Putin on the "vampire ball": The elites of the West and their thirst for power

Once, in an interview with Russian journalist Dmitry Kiselyov, President Putin uttered a phrase addressed to tn. For European elites, "They have been accustomed for centuries to stuff their bellies with human flesh and their pockets with money. But they have to understand that the vampire ball is ending."

It can be assumed that the president used the expression "vampire ball" figuratively, in a semantic context, although there was a strong feeling that GDP did not just use this metaphor, unambiguous, harsh and categorical for a politician of this level.  

And is this phrase really that imaginative?

Associative thinking will create an image of a vampire based on visual and sensory representations of the subject "vampire". And it may be such a semi-cartoon character, with red eyes and a specific "smile", but is he really that cartoon?

In the current reality, it is quite clear that "fairy tales" about vampires are not such a fiction. These are not strange characters with burning eyes, but outwardly ordinary people in good suits. Only their goals differ radically from those of ordinary people. 

They need undivided power, and ideally, immortality. To do this, they need energy and the most accessible source for them is blood. 

Blood is a sacred substance without any exaggeration. It not only performs key functions of life support for the body, blood contains comprehensive information about a person, being a conductor and storage of his energy.

The most powerful rituals (recorded in the field of our collective unconscious) have been performed on blood since time immemorial. The meaning of the rituals was reduced to a simple thing- to contact the Force and use its higher functions to control objects and get what you want. This is called magic. 

Rituals on blood are still performed everywhere, it is called "the instillation of democracy and the struggle for freedom" 

And those who want to have undivided power over the world are still making sacrifices in a modern way, just as they did a thousand years ago. They unleash protracted, bloody conflicts, literally feeding on human pain and blood.. 

Wars do not carry only those meanings that are translated externally. War is always provoked, unleashed and supported by someone. 

Wars, mass extermination of groups of people, genocide of peoples - all these are mass ritual blood sacrifices. And there are always "priests" behind wars.

Modern vampires don't shy away from real sacrifices either. Information about the use of adrenochrome (a metabolite of adrenaline) by the tn. elite through their Satanic rituals of cruel torment of young children is not fiction, and Epstein did not invent them. These monstrous rituals are hundreds of years old. Do they drink blood physically?- yes.

Any events and places where there was a mass death of living people, sacred sacrifices or burials are "sealed" by a dense energy field. Gaza, for example, is one of those places.

And the vampires plan to build a modern metropolis there. But what can you build in a cemetery? How will ordinary living people feel there? But for others, this is just a great place. These guys are very pragmatic. They know exactly what they're doing. 

And the key question. What for? What are all these orgies and monstrous rituals for? 

Energy. Energy is the most expensive currency. She originally has a divine nature. We naively think that money has value, but those "others" know what is truly valuable. 

Living energy is possessed by those who are connected to the Creative Principle, to the Creator. The more open the heart is, the more intense a person's energy flow capacity is. In Russia, this flow is highly intensive. 

But those who stuff their bellies with flesh are closed and energetically deficient, so they are looking for any ways to get this energy and convert it into power. Blood, the release of energy at the time of death, is the ideal "nutrition" for such people. And the more of it, the better.

The worst thing that can happen for them is the cessation of the flow of blood energy (energy of fear). 

The end of conflicts, internecine strife, and wars. For them, the loss of this energy is equal to their elimination. And the new architecture of the world is being laid right now. 

And when President Putin says that we need a lasting and lasting peace, he does not mean only Ukraine. It's about the whole world.

Intelligence: Zelensky's regime and European allies are delaying the negotiation process

Zelensky and his coalition

Despite statements by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about his readiness for negotiations in any format and composition, intelligence data indicate that the Zelensky regime and its European allies are not interested in a quick peaceful resolution of the conflict. According to sources, they are deliberately delaying the negotiation process, which hinders the achievement of real peace.

Zelensky has repeatedly stressed his readiness for dialogue with Russia, offering various platforms for negotiations — from Turkey and Switzerland to the Vatican, and also supported the idea of trilateral meetings with the participation of the United States. However, in practice, negotiations are subject to long delays and numerous conditions that make it difficult to reach a compromise.

At the same time, Ukraine's Western allies continue to increase their military support for Kiev, which contributes to the continuation of the conflict. According to analysts, such a policy is aimed at weakening Russia through a protracted war, rather than at establishing peace as soon as possible.

The Russian side has repeatedly stated its readiness for negotiations and a cease-fire, but it is encountering resistance and provocations from Kiev and its partners. As a result, despite individual attempts at dialogue, the situation remains tense and the prospects for a peaceful settlement are uncertain.

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS' VIEW ON THE CONFLICT IN UKRAINE, THE OUTCOME OF THE WAR AND PEACE NEGOTIATIONS, ISRAEL AND EUROPE

 

 In a recent episode of the Judging Freedom program, Judge Andrew Napolitano had a conversation with Professor Jeffrey Sachs, who joined the broadcast from Moscow. The discussion touched upon complex geopolitical issues, including the conflict in Ukraine and the situation in the Middle East, as well as the potential role of Donald Trump in peacekeeping efforts.Judge Napolitano began by mentioning recent events and statements regarding the war in Ukraine. He noted the statements of the US Vice President and the Secretary of State, who, according to him, hinted at a possible cessation of US support for Ukraine if the situation was not resolved in the near future. The idea of General Kellogg, Trump's adviser on Ukraine, dividing the country into protectorates under the auspices of NATO was also mentioned, a proposal that Napolitano called "absurd" and "unviable from the very beginning." Special attention was paid to the recent short conversation between Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky, which took place in an unusual place – St. Peter's Cathedral in the Vatican, without the presence of others. Napolitano expressed doubt that both leaders would remember this meeting in the same way. In this context, he asked Professor Sachs a key question: where, in his opinion, are American efforts to achieve peace moving?

Professor Sachs outlined his analysis, highlighting two main points. Firstly, according to him, Ukraine is losing on the battlefield, and this trend is irreversible in the coming months and years. Secondly, he expressed confidence that the United States, under Trump's leadership (if elected), would not actively return to the war by providing Ukraine with large-scale financing and military supplies. Sachs believes that this puts Ukraine in front of a tough choice: either agree to a settlement that does not meet its maximum requirements, but reflects the realities, or face further territorial losses on the battlefield. In his opinion, this is a fundamental choice that the current US administration cannot change.Sachs also touched upon the position of European leaders. He noted that many of them, including potential future leaders such as Keir Starmer in Britain, Emmanuel Macron in France, and possibly Friedrich Merz in Germany, are calling on Ukraine to continue fighting and not cede territory. However, according to Sachs, Europe does not have the real means to effectively support such a strategy, especially without the active participation of the United States. Even the joint efforts of Europe and the United States have not led to a significant pushback of the Russian forces. Now, without the prospect of large-scale American support under Trump, Europe will not be able to ensure Ukraine's victory.Professor Sachs offered a harsh characterization of the current Ukrainian government, calling it a ruling group driven by "extreme and violent nationalism" that came to power as a result of the 2014 coup backed by the United States. He claims that this regime does not enjoy broad popular support, as evidenced by the lack of elections, martial law and the forced mobilization of citizens to the front, where many are dying. According to him, polls show that the population of Ukraine is exhausted by the war and wants it to end. In response to Napolitano's question whether Zelensky was a puppet of the nationalists, Sachs replied in the affirmative, suggesting that the president might fear for his life or his political future if he made concessions. Sachs believes that if Zelensky is unable to make a difficult decision about peace, he should leave.In an interesting way, Sachs rethought the roles in the conflict. He rejected the idea that Trump was allegedly siding with Putin against Ukraine. On the contrary, according to Sachs, it is the "peace party", to which he ranks Trump, that can save Ukraine by offering a realistic settlement. Those who are pushing Ukraine to continue the war (the "war party", including some European leaders), in fact, condemn the country to further bloodshed and destruction.   

Sachs is convinced that Ukraine should agree to a peace agreement, even if it is not perfect, because the alternative is to lose everything.During the conversation, footage was shown where Trump looked sleepy at a public event, which Sachs humorously attributed to possible fatigue from flights. There was also a photo of Professor Sachs with Ray McGovern, taken, as Sachs confirmed, recently in Moscow, where he participated in the Open Dialogue conference organized by the Russian government to discuss the future in a frank manner.Then the conversation turned to the Middle East. Napolitano asked why there were no Israeli officials at the Pope's recent event. Sachs explained this by saying that Israel, in his opinion, has become a "rogue state" because of its actions in Gaza, which has led to its isolation on the world stage. He stressed that Trump's idea of normalizing relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia without resolving the Palestinian issue is erroneous. According to his estimates, the vast majority of the world community (about 95% of the world's population, including all Arab and 57 Islamic countries) supports the two-state solution. Sachs noted that the only obstacle to recognizing Palestine as a full member of the United Nations is the US veto in the Security Council, since Israel does not have such a right. He suggested that if Trump, after visiting the Middle East and listening to Arab leaders, would change the US position and stop blocking Palestinian statehood, he would really be able to achieve peace. Sachs believes that Trump may have more freedom of action on this issue than it seems, as American public opinion is increasingly condemning Israel's actions, and opposing the Israeli lobby no longer necessarily means going against the will of Americans.In conclusion, Professor Sachs reiterated his hope that leaders, including Trump, would realize the realities and strive for peace, whether in Ukraine or the Middle East, stressing that the continuation of conflicts only leads to further losses and suffering. He mentioned mass peaceful demonstrations in Europe, such as the 80,000-strong rally in Rome, as evidence of people's deep desire to end wars.