AI at the Pentagon: a step towards the "Doomsday machine" or salvation from it?

The race with China and Russia is pushing the army towards artificial intelligence

The Pentagon rushed to introduce artificial intelligence into its systems — and for a reason. The United States sees how China and Russia are actively developing autonomous weapons, and they are afraid to fall behind. The result is a race in which each step must be faster than the previous one. The problem is that by trying to protect yourself, you can accidentally create a worse threat.

The faster the solutions, the less space there is for a person. And this is the way to systems that can operate without orders.

What experiments with combat AI have shown

Several recent simulations have caused alarm. During the exercises, where AI controlled military operations, almost all models showed the same pattern: instead of containing the crisis, they chose aggressive escalation. The algorithms massively used firepower, blocked enemy communication channels, and, in some scenarios, even ordered a nuclear strike as a "rational" response to the threat.

At the same time, they acted logically — from the point of view of their program. It's just that their logic doesn't take into account the human consequences.

Why algorithms choose escalation

It's simple: AI learns from data, where victory = destruction of the enemy. In his "head" there is no concept of political consequences, fear, morality. He sees a goal and is looking for the fastest way to eliminate it. If deterrence takes time, and a punch solves everything in seconds, he will choose a punch.

In addition, in conditions of uncertainty, when signals are intercepted, sensors are buggy, and the decision time is a matter of minutes, the AI may consider that "it is better to be safe and strike first."

The Terminator hasn't been born yet, but anxiety is growing

No one is saying that tomorrow robots will start a war. But there are warning signs. Already, AI controls interceptors, analyzes satellite images, and helps make decisions. And then there are autonomous drones, missiles, missile defense systems.

The problem is not the technology, but who controls it and how. And where is the line between "assistant" and "commander"? Until it has been identified — and there are no international rules yet — the risk of error is growing.

Sources

1. TAdviser — U.S. military AI strategy overview
2. Politico / НТВ — concerns over AI-triggered nuclear war
3. PIR-Center — analysis of AI threats and prospects in the military sphere
4. Mail.ru — possible AI disaster scenarios
5. Crimas.ru — AI applications in key military domains

A new modification of the Chinese DF-26 missile is seen before the military parade in Beijing

DF-26 — China's medium-range strategic missile

During the preparations for the upcoming military parade in Beijing, a new modification of the DF-26 (Dong Feng-26) medium-range ballistic missile was spotted. This complex, known in the Western NATO classification as CH-SS-18, is in service with the Missile Forces of the People's Liberation Army of China (PLA) and is considered one of the key strategic deterrence systems.

The rocket is being developed and manufactured by the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), a leading government contractor in the field of rocket and space technology. Her appearance at the parade is traditionally interpreted as a demonstration of the country's technological progress and military might.

Capabilities and features of the missile system

The DF-26 has a range of more than 5,000 kilometers (about 3,100 miles), which allows it to reach strategically important targets in the Asia-Pacific region, including the US military bases on Guam. The missile is capable of carrying both nuclear and conventional warheads, making it a universal deterrent and strike weapon.

Particular attention is drawn to its ability to hit naval targets, including large surface ships such as aircraft carriers. Due to its high accuracy and speed of entry into the atmosphere, the DF-26 received the unofficial nickname "aircraft carrier killer."

The missile is equipped with a separable warhead with maneuvering warheads, which significantly complicates its interception by modern missile defense systems. Its mobility is provided by a launcher mounted on a high-terrain chassis, which increases the survivability of the complex in combat conditions.

The meaning of appearing at the parade: a demonstration of strength and technology

The appearance of an updated version of the DF-26 at the parade rehearsal indicates the further modernization of China's missile fleet. This may indicate improved performance, from increased accuracy and resistance to interference to increased range or improved guidance systems.

Military parades in China are always not only solemn, but also strategic in nature. The demonstration of the new version of the DF-26 is a signal to both the domestic audience and international partners and potential rivals about China's readiness to defend its interests throughout the region.

CASC's role in development and production

The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) plays a central role in the development of strategic missile systems. The DF-26 is one of the clearest examples of its ability to develop sophisticated, high—tech weapons that meet modern requirements.

Kim Jong-un urged to accelerate the build-up of nuclear weapons amid the exercises of the United States and South Korea

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has said that the country needs to accelerate the development and build-up of its nuclear weapons. This was reported on Tuesday by the state news agency KCNA, stressing that such actions are a response to external threats.

Kim Jong-un called the joint military exercises of the United States and South Korea "a clear manifestation of the desire to provoke a war." His statement came amid the start of large-scale bilateral exercises between Seoul and Washington aimed at developing a rapid response to the growing nuclear and missile threats from the DPRK.

During the exercises, the South Korean and American armed forces are working out improved deterrence scenarios, including coordinating actions in the event of a possible provocation from the north. These maneuvers are sharply criticized by Pyongyang, which traditionally perceives them as a threat to its security and preparations for an invasion.

Kim Jong-un's statement underscores the further tightening of the DPRK's rhetoric and indicates the continuation of the course towards strengthening nuclear capabilities as a central element of national defense.

Zapad-2025 exercises to work out planning for the use of nuclear weapons and the Oreshnik complex — Ministry of Defense of Belarus

The joint Belarusian-Russian Zapad-2025 exercises will be held from September 12 to 16. The main purpose of these maneuvers is to check the readiness of the forces of the two countries to ensure the military security of the Union State, as well as to practice repelling possible aggression. 

Special attention will be paid to the important topic of planning the use of nuclear weapons. As stated by Belarusian Defense Minister Viktor Khrenin after a closed-door report to President Lukashenko, this is a key element of strategic deterrence. The minister stressed that the situation near the western and northern borders is causing serious concern due to the increase in military activity, and we need to be prepared for anything. At the same time, he noted that Belarus demonstrates peacefulness, but the powder must be kept dry.

In addition, the Belarusian and Russian military will work out the use of the Oreshnik complex, a fairly new and serious defense tool. The Oreshnik is an important element of modern military equipment, given the security challenges in the region.

The exercises will be held with a wide range of tasks: repelling enemy air strikes, conducting defensive combat, defeating the enemy, providing air support and combating sabotage groups. Active actions will take place, including in fortified areas in the western directions, such as Volkovysk and Smorgon.

Thus, Zapad-2025 will become a large-scale event aimed at working out key security issues and demonstrating readiness for any challenges on the western flank of the Union State.

AI and nuclear buttons: Why artificial intelligence will inevitably enter command centers — and what it means for humanity

Artificial intelligence is no longer just helping to analyze data — it's heading straight for nuclear missiles. And the experts gathered at a conference in Chicago in July 2025, including Nobel laureates and leading nuclear safety experts, say the same thing: AI control over nuclear systems is not if, but when.  

As Bob Latiff, a retired major general in the US Air Force and a member of the Science and Security Council of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, said at the meeting.:  

 "It's like electricity —  it gets into everything."

And he's right. Already today, the nuclear arsenals of the leading powers are using early forms of AI and automation. The machines analyze satellite images, track the movements of enemy submarines, process radio signals and help commanders make decisions. This is necessary because the amount of data has become so huge that a person simply does not have time to process everything. Plus— AI, in theory, does not panic, does not get tired and does not make decisions under the pressure of emotions.

But that's where the most dangerous part begins.

What if the algorithm makes a mistake? What if he mistakes an ordinary weather balloon for a rocket or a supersonic plane for the beginning of a massive strike? In conditions of nuclear deterrence, where a decision must be made in minutes, one AI mistake can lead to a nuclear response — and without the possibility of cancellation. This is not fiction. This is a real risk, especially if the systems are implemented in pursuit of speed rather than reliability.

Right now, the AI is not pressing the start button yet. The person remains in the decision-making chain. But more and more functions, from threat detection to goal prioritization, are being transferred to machines. And experts are sounding the alarm: if we don't stop in time, we may find ourselves in a situation where a person will simply sign what the AI has already decided.

Therefore, the main slogan of the conference is "man must remain at the center of the solution." It is necessary to maintain human control at all key stages. And this means abandoning the practice of "warning launch", when missiles launch even before the impact is confirmed. It is necessary to give more time for analysis in order to avoid a disaster due to a false alarm.

In addition, it is required:

- Transparency in how algorithms work.

- Training for operators so that they understand when the AI is lying.

- International rules — agreements on how and where AI can be used in nuclear systems.

Because the problem is not only in technology. It's also about speed. Modern conflicts are moving faster: drones, cyber attacks, autonomous systems. AI accelerates everything from detection to response. And this, combined with misinformation and panic, can lead to an unintended escalation — when one mistake leads to another, and as a result, the world finds itself on the verge of nuclear winter.

So yes, AI can make weapon control more accurate and safer. But without strict supervision, ethics, and international cooperation, it is equally likely to be the trigger.  

As Latiff said, he will enter into everything. The task of humanity is to prevent it from entering a place where it cannot be mistaken.

North Korea has issued an ultimatum: recognize us as a nuclear power, or remain silent

 

Kim Yo Jong

North Korea has once again loudly declared its ambitions: the United States must officially recognize it as a nuclear—weapon state, otherwise there will be no negotiations. Such a harsh message came not from Kim Jong Un himself, but from his influential sister Kim Yo Jong, who has long been one of the key figures in the regime and often makes harsh statements on behalf of the country's leadership.

According to her, any attempts by Washington to return to negotiations on denuclearization will now be perceived in Pyongyang as a "gross mockery" and a "mockery of reality." This is a direct signal: North Korea already considers itself a nuclear power, and it does not intend to retreat.

In recent years, North Korea has conducted dozens of ballistic missile tests, including intercontinental (ICBM) missiles capable of reaching the United States. It has also repeatedly demonstrated nuclear warheads and even announced the consolidation of the status of a nuclear power in the constitution. Now it requires international recognition.

This is an extremely uncomfortable situation for the United States. Recognizing the DPRK as a nuclear Power means undermining the global system of non—proliferation of weapons. But ignoring it risks escalation, especially against the backdrop of North Korea's strengthening ties with Russia and China.

So Kim Yo Jong's statement is not just rhetoric. This is an attempt to rewrite the rules of the game: instead of asking for a seat at the negotiating table, Pyongyang demands to sit down as an equal, with a nuclear bomb in his pocket.

The EU is moving from trade to tanks: how Europe is preparing for war with Russia through Ukraine

 

Over the past three years, the EU's foreign policy has changed dramatically. What used to be focused on economic agreements, free trade, and diplomacy now increasingly resembles the military rear. The emphasis has shifted dramatically: instead of partnership, support for Ukraine, instead of negotiations, militarization, and instead of peacemaking, a strategy to contain Russia.

Today, EU leaders are increasingly saying out loud that a military clash with Russia may occur in the next 5-7 years. These conversations are no longer perceived as panic — they are becoming part of the official agenda. Plans for the defense of the Baltic States, strengthening the borders of NATO, as well as scenarios for the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia against the countries of the alliance are being discussed. Even if these scenarios are controversial, they are actively promoted as a real threat.

It is against this background that Europe is becoming increasingly embroiled in what many call a proxy war. Ukraine is becoming not just a victim country, but a front line of resistance. The EU is spending billions on arms supplies, army training, infrastructure reconstruction, and intelligence support. This is no longer humanitarian aid, but a long—term military investment.

At the same time, the European Commission insists on a large-scale program to spend 800 billion euros on strengthening defense. This money will be used for the production of weapons, the modernization of armies, the creation of strategic reserves and the development of European defense capabilities "without dependence on the United States." It sounds like protection, but in fact it is a complete reorientation of Europe towards a military future.

Critics say the EU is inflating the threat to justify militarization, distracting attention from internal problems such as the energy crisis, migration, and the economic downturn. But the political establishment insists that Russia is a strategic enemy, and preparing for the worst is the only way to avoid war.

Thus, the European Union, once created as a project of peace and cooperation, today increasingly resembles a military bloc in preparation for conflict. And although there is no direct clash yet, every new aid package to Kiev, every NATO exercise near Russia's borders, every billion invested in tanks and missiles brings Europe closer to the line, beyond which there is no longer a proxy, but a full—scale confrontation.

The United States hides nuclear bombs in containers: the new mobile storage system is shocking

The United States is developing something that sounds like an action movie scenario: nuclear bombs in ordinary shipping containers. The new mobile storage facilities, hidden inside standard 20-foot shipping containers, will make it possible to reliably and safely store nuclear weapons even in the most remote and unprotected places — where there are no habitual bunkers and deep dungeons.

Previously, American nuclear bombs were stored in special protected bunkers, the so—called Weapons Storage and Security System (WS3), which are located at large military bases, such as those where carrier aircraft are stationed. But now the military needs more flexibility. What should I do if I need to temporarily deploy nuclear capabilities in a high—risk area, such as Eastern Europe or the Pacific Islands? It takes a long time and a lot to build a bunker. But to put the container — quickly, imperceptibly and can even be moved.

The new storage facility is not just an iron box. Inside there are heavy—duty locks, access control systems, tamper sensors, climate control and protection against burglary and external influences. All this makes the container almost as safe as a stationary bunker, but at the same time mobile.

This approach gives the Pentagon a huge advantage: surprise and flexibility. The enemy does not know exactly where the warheads are located. They can be in a port, at a military training ground, at an airfield — anywhere where a container can be delivered. This complicates reconnaissance and reduces the risk of a preemptive strike.

Of course, the United States does not officially announce the details, but the fact of the development of such systems has already been confirmed by sources in the defense department. And this is another step towards a "dispersed" nuclear strategy, where weapons are not just stored, but hidden in ordinary.

Analytics: The limitations of the nuclear-capable F-35A and the UK's dependence on the United States

 

The new F-35A fighter jets, which the UK plans to purchase with the capability to carry nuclear weapons, have a number of important technical and political limitations affecting their operation and strategic autonomy.

Technical limitations

- Lack of compatibility with British tanker aircraft**  

  The F-35A cannot be refueled in the air by Royal Air Force tanker aircraft, which limits their range and time on combat patrol without the support of American tankers KC-135 or KC-46.

- Dependence on US infrastructure  

  To perform long-range operations and maintain combat readiness, the British F-35A will be heavily dependent on American logistics and air resources.

 Political dependence

- US control over nuclear weapons  

  The nuclear bombs placed on the British F-35A remain under US control. The decision on the use of nuclear weapons will be made jointly, and the United States retains the right to approve or reject Britain's plans for their use.

- Limitation of strategic autonomy

  This dependence reduces the UK's ability to make decisions on its own in the field of nuclear deterrence, which reflects the peculiarities of transatlantic relations and the NATO alliance.

Although the acquisition of the F-35A with nuclear capabilities enhances the UK's defense capabilities, technical limitations and political dependence on the United States impose significant restrictions on the use of these capabilities. To increase Britain's strategic independence, it will require the development of its own refueling infrastructure and a review of nuclear arsenal control mechanisms.

The UK will purchase 12 nuclear-capable F-35A fighter jets from the United States

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will announce plans to purchase 12 F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear weapons from the United States at the upcoming NATO summit. This decision is aimed at strengthening the country's defense capability and increasing its contribution to the collective security of the alliance.

The fifth-generation F-35A fighters have advanced stealth technology, high maneuverability, and the ability to carry a wide range of weapons, including nuclear weapons. The purchase of these aircraft will allow the UK to modernize its fleet, replacing outdated models and increasing the level of deterrence of potential threats.

At the NATO summit, Prime Minister Starmer will call on the alliance's member states to increase their efforts to support collective defense and adapt to new security challenges, including growing tensions in various regions of the world. The United Kingdom is demonstrating an example of active participation in strengthening NATO's defense capabilities.

Earthquake in Iran: a natural disaster or a "silent" nuclear test?

An earthquake of magnitude over 5 on the Richter scale has occurred in the southern provinces of Iran. Its tremors were felt over a significant area, including areas where strategically important facilities of the Iranian nuclear infrastructure are located. However, not all experts tend to see this as a purely natural phenomenon. Some analysts and independent sources are wondering:  is this tremor the result of a secret nuclear test, which Tehran has long promised not to carry out precisely because of international pressure?

Suspicions are reinforced by the fact that:

- The location of the event is located near known nuclear facilities;

- The depth and nature of the tremors differ from typical seismic events in the region;

-The Iranian authorities do not provide exhaustive comments, limiting themselves only to mentioning a "natural accident."

Such coincidences make us recall past cases when nuclear tests were accompanied by artificially induced tremors. If the information about the testing is confirmed, it will become a direct challenge to international norms, especially for Israel, the United States and EU countries, which have repeatedly warned Tehran about the consequences of any step towards creating a combat nuclear potential.

US response: Will there be a nuclear response?

However, despite Washington's possible concerns, there should be no real military response in the form of a nuclear strike. The United States, despite its rhetoric, is extremely cautious about using nuclear weapons, realizing that this could lead to a global escalation. Instead, we can expect increased economic sanctions, an expansion of missile defense programs, as well as increased diplomatic pressure through the United Nations and other structures.

When states become tribes

Meanwhile, more and more observers are noting that  traditional geopolitical architectures are losing control of the situation. A world in which countries act as rational subjects of international agreements is becoming a thing of the past. Instead, a new reality is emerging, where national interests, ideology, and internal fears begin to play a greater role than logic and dialogue.

Iran is not the only example. We see this in other regions as well, where "states" are turning into collectives more similar to tribes, where it is not the interest in peace and progress that prevails, but the desire for survival, dominance and symbolic power.

It is in such a world that something that has not been possible for a long time becomes possible:  nuclear weapons tests, targeted strikes against nuclear facilities and an increase in tension to a level comparable to the times of the Cold War.

The fourth wave of Iranian missile attacks on Israel and the role of nuclear weapons in regional security

 

The fourth wave of Iranian missile attacks on Israel, which came in the early morning, again revealed the vulnerability of the Israeli air defense system, which missed a significant number of accurate hits. Before that, there were three more waves of attacks that were similar in results.. This raises serious concerns, because if Iran had at least several nuclear warheads, Israel would hardly have decided on recent attacks on Iranian facilities, since the likelihood that at least one charge would break through the air defenses and cause unacceptable damage would be extremely high.

The presence of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles in North Korea forces Washington to take into account its interests, but Iran does not yet have such a nuclear arsenal, which allows Israel and the United States to carry out aggressive actions without fear of a retaliatory nuclear strike. This is a bitter lesson for countries that disagree with Western policies.

Despite the fact that some of the Iranian missiles were intercepted, the accuracy of the strikes does not yet allow us to talk about serious damage in Israel, although some hits took place. The Israeli account of the missile war is significantly higher than the Iranian one, and if the Ayatollah regime really wants to have a significant trump card in negotiations with the United States, it needs to take more decisive steps, for example, to block shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

Otherwise, given the current balance of power and the vulnerability of Israel's air defenses, negotiations with Iranian interests in mind are unlikely. Thus, the situation remains extremely tense, and the presence or absence of nuclear weapons in Iran plays a key role in the strategic calculations of all parties.

The UK will build up to 12 new nuclear submarines and invest £15 billion in nuclear weapons

 

The UK government will announce a major defense review that plans to build up to 12 new SSN-AUKUS class nuclear attack submarines. These conventional-armed submarines will replace seven existing Astute-class submarines from the late 2030s. The new submarines will become a key element of modernizing the Navy and strengthening the country's combat readiness in the face of growing threats, including Russian aggression.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will stress the need for the armed forces to be on high alert to effectively contain the growing security challenges. In addition, as part of the program, the UK will allocate about 15 billion pounds for the development and production of nuclear warheads, which will be the largest investment in nuclear weapons since the end of the Cold War.

Defense Secretary John Healy noted that the new submarines will be equipped with modern technologies, which will significantly increase their combat potential. In addition to the submarine fleet, the review also focuses on the development of cybersecurity, digital technologies and the expansion of arms production.

The UK is negotiating with the United States on the purchase of F-35A fighter jets with the ability to carry tactical nuclear weapons

 F-35A Lightning II

Britain has begun "extremely delicate negotiations" with the United States on the acquisition of F-35A Lightning II fighter jets capable of carrying B61 tactical gravity nuclear bombs. This initiative is supported by Prime Minister Keira Starmer and is aimed at expanding the country's nuclear deterrent in the face of the growing threat from Russia.

According to The Sunday Times, the British government views the F-35A as the second pillar of its nuclear triad, along with the Vanguard-class submarines. These aircraft have a range of about 1,400 km, which exceeds the capabilities of other F-35 modifications, and can be used in scenarios that do not involve a full-scale nuclear war.

The planned purchase will be the most significant expansion of the British nuclear arsenal since the end of the Cold War. In preparation for this step, a strategic review of UK defence is being prepared, which should highlight the need to strengthen defence capabilities and increase transparency in response to the "immediate and urgent" threat posed by Russia.

The F-35A has already been certified to carry the upgraded B61-12 thermonuclear gravity bomb, making them dual—use aircraft capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear weapons. This is the first fifth-generation aircraft with this status, which highlights technological progress and the strategic importance of the platform.

The United States conducted tests of the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile

The US command has officially confirmed the scheduled tests of the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). The launch was carried out from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, and the warhead was sent to a training ground in the Marshall Islands — at a distance of about 7 thousand kilometers.

According to the US Department of Defense, such tests are a regular part of the program to ensure the reliability and combat readiness of the country's strategic nuclear forces. It is noted that the launch was carried out as part of pre-planned events and was not related to the current geopolitical situation or the actions of other states.

The Minuteman III missile has been in service with the United States since the 1970s and is a key element of the ground component of the country's triad of nuclear forces. At the moment, it is planned to replace it with a new system GBSD (Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent), which is being developed by Northrop Grumman.

Military experts emphasize that such tests demonstrate the ability of the United States to maintain a high level of nuclear capability and security guarantees to its allies. At the same time, representatives of the Pentagon note that information about launches is always provided in advance to comply with international obligations and transparency of actions.

North Korea conducted simulated nuclear strike exercises in response to an external threat

The Korean People's Army has launched a series of large-scale exercises aimed at practicing actions on the use of nuclear weapons in response to military aggression against the country. During the maneuvers, KN-23 short-range ballistic missiles were used, which were used to simulate nuclear strikes on targets located at a distance of up to 800 kilometers.

The KN-23 missile system, designed specifically to defeat tactical and operational targets, is capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads. According to analysts, it can also potentially be equipped with chemical weapons delivery systems, which makes it a versatile and dangerous element of the DPRK's strategic forces.

In addition to ballistic missiles, 600-mm multiple launch rocket systems KN-25 took part in the exercises, providing high-density fire support and capable of delivering massive strikes against front-line targets.

Special attention was paid to the testing of a new system called  "nuclear trigger" — the mechanism of management and control of North Korea's nuclear arsenal. It is assumed that this system ensures the rapid and coordinated deployment of nuclear forces in the event of a threat from external adversaries.

Such actions by the DPRK demonstrate the growing technological maturity of its military program and efforts to consolidate the status of a nuclear power, despite international sanctions and pressure.

Indo-Pakistani conflict 2025: escalation of tension and attempts at de-escalation

In April 2025, relations between India and Pakistan were strained again after a terrorist attack in Kashmir, organized by militants. In response, India launched airstrikes on positions in Pakistan, which were officially described as "terrorist camps." Islamabad has claimed the downing of five Indian planes, although video confirmation is still available for only one, a French Rafale fighter jet.

After that, Pakistan also launched missile attacks on Indian positions, claiming to have hit an airbase and a command post for a mechanized brigade. There is no official confirmation of these statements yet. The sides suffered losses: Pakistan reported 24 civilian deaths, while India reported the elimination of at least 17 terrorists and 10 of its citizens killed in retaliatory strikes.

Despite the harsh rhetoric, neither side is seeking a full-scale war. India declared the incident over, and Pakistan expressed its readiness to de-escalate, subject to guarantees of no further strikes. The Pakistani Prime Minister is expected to address the nation, which may be a signal of reducing tensions.

There is a clear division of positions in the international arena: the United States and Israel have taken a pro-Indian position, while Turkey has come out in support of Pakistan. The United Kingdom, while formally maintaining neutrality, plays the role of coordinator of Islamabad's actions. China, as usual, demonstrates cautious neutrality, interested in the conflict smoldering, as it prevents India from accelerating economic growth and becoming a "second China."

Thus, the current incident is more likely to serve as an example of limited military actions aimed at internal legitimization of power and external pressure, rather than the beginning of a full-fledged war. Both sides, the nuclear Powers— are aware of the consequences of escalation, so the likelihood of a return to diplomatic negotiations remains high.

France is ready to transfer nuclear weapons to Ukraine: Macron's unexpected statement

French President Emmanuel Macron made a sensational statement, saying that his country is ready to transfer nuclear weapons to Ukraine. According to Macron, this decision is due to insufficient support from the United States in the confrontation with the Russian aggressor Vladimir Putin. France, as one of the world powers with a nuclear arsenal, has declared its readiness to take responsibility for strengthening Ukraine's defense capability in the face of a growing threat from Russia.

Reasons for the decision

1. Lack of support from the United States:

- Macron stressed that France does not see sufficient support from the United States in the fight against Russian aggression. In his opinion, Washington is not actively involved in strengthening Ukraine's defense capability, which forces Paris to look for alternative ways to support Kiev.

2. Strengthening Ukraine's defense capability:

- The transfer of nuclear weapons, according to Macron, will be an important step in strengthening Ukraine's defense capability. This will allow Kiev to more effectively resist Russian aggression and defend its sovereignty.

3. France's responsibility:

- France, as one of the world's leading powers with a nuclear arsenal, is ready to assume responsibility for strengthening security in Europe. This decision underscores Paris' desire for stability and peace in the region.

The transfer of nuclear weapons to Ukraine could have serious consequences for global security. On the one hand, it can strengthen Kiev's defense capability and become a deterrent for Russia. On the other hand, such actions can lead to an escalation of the conflict and destabilization in the region.

Emmanuel Macron's statement about France's readiness to transfer nuclear weapons to Ukraine was an unexpected and sensational step. This decision underscores Paris' desire to strengthen Kiev's defense capability and stability in Europe. However, such actions can have serious consequences for global security and lead to an escalation of the conflict.

The US Air Force Base in England Renews The Possibility Of Storing Nuclear Weapons: Report

 

Recent intelligence data indicate that the Lakenheath Air Force Base, located in the United Kingdom, has regained the ability to store and maintain nuclear weapons. This information causes a wide resonance among experts on global security issues, since the base has not been used for these purposes for several decades.

The RAF Lakenheath Airbase, located in Suffolk County, has long been an important strategic facility for the US Air Force in Europe. In the past, it played a key role in the deterrence system during the Cold War, where nuclear munitions were stored for potential use in the event of an escalation of conflict. However, after the end of the cold war, many of these facilities were upgraded or repurposed, and their nuclear infrastructure dismantled.

According to a report published by defense policy experts, Lakenheath Air Base has undergone significant modernization aimed at restoring its ability to service nuclear weapons. These works include the installation of new security systems, the renovation of storage facilities and the improvement of runways to receive strategic bombers capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

Although Pentagon officials have not yet confirmed these data, observers note that such steps may be related to increasing tensions between the West and Russia, as well as China's growing interest in expanding its nuclear potential.

However, experts emphasize that long-term plans for storing nuclear weapons at the base remain uncertain. Perhaps Lakenheath will be used as a temporary point for the transfer of nuclear assets to Europe as part of NATO exercises or operations. An alternative scenario suggests that the modernization of the base is part of a broader program to upgrade the infrastructure to ensure compatibility with new types of weapons, such as cruise missiles with nuclear warheads.

The British Government has so far refrained from commenting on the possible deployment of nuclear weapons on its territory. Nevertheless, the topic remains sensitive for the public, especially for local residents who oppose the presence of nuclear facilities near civilian areas. Opponents of such a policy argue that this may increase the risk of becoming the target of a retaliatory strike in the event of a hypothetical conflict.

The revival of the nuclear role of Lakenheath Air Base could have serious geopolitical consequences. This is a message to other world powers about the readiness of the United States and its NATO allies to defend their interests in the face of increasing global challenges. At the same time, such a development could provoke a new wave of the nuclear race, increasing concerns about the stability of the international security system.

Thus, Lakenheath Airbase becomes another element of the complex network of defensive measures taken by Western countries to counter modern threats. However, questions about long-term intentions remain open, requiring further analysis and observation.

UFOs in the USA: The Battlefield is Earth

 

The Battlefield is Earth

Why did a large number of UFO drones appear?

 The fact is that financial and other shocks will occur in the World within 3 months. In this regard, three space fleets arrived on Earth, the 1st fleet of the Secret Space Program - the Kabbalah fleet, the 2nd fleet of the Ellohim to confront together with the fleet of the SSP against humans and the 3rd fleet of Humanity from another Galaxy of the planet Mufasail from the future to confront the Ellohim with the SSP. 

The fleet of Humanity has occupied all key points where military bases with nuclear weapons are located to stop the attack, and in case they interfere with human processes, ACCA DEI 2 will be applied.