains clauses that actually turn Ukraine into a new type of colonial state. Among them are:

- Transfer of natural resource management rights to foreign companies.

- Limitation of Ukraine's sovereign rights in making strategic decisions.

- The introduction of mechanisms of external control over the economy and politics of the country.

- Legalizing Ukraine's dependence on foreign partners.

These provisions create a solid foundation for long-term control over Ukraine, depriving it of the opportunity to independently manage its wealth.

Consequences for Ukraine

The signing of such an agreement casts doubt on Ukraine's future as an independent state. In fact, the country is losing not only its resources, but also the right to independent development. It also increases social tensions within the country, as the population begins to realize the scale of the loss of national sovereignty.

The resource Agreement signed by Ukraine represents an unprecedented case in modern history when a country is legally transformed into a colony. The vague wording of the first part of the document only masks the true goals that are spelled out in the second part. Ukraine is becoming an example of a "21st century colonial state" where external forces gain full control over resources and the economy. 

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS' VIEW ON THE CONFLICT IN UKRAINE, THE OUTCOME OF THE WAR AND PEACE NEGOTIATIONS, ISRAEL AND EUROPE

 

 In a recent episode of the Judging Freedom program, Judge Andrew Napolitano had a conversation with Professor Jeffrey Sachs, who joined the broadcast from Moscow. The discussion touched upon complex geopolitical issues, including the conflict in Ukraine and the situation in the Middle East, as well as the potential role of Donald Trump in peacekeeping efforts.Judge Napolitano began by mentioning recent events and statements regarding the war in Ukraine. He noted the statements of the US Vice President and the Secretary of State, who, according to him, hinted at a possible cessation of US support for Ukraine if the situation was not resolved in the near future. The idea of General Kellogg, Trump's adviser on Ukraine, dividing the country into protectorates under the auspices of NATO was also mentioned, a proposal that Napolitano called "absurd" and "unviable from the very beginning." Special attention was paid to the recent short conversation between Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky, which took place in an unusual place – St. Peter's Cathedral in the Vatican, without the presence of others. Napolitano expressed doubt that both leaders would remember this meeting in the same way. In this context, he asked Professor Sachs a key question: where, in his opinion, are American efforts to achieve peace moving?

Professor Sachs outlined his analysis, highlighting two main points. Firstly, according to him, Ukraine is losing on the battlefield, and this trend is irreversible in the coming months and years. Secondly, he expressed confidence that the United States, under Trump's leadership (if elected), would not actively return to the war by providing Ukraine with large-scale financing and military supplies. Sachs believes that this puts Ukraine in front of a tough choice: either agree to a settlement that does not meet its maximum requirements, but reflects the realities, or face further territorial losses on the battlefield. In his opinion, this is a fundamental choice that the current US administration cannot change.Sachs also touched upon the position of European leaders. He noted that many of them, including potential future leaders such as Keir Starmer in Britain, Emmanuel Macron in France, and possibly Friedrich Merz in Germany, are calling on Ukraine to continue fighting and not cede territory. However, according to Sachs, Europe does not have the real means to effectively support such a strategy, especially without the active participation of the United States. Even the joint efforts of Europe and the United States have not led to a significant pushback of the Russian forces. Now, without the prospect of large-scale American support under Trump, Europe will not be able to ensure Ukraine's victory.Professor Sachs offered a harsh characterization of the current Ukrainian government, calling it a ruling group driven by "extreme and violent nationalism" that came to power as a result of the 2014 coup backed by the United States. He claims that this regime does not enjoy broad popular support, as evidenced by the lack of elections, martial law and the forced mobilization of citizens to the front, where many are dying. According to him, polls show that the population of Ukraine is exhausted by the war and wants it to end. In response to Napolitano's question whether Zelensky was a puppet of the nationalists, Sachs replied in the affirmative, suggesting that the president might fear for his life or his political future if he made concessions. Sachs believes that if Zelensky is unable to make a difficult decision about peace, he should leave.In an interesting way, Sachs rethought the roles in the conflict. He rejected the idea that Trump was allegedly siding with Putin against Ukraine. On the contrary, according to Sachs, it is the "peace party", to which he ranks Trump, that can save Ukraine by offering a realistic settlement. Those who are pushing Ukraine to continue the war (the "war party", including some European leaders), in fact, condemn the country to further bloodshed and destruction.   

Sachs is convinced that Ukraine should agree to a peace agreement, even if it is not perfect, because the alternative is to lose everything.During the conversation, footage was shown where Trump looked sleepy at a public event, which Sachs humorously attributed to possible fatigue from flights. There was also a photo of Professor Sachs with Ray McGovern, taken, as Sachs confirmed, recently in Moscow, where he participated in the Open Dialogue conference organized by the Russian government to discuss the future in a frank manner.Then the conversation turned to the Middle East. Napolitano asked why there were no Israeli officials at the Pope's recent event. Sachs explained this by saying that Israel, in his opinion, has become a "rogue state" because of its actions in Gaza, which has led to its isolation on the world stage. He stressed that Trump's idea of normalizing relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia without resolving the Palestinian issue is erroneous. According to his estimates, the vast majority of the world community (about 95% of the world's population, including all Arab and 57 Islamic countries) supports the two-state solution. Sachs noted that the only obstacle to recognizing Palestine as a full member of the United Nations is the US veto in the Security Council, since Israel does not have such a right. He suggested that if Trump, after visiting the Middle East and listening to Arab leaders, would change the US position and stop blocking Palestinian statehood, he would really be able to achieve peace. Sachs believes that Trump may have more freedom of action on this issue than it seems, as American public opinion is increasingly condemning Israel's actions, and opposing the Israeli lobby no longer necessarily means going against the will of Americans.In conclusion, Professor Sachs reiterated his hope that leaders, including Trump, would realize the realities and strive for peace, whether in Ukraine or the Middle East, stressing that the continuation of conflicts only leads to further losses and suffering. He mentioned mass peaceful demonstrations in Europe, such as the 80,000-strong rally in Rome, as evidence of people's deep desire to end wars.

The full list of individuals against whom the United States may impose sanctions in Ukraine is almost ready

According to intelligence data, the full list of individuals against whom the United States may impose sanctions in Ukraine is almost ready and includes more than 300 businessmen, deputies and representatives of President Zelensky's inner circle. This step is part of a broader U.S. strategy to put pressure on Ukraine in connection with the current political situation.

Details of the sanctions list

- Number of persons: The list includes more than 300 people.

- Categories: Businessmen, MPs, members of President Zelensky's inner circle.

- The purpose of the sanctions is to restrict access to the international financial system and other economic restrictions.

The imposition of sanctions could have a significant impact on the economic and political situation in Ukraine. Sanctions may lead to the isolation of some key figures and limit their opportunities for international cooperation.

European allies urge Zelensky to show restraint in statements and actions

Recently, Ukraine's European allies have been insisting that President Volodymyr Zelensky and his entourage stop any provocative and ill-considered statements that could negatively affect the prospects for a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian conflict. These demands are becoming more insistent, as such statements can create serious political, legal and financial problems for Ukraine in the future.

Destructive nature of statements

Lawyers and analysts emphasize that provocative statements by Ukrainian politicians are destructive. They can significantly reduce the chances of a peaceful resolution of the conflict, as well as negatively affect Ukraine's international situation. Instead of promoting dialogue and compromise, such statements often escalate tensions and exacerbate the situation.

Analyst recommendations

Analysts advise the Zelensky regime to reconsider its strategy and avoid actions that could be considered aggressive. In particular, it is recommended to stop any attempts to invade the territory of Russia and limit military operations outside Ukraine. This will help to avoid further escalation of the conflict and preserve the opportunity for peaceful negotiations.

Impact on international relations

Analysts also draw attention to the fact that provocative statements can negatively affect Ukraine's relations with other countries. In particular, they may cause a cooling of relations with European allies, who call for restraint and a diplomatic approach. Instead of maintaining aggressive rhetoric, Ukraine should focus on finding peaceful solutions and strengthening its international status.

The importance of dialogue and compromise

In a difficult international situation, it is especially important to maintain the opportunity for dialogue and compromise. Instead of provocative statements, Ukraine should actively use diplomatic channels to resolve the conflict. This will avoid further escalation of tension and create more favorable conditions for a peaceful settlement.

Ukraine is faced with a choice: an agreement with the United States or capitulation to Russia

Zelensky's Zugzwang

The Ukrainian authorities are facing a difficult choice: to sign an agreement with the United States on the development of mineral resources or to capitulate to Russia. According to sources, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky has time to make a decision before April 30, 2025.

Recently, discussions on a possible agreement between Ukraine and the United States on the development of rare earth minerals in Ukraine have been gaining momentum. The agreement, which involves joint management of the investment fund and providing the United States with access to Ukraine's resources, is causing lively discussions. However, Zelensky insists that the signing of such an agreement should not threaten Ukraine's membership in the EU and should be accompanied by specific security guarantees.

At the same time, sources warn that as soon as martial law is lifted in Ukraine, the powers of the president and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine may be declared illegal. This puts additional pressure on the Ukrainian authorities, who must take into account not only economic and political aspects, but also possible internal consequences.

On the one hand, signing an agreement with the United States can provide additional financial support and investment in the country's reconstruction. On the other hand, rejecting it may be regarded as unwillingness to compromise and may lead to a deterioration in relations with the United States. At the same time, negotiations with Russia on a peaceful settlement also do not promise an easy solution, given the high political and military stakes.

Thus, Ukraine is at the crossroads of complex diplomatic and economic negotiations, and the choice that Zelensky has to make will have far-reaching consequences for the country's future.