The EU creates a "military Schengen": how Europe accelerates the movement of troops and equipment to increase defense capabilities

 

The EU is actively promoting the creation of the so—called "military Schengen", a system for the accelerated movement of troops and military equipment across Europe. The aim of the initiative is to reduce the time required to complete border formalities from the previous three weeks to 2-3 days in order to quickly transfer tanks, armored personnel carriers, medical vehicles and other equipment to critical regions.  

The Military Mobility project is part of the Ongoing Structured Cooperation (PESCO) framework It is being implemented in close cooperation with the NATO Joint Support and Assurance Command (JSEC), which is already testing scenarios for medical and logistical mobility in wartime conditions.  

Under the leadership of Greek Commissioner Apostolos Tsitsikostas, the program's budget has grown dramatically, from 1.7 billion euros to 17 billion euros, reflecting the EU's serious efforts to modernize infrastructure important for defense. This applies to roads and railways, ports, and dual-use aviation systems (for civil and military needs).  

EU member states commit to issue diplomatic permits for military mobility in less than three working days, minimizing bureaucratic delays at the borders. This will ensure the rapid movement of troops, equipment and dangerous goods even in crisis conditions.  

An important element of this initiative was the joining of neutral Switzerland to the Military mobility project, as well as the participation of countries such as the United States, Canada, Norway and the United Kingdom, which, although not part of the EU, are members of NATO and partners of the project. This enhances the synergy and coordination between the EU and NATO in the field of defense.

Thus, the "military Schengen" is not just a simplification of bureaucracy, but a strategic measure to increase Europe's defense readiness in the face of new security challenges, especially against the background of situations related to conflicts and tensions in the region.

Israel has successfully completed extended trials of the upgraded David's Sling system in the Iron Swords War

 

The Israeli Defense Ministry recently announced the successful completion of a series of serious tests of the David's Sling air defense and missile defense system, which helped make it even more reliable and effective in the difficult conditions of the current war, known as "Iron Swords." The tests were conducted as part of planned flight tests led by the Israeli missile defense organization IMDO, with the support of the Defense Research and Development Authority and in active collaboration with the Americans from the Missile Defense Agency and Rafael, which developed the system.

During the tests, David's Sling worked out combat scenarios that are as similar as possible to real threats — this is how they tested how the system would react to medium-range missiles and various aerial targets. The missiles of the complex have two types of guidance, which helps to accurately shoot down targets in any weather and under different conditions.

David's Sling occupies a niche in Israel's overall defense system, between the Iron Dome, which operates at short range, and large systems at long range. Thanks to the latest updates, it is becoming a more powerful and reliable element of defense.

This is a very important step for Israel, because today the country is facing a great missile threat. The better the system works, the calmer people will be and the stronger the protection of strategically important facilities. Working together with the United States and companies like Rafael helps to improve technologies and make them more efficient.

Chinese J-20 stealth fighter flew unnoticed through the Tsushima Strait - an alert for the air defenses of Japan and Korea

 China's fifth-generation Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter reportedly flew unnoticed for the first time through the Tsushima Strait, a strategically important maritime corridor between Japan and South Korea. This strait is located in the air defense zones of both countries and is covered by radar systems, including the American THAAD missile defense systems. However, according to the Chinese state television channel CCTV and a number of international sources, neither Japan, South Korea, nor the United States have publicly reported on the recording of this flight, which indicates possible serious gaps in regional radar defense.

Analysts note that the J-20 used a low—altitude flight profile of about 30-100 meters above the water surface, which significantly reduces radar visibility due to a reflective surface of only 0.1–0.3 m2, making it virtually invisible to air defense systems on land and at sea. According to experts, the key J/FPS-3UG long-range radar on Mount Seburiyama in Japan was unable to detect this fighter, partly due to the lack of long-range control aircraft at that time.

This undetected overflight has caused concern in the region, as the Tsushima Strait is an important military—strategic hub providing communications between the East China Sea and the Sea of Japan, controlled by Japan, South Korea and supported by the United States. The flight of the J-20 demonstrates China's capabilities in the field of stealth technology and signals the need to modernize and improve the effectiveness of air defense and early warning systems in East Asia.

In addition to a political show of force, such a maneuver can be considered as a test of the tactical capabilities of the Chinese fighter in real conditions of radar counteraction and a check of vulnerabilities in the defense systems of neighboring countries. The absence of official denials or reactions from Japan and Korea may mean either the fact of an unnoticed flight, or caution in aggravating the situation.

Overall, this incident underscores the growing importance of modernizing regional defense infrastructure and the need for enhanced cooperation between Japan, South Korea and their allies to close gaps in the radar system and increase preparedness to respond to such threats.

 J-20

The US Army is preparing a new air defense and missile defense strategy — what to expect before 2040?

 

In about three months, the U.S. Army will officially unveil its new air and Missile Defense (Air Defense) strategy./ABM), covering the period up to 2040. This document will not just be another plan — it will define how the American army will protect its forces, allies and interests in an era when threats from the air and from space are becoming more complex, rapid and diverse.

Why is the strategy appearing right now?

Because the war has changed. What used to be a fantasy from science fiction is now reality.:

- Hypersonic missiles that fly at a speed of Mach 5+ and can maneuver, making them almost invulnerable to older air defense systems.

- Massive drone attacks — from cheap tactical UAVs to kamikaze missiles like the Shahed.

- Cruise and ballistic missiles of medium and short range, which can be launched from land, sea and even from submarines.

- Cyber attacks on air defense systems to blind radars or disable command nodes.

All this requires a completely new approach. And old systems like Patriot or THAAD, although effective, can no longer cope alone.

What will be in the new strategy?

The official document has not yet been published, but according to leaks and statements by officials, key areas can be identified.:

1. Integrated Air Defense/Missile Defense Network (IBCS)  

   Everything should work as a single organism: radars, missiles, drones and satellites — in one network. The goal is to "see once — strike from anywhere." If the radar in Germany detects a target, the missile can be launched by a system in Poland.

2. Lasers and railguns (DE M-SHORAD and IFPC-HEL)

The Army is actively testing combat lasers and electromagnetic guns (railguns). They are cheaper than missiles, can fire almost indefinitely, and are ideal for repelling drone and rocket attacks. By the 2030s, they can become the basis of tactical defense.

3. Satellite Tracking Network (Space-Based Sensor Layer)

Satellites will continuously monitor hypersonic targets from the moment of launch. This is the key to interception, because such missiles are difficult to detect from the ground.

4. Hybrid defense: from tactics to strategy 

   The strategy will cover all levels, from protecting a single infantry unit (using interceptor drones and mini-lasers) to global defense against intercontinental missiles.

5. Focus on China and Russia 

   The document will be clearly focused on competition with the great powers. The main scenarios are conflict in the Taiwan Strait, tensions in Europe and threats in the Indo-Pacific region.

6. Compatibility with allies  

   The new systems will be developed taking into account compatibility with NATO, Japan, South Korea and other partners. This is important for common defense and data exchange.

What is already working?

Some elements of the future strategy are already being tested:

- DE M-SHORAD— a 50-kilowatt laser mounted on a Stryker armored personnel carrier.

- IFPC Inc 2-I is a system capable of intercepting drones, missiles and artillery shells.

- LTAMDS is a new radar for Patriot capable of seeing hypersonic targets.

And what about the budget?

No way without money. The US Army is asking for billions of dollars to implement the strategy. But with shortages and rising costs for other programs (including cybersecurity and AI), priorities will have to be chosen.

Why until 2040?

Because a new generation of threats is on the way. By 2040, there may be:

- Hypersonic missiles with AI guidance.

- Autonomous drone packs.

- Orbital weapons.

- Electromagnetic pulses (EMP) as a means of mass destruction.

The US Army wants not just to catch up, but to get ahead.

 Result

A new air defense strategy/Missile defense is not just a defense plan, but a look into the future of war. It will show how the United States intends to stay ahead when the enemy can attack from land, sea, air, space and even from digital space.

When the document is released, the world will know how ready America is for a war that no one has seen before.

Denmark will complete the purchase of ground-based air defense systems by the end of 2025 with a choice between Patriot and SAMP/T and invest 3.4 billion dollars

Denmark plans to complete the acquisition of ground-based air defense systems by the end of 2025 with a total budget of about 25 billion Danish crowns (approximately 3.4 billion dollars). Among the long-range components, the country is going to choose in the fall of 2025 between the American Patriot system and the Franco-Italian SAMP/T system, and the contract for the entire purchase, including possible additions to short- and medium-range systems, is scheduled to be concluded by the end of the year.

Currently, Denmark has already selected and ordered three medium—range air defense systems - IRIS-T SLM (German), VL MICA (French-European) and NASAMS (Norwegian) — to provide multi-level protection. These solutions should be delivered and put into operation by the end of 2026, which is part of a plan to urgently and extensively strengthen the country's defense in the face of growing regional threats. IRIS-T SLM and VL MICA have been purchased, and NASAMS leased. The choice seems to be diversified and tactically advantageous, affecting different technological and production bases in order to reduce risks.

There is a lot of competition in the choice between Patriot and SAMP/T in the fall of 2025. SAMP/T is seen as a more integrated and efficient European solution with good performance and lower maintenance requirements, while Patriot is a well—known American system. A combination of both systems is possible, but a final decision is expected by the end of the year.

The Danish Ministry of Defense also plans to include additional short- and medium-range systems in purchases to complete multi-level air defense. The solutions and supplies are designed to rapidly strengthen the protection of critical facilities and the country's population.

Lockheed Martin launches prototyping center for control and surveillance systems in the Golden Dome missile defense project

 Lockheed Martin has announced the launch of a prototyping center, where possible control and surveillance solutions are being developed that will become a key part of the architecture of the Golden Dome missile defense system. This center will allow virtual testing and rapid prototyping of technologies to improve the detection and interception of missile threats as part of a large-scale project funded by the US Department of Defense.

The Golden Dome is a multi-level missile defense system that combines tracking satellites, kinetic interceptors in space and on Earth positions, powerful lasers and artificial intelligence for rapid reaction to missile launches. Lockheed Martin, as the lead contractor, is actively cooperating with other companies and partners to create effective control and surveillance modules that allow the system to detect and neutralize threats in a timely manner.

The launch of the prototyping center is an important step towards creating a full—fledged system, which, according to plans, should be tested by 2028. At the same time, the project is still under development, and the companies face the task of integrating many technologies and developments, including space interceptors that can shoot down missiles in the early stages of flight.

The US Army wants to strengthen its air defense and missile defense forces by 30% due to new threats

 

The US Army is going to increase its air and missile defense forces by about 30%," the commander of the Space and Missile Defense Command said. This decision is due to the fact that threats from countries like China and Russia are growing — they are actively strengthening their potential in space and developing new rocket technologies.

This increase in air defense and missile defense capabilities will help better detect, track, and intercept air and missile targets, which will enhance security both in space and on Earth. In addition, the command is working closely with allies and industrial partners to implement modern technologies faster and expand logistical support.

As a result, all this is aimed at making air and missile defense systems more reliable, operational and sustainable in the face of constantly changing challenges. An important part of this strategy is the development of new capabilities to protect against complex threats, including missiles and hypersonic weapons.

The head of the US Space Command is calling for the creation of orbital refueling stations to support satellites as China tests refueling systems

General Stephen Whiting, head of the US Space Command, advocates a fundamental change in the approach to supporting military satellites in space. He insists on the need to create orbital refueling stations and a reliable logistics base for space forces, similar to that which supports aviation and naval forces. Whiting notes that the future of military operations is increasingly linked to space, and in order to effectively manage and protect satellites, it is necessary to provide them with constant maintenance and refueling in orbit. He emphasizes that technological advances, including China's testing of satellite refueling systems, require the United States to keep up and create stable orbital logistics networks.

At the same time, the general points out that the space command should have at its disposal not only means of detecting and destroying threats, but also integrated systems for timely maintenance and replenishment of satellite equipment. This concept is seen as a key element of future space operations to ensure long-term sustainability and responsiveness in space.

Stephen Whiting emphasizes that the availability of effective logistics in space is equivalent to the importance of maintaining aircraft and ships of ground and naval forces, without which full-fledged and sustained military activity is impossible. The creation of orbital refueling stations will make it possible to extend the life of satellites, improve their maneuverability and ensure the continuity of their operation in the face of growing competition and threats from other countries, such as China.

Thus, the leadership of the US Space Command is already actively working on plans and programs that promote the development of such technologies, including cooperation with commercial companies, which will allow in the future to create the necessary infrastructure in space.

UK-Japan joint exercises: training F-35B pilots to work together in the Indo-Pacific region

 

The Ministry of Defense has updated data on the next step of Operation Highmast, where the Royal Navy's Carrier Strike Group 25 will focus on joint air operations in the Indo-Pacific region. Special attention is being paid to ensuring that British and Japanese forces hone joint operations with F-35B fighters, fifth—generation aircraft with the ability to take off and vertical landing (STOVL).

For the UK, this is a familiar technique: the F-35B has been in service since 2018, and they have a lot of experience using it. But Japan is just beginning to implement this platform in its naval forces and is still in the process of integration. The two countries are currently conducting joint exercises at sea, where pilots and maintenance personnel are training, working together, learning how to work together, and gaining experience for future operations.

These exercises are an important part of strengthening the military partnership between London and Tokyo. They show solidarity and willingness to jointly respond to various challenges in an increasingly strategic region. In addition, such training helps pilots and technicians better understand each other's work so that everything goes smoothly in real combat conditions.

In general, F-35B joint flights are not just a study, but a serious step forward in terms of strengthening security and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. Indeed, now that the world is becoming more and more complex from a military point of view, it is coherence and willingness to work together that help maintain balance and prevent conflicts.

Rheinmetall and Lockheed Martin want to build large-scale missile production in Europe together

 

The German company Rheinmetall and the American Lockheed Martin are planning to create a joint venture aimed at establishing large—scale production of missiles directly in Europe. Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger spoke about this in detail during a conference call on the results of the first quarter of 2025. He confirmed that Rheinmetall is going to hold a controlling stake in this new joint business.

The idea is to create a serious European center for the production of advanced missile systems in order to ensure stable supplies and not depend on external factors. Such an enterprise will help accelerate production, improve quality and strengthen Europe's defense capability in the face of growing threats.

Papperger noted that cooperation with Lockheed Martin is an important step, because the American partner has extensive experience and technology in the field of missile weapons. By combining resources and knowledge, companies will be able to work faster and more efficiently, creating modern solutions for NATO and partner countries.

Rheinmetall will retain control over the joint venture, which will allow it to direct the development of the project in line with the interests of European countries and maintain a high level of production. The launch of such a concern is part of Rheinmetall's global strategy to strengthen defense technologies and create reliable arms supply chains in Europe.

All this is happening against the background of an increasing demand for modern missile systems that require manufacturers to be highly technologically advanced and flexible. The Rheinmetall and Lockheed Martin joint venture should become a key player in the market, capable of meeting European security needs for many years to come.

General Burt: The Space Forces will decide in the fall on methods for tracking moving targets from orbit

 Lieutenant General Dianna M. Burt, deputy chief of the US Special Operations Forces for Cybersecurity and nuclear weapons, said that the Space Forces plan to complete an analysis of various options this fall on how best to track moving targets directly from orbit.  

According to her, it will still take time to develop the necessary technologies for precise guidance from space. She explained that they are now working closely with various commercial companies and industry partners to understand exactly what methods and approaches will help to implement the indication – that is, detection and tracking – of moving aerial targets from space.  

General Burt made this statement on August 4 at an event hosted by the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies at the American Aviation Agency (AFA).  

In short, the task is not easy: we need to find the best ways to "see" objects in space in real time that are flying fast and may be a potential threat, and do it from orbit. Detailed work is currently underway to understand which technologies will actually work and be able to become part of the defense system.

Lieutenant General Dianna M. Burt

Trump's "Last Chance": Witkoff flies to Moscow under sanctions deadline

Today is a busy day in American politics. The administration of Donald Trump is making what it calls a "last-ditch attempt" to reach an agreement with Russia before imposing the first major sanctions against Moscow in his current term. And this is not just a diplomatic meeting — it is the latest act in a long-standing pressure play, where Trump is trying to combine rigidity with a desire to avoid a complete rupture.

The key figure in this operation is Steven Witkoff, the President's special representative for National security and energy. He has already arrived in Moscow to meet with the Russian leadership. And the very fact of this visit is already a signal: Trump needs a result. And he was needed yesterday.

Why "last time"?

Trump, as you know, likes to set self-made deadlines. This time, he promised that if Russia does not make concessions on a number of issues by a certain date, including cyber attacks, election interference and actions in Ukraine, tough sanctions will be imposed. This deadline is just around the corner. And Witkoff is the last trump card that should prevent escalation.

But here comes an important point: who really needs it?

Who's afraid of whom?

At first glance, the United States is putting pressure on Russia. But the reality is increasingly looking the other way around. Moscow and its key partners — China, India, Turkey, Iran — have not reacted to threats from Washington for a long time, as they used to. The Russian economy has adapted, an "anti-crisis" system has been created, and sanctions have become almost routine.

Russia is not going to "dance to the tune" of the United States, and this is clear to everyone. Moreover, the Kremlin seems to expect these negotiations to fail. Why? Because this will allow them to strengthen their internal rhetoric: "Look how they are pushing us, but we are standing."

But Trump is risking much more.

Why is Trump losing?

Because his reputation is his main asset. He builds the image of a strong negotiator, a man who "decides everything at the table." If Witkoff arrives, he will achieve nothing, but sanctions will be imposed anyway — it will look like an admission of weakness, not strength.

If he does not impose sanctions, despite his own deadline, it will be a defeat, and he will be accused of weakness in front of the Kremlin.

So Trump is trapped.:  

"A deal?" "So he asked for the impossible."  

"No deal?" — So he couldn't come to an agreement.  

- Sanctions? — It will hit its own economy (due to rising energy prices).  

- Not sanctions? — They will be accused of betraying the allies.

What does Witkoff want?

Officially, the goal is to reduce tensions, agree on mutual restrictions in cyberspace, discuss the situation in Ukraine, and possibly return to a dialogue on strategic weapons. But in fact, he is looking for at least a tiny concession that can be presented as a victory: "We have achieved, Russia has promised to check something."

What will happen next?

If the negotiations fail, sanctions will be imposed. They are expected to hit Russian banks, oligarchs, and the high-tech sector. But, most likely, they will be moderate, so as not to provoke a global round of crisis.

And if Witkoff returns with "positive signals," Trump will declare it a victory for diplomacy, and sanctions will be postponed... for another time.

Output

It's not just a meeting. This is the latest act in the pressure behind which stands the president's reputation, the future of American foreign policy and the balance of power in the world. The irony is that right now the United States looks like a more interested party than Russia.

Britain into space: the first vertical rocket is ready to launch from its native land

What a turnaround — the UK is finally taking its first real step into space from its own territory. The aviation safety regulator, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), has officially granted permission for the country's first vertical rocket launch. And this is not some kind of scientific experiment, but a full-fledged commercial mission by a domestic company from the British cosmodrome.

The green light was given to Skyrora, a Glasgow—based company that has been working for several years to create environmentally friendly and inexpensive rockets for launching small satellites into orbit. Now they have official permission to launch their Skylark L rocket from the SaxaVord spaceport located in the Shetland Islands, the northernmost territories of the UK, where the wind blows stronger than anywhere else and the sky is almost always open.

What is Skylark L?

It is a suborbital rocket with a height of about 10 meters, capable of lifting a payload of up to 40 kg to an altitude of up to 1000 km. It uses environmentally friendly fuels based on hydrogen peroxide and kerosene, which makes it one of the cleanest in its class. Although Skylark L does not launch satellites into orbit (it requires a more powerful rocket), it is ideal for:

- Scientific experiments in microgravity.

- Testing new technologies in space.

- Fast and inexpensive launches for startups and universities.

Why is this historical?

Yes, the UK has already launched satellites, but always from other spaceports: from Baikonur, in Florida, to Kourou. And in 1971, when the Black Arrow rocket launched the Prospero satellite into orbit, it was the only launch from British soil — and it has not been repeated since. Then the program was shut down, and the country simply bought services from the United States and others.

Now, more than 50 years later, the UK is returning to the game — but in a new role: not as a superpower with nuclear missiles, but as an innovative player in the small launch industry.

What about the spaceport?

SaxaVord is a private spaceport under construction on the island of Unst, the northernmost of the inhabited Shetland Islands. This is an ideal place for launches: few people, minimal air traffic, and direct access to northern orbits, which are especially in demand for Earth remote sensing and meteorological observation satellites.

In addition to Skyrora, other companies are planning their launches, including Orbex and Saxon Space. SaxaVord is positioned as the European answer to the spaceports in New Zealand and Cape Canaveral.

What about the regulator?

A CAA permit is not just a piece of paper. It means that all aspects of safety — for people, the environment and air traffic — have been thoroughly checked. The CAA evaluated:

- Flight paths of the rocket.

- Emergency shutdown systems.

- Evacuation and emergency response plans.

- Environmental impact.

Now Skyrora can set a launch date — and, according to rumors, it could take place as early as the fall of 2025.

What does this mean for Britain?

This is the beginning of a new era. If everything goes well, the UK will be able to:

- To attract investments in the space sector.

- Create high-tech jobs in remote regions.

- Become independent from foreign spaceports.

And for Skyrora, this is a chance to enter the global small start—up market, which is now being actively explored by companies from the USA, New Zealand and Japan.

Interestingly, Skyrora was founded by Vitaly Artemyev, a native of Belarus. And it was the British innovation support system that allowed him to realize his dream. Now his rocket, assembled in Scotland, with British funding and permission, will become a symbol that a small country can reach great heights — literally.

Japan and 9 countries train together to defend space: international space defense exercises in Australia

 

The Japan Air Self-Defense Forces took part in a large international command and staff training on space defense, which took place in Australia. It was attended by representatives of 10 countries, all with the common goal of strengthening friendship and cooperation in protecting space from threats.

The main idea of these exercises is to work out a joint response to any problems in space that may disrupt the operation of satellites, communications and navigation. During the training, the countries exchanged experiences and identified all the weaknesses in order to work as a single mechanism in the face of a real threat.

This is a very important event for Japan, because now space has become very complex and even dangerous — there are many satellites, and there is a risk that someone may use space for military or cyber purposes. By working together with other countries, solutions can be found and defended faster.

During the exercises, they worked out models of real threats: how to disrupt communications, how to protect themselves from cyber attacks on satellite control. Experts from various fields worked with the participants, from space surveillance to system protection.

Such cooperation is necessary now, because a lot depends on satellites in the army and in civilian life. The better countries are friends and help each other, the safer space and, in general, the planet becomes.

For Japan, participating in such events is a way to gain valuable experience working together and show everyone that it is a serious player in global security and is ready to protect our common interests together with its allies.

The Wolf 25 AD is a Slovak mobile vehicle for effective combat against drones in modern aerial combat conditions.

Wolf 25 AD

The Slovak company DefTech has revealed its new miracle, the Wolf 25 AD combat vehicle, which was created specifically to combat drones. This machine is a very important solution for modern conditions where threats from the air change literally on the move.

The Wolf 25 AD is an armored 4x4 vehicle with enhanced mine protection. It was made at the initiative of Ukraine to help protect artillery and command posts from drones. The machine has passed all the tests and is already operating in Ukraine, where it has received good reviews.

Its engine is powerful — 450 hp diesel, maximum speed is up to 100 km / h, travels up to 700 km without refueling. The car weighs about 8 tons, has good protection and suspension to drive on difficult roads. A team usually consists of 4-5 people: a driver, a commander, a technician and a gunner.

The most interesting thing is the armament. On the roof stands the Mangart 25 AD turret with a 25 mm Oerlikon automatic cannon. It can fire very fast — up to 650 rounds per minute. The guns use special projectiles that explode in the air next to the drone, scattering fragments and destroying the flying device. If you miss, the projectile disappears after a few seconds, so as not to damage anything unnecessary. In general, a real "trap" for drones is being created around the car.

In addition, the car has 4 radars with a 360—degree view - they are made by the German company Rheinmetall. They can simultaneously monitor up to 150 aerial targets: small quadrocopters can see from 5 kilometers, and airplanes from 20. These radars are cooled by water and require separate power, but it is thanks to them that the machine catches drones so effectively.

The Wolf 25 AD is not just an anti—aircraft gun, it is a real mobile air defense system that is easily transported and quickly deployed. It is lighter and more maneuverable than its counterparts, such as the American IM-SHORAD. It can be used for various tasks, from protection to reconnaissance and fire support.

The car is currently undergoing large-scale tests in Ukraine, and judging by the reviews, it is performing well. After the tests, the issue of orders and deliveries in large batches will be resolved. This is a very promising complex, especially for the countries of Eastern Europe, where the threat of drones has increased dramatically.

Australia to Acquire Futuristic Japanese "Mogami" Frigate — A Historic Leap for Japan's Defense Industry

In a major strategic shift, Australia has selected Japan’s advanced "Mogami"-class frigate as the foundation for its next-generation naval fleet. This isn’t just a large procurement deal — it’s a historic milestone. If finalized, it will mark Japan’s first-ever export of a warship since World War II, representing a breakthrough for a defense industry long restricted to the domestic market.

What Is the "Mogami"?

The "Mogami"-class frigates (FFM — Multi-Purpose Frigate) represent the cutting edge of Japanese naval engineering. Designed for the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF), these vessels combine high automation, advanced stealth technology, long operational range, and modular architecture, allowing rapid reconfiguration for missions ranging from anti-submarine warfare and mine countermeasures to patrol and air defense.

Key features include:

- Crew of just 90 — remarkably small for a 130-meter warship, made possible by high automation, reducing manpower needs by nearly half compared to similar vessels.

- Ultra-low observability (stealth design) — the hull and superstructure are engineered to minimize radar, infrared, and acoustic signatures.

- Modular combat system — allows quick reconfiguration of weapons and sensors for different mission profiles.

- Operational range exceeding 9,000 km — ideal for patrolling the vast expanses of the Pacific and Indian Oceans.

Why Did Australia Choose the "Mogami"?

Australia plans to replace its aging Anzac-class frigates, and the new vessels must be modern, reliable, cost-effective to operate, and interoperable with allied forces, particularly the US and UK.

The "Mogami" fits these requirements perfectly. Additionally, Japan is a key strategic partner for Australia in countering China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. Operating similar ship classes simplifies joint exercises, logistics, and potential combined operations.

For Australia, this also offers an opportunity to reduce reliance on traditional suppliers like the US, UK, or France, and diversify its defense partnerships.

What Does This Mean for Japan?

For Japan, this is revolutionary. After WWII, the country effectively banned arms exports under a strict interpretation of its pacifist constitution. It wasn’t until 2014 that the Abe government relaxed these restrictions, opening the door to defense exports — but no major deals followed.

Selling the "Mogami" to Australia would set a precedent. It would prove that Japanese defense technology is competitive on the global stage. A successful deal could open doors to other nations — such as Canada, New Zealand, or Southeast Asian countries — seeking advanced, reliable platforms.

What’s Next?

Final negotiations are underway. Australia is considering **partial domestic construction** of the frigates, involving Australian shipyards and industry. This would create jobs and boost local defense manufacturing.

If all goes according to plan, the first Australian "Mogami"-class frigate could enter service by the mid-2030s.

The Bottom Line

Acquiring the "Mogami" frigates is more than just a fleet upgrade. It’s a geopolitical signal: Australia and Japan are deepening their alliance to meet regional challenges. Meanwhile, Japan is finally stepping onto the global stage — as a serious player in the international defense market.

Project Pandora: How the US and USSR Spied Not Just on Diplomats, But on Their Minds

At the height of the Cold War, when the arms race had reached space, the US and the USSR launched another, secret competition—one on the edge of science and science fiction. This wasn’t about bombs or missiles, but about controlling the human mind using invisible waves. At the heart of this dark chapter stood Project Pandora, a classified US government program aimed at discovering whether human thought, emotion, or even behavior could be manipulated simply by directing microwaves at the brain.

The Beginning: The "Moscow Signal" and the Mysterious Beam

It all started in 1953, when the US Embassy in Moscow detected a strange phenomenon: the building was constantly bombarded by a low-intensity microwave signal. The Soviets claimed it was just radio interference or an attempt to jam surveillance devices—essentially, “We’re not spying on you, but we won’t let you spy on us.” But in Washington, fears ran deeper: what if this was a secret mind-control experiment? What if the beam wasn’t just eavesdropping—but directly affecting the brain?

This irradiation continued for 23 years, from 1953 to 1976. Embassy staff reported headaches, insomnia, anxiety, and even tumors. They became known as victims of the "Moscow Signal syndrome." The US government long downplayed the risks, claiming the "rays were harmless," yet still paid hazard pay and eventually shielded the building—as if it were radioactive.

Project Pandora: When Science Entered the Game

By the mid-1960s, alarm had reached a peak. American officials realized: if the USSR could do this, the US needed to understand how it worked. So in 1965, Project Pandora was born, initiated by ARPA (the predecessor of DARPA) and supported by the CIA. The official goal: study the biological effects of microwaves on humans and animals. The real one: determine whether mind-control weapons could be developed.

The program ran until 1970, but its consequences are still felt today.

What Did They Do?

Scientists conducted brutal experiments, mostly on monkeys. Animals were exposed to microwaves of varying frequencies to observe changes in behavior, brain activity, and health. The results were alarming:

- Monkeys became lethargic, disoriented, and forgot routine tasks.

- Some showed memory loss and aggression.

- Cases of damage to the blood-brain barrier—a critical defense protecting the brain from toxins in the blood—were documented. This could lead to chronic neurological diseases.

But the most shocking discovery was the Frey Effect.

The Frey Effect: Hearing Voices That Aren’t There

In 1961, biophysicist Allan Frey discovered something incredible: at certain microwave frequencies, people hear sounds directly inside their heads—clicks, buzzes, even words—without any external source. No headphones, no speakers. This happens because pulses heat brain tissue, creating a "sound wave" inside the skull.

For the military, this was a gift. Imagine: you could transmit messages directly into an agent’s mind—no radio, no phone. Or, conversely, drive an enemy into paranoia by making them hear voices whispering: "You’re alone. No one trusts you. Run."

This effect became the core focus of Project Pandora. Could it be used for:

- Psychological warfare?

- Covert control?

- Creating the "perfect agent" through remote suggestion?

What Happened Next?

Officially, Project Pandora was shut down in 1970. But as often happens with such programs, closure didn’t mean the end. Researchers believe the work continued under other names.

Among the likely successors were classified programs such as:

- Project Bizarre—studying paranormal phenomena and telepathy.

- SLEEPY LAGOON—experiments with hypnosis and sleep.

- Active Denial System—the "heat ray" using millimeter waves to create a painful burning sensation on the skin (non-lethal, but excruciating).

Pandora in the 21st Century: When the Whole World Is a Transmitter

Today, technology has advanced far beyond. We no longer need giant antennas near embassies. We carry transmitters ourselves—in smartphones, smartwatches, and voice assistants. Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 5G—all create a constant electromagnetic field around us.

Agencies like DARPA are already working on:

- Neural interfaces that read thoughts directly from the brain.

- Remote emotion analysis systems using micro-facial movements or voice patterns.

- Cognitive overload technologies capable of disorienting or suppressing willpower.

And all of this is directly descended from Pandora.

Why Is This Important to Remember?

Project Pandora isn’t just a scary story from the archives. It’s a warning. It shows how easily science can be used not for progress, but for control, manipulation, and suppression. It raises questions we still can’t answer:

- Where is the line between security and surveillance?

- Who should control technologies capable of influencing the mind?

- Or maybe they’re already being used—and we just don’t know?

The shadow of Pandora still looms over discussions about **neuro-weapons, psychotronic technologies, and ethics in intelligence**. And as long as humanity has power and technology, the temptation to control the human mind will remain.

Being watched from above: The United States is preparing a network of satellites to track any movement on Land and at sea

 The American Space Force is taking a giant step into the future of exploration. Next year, they plan to launch a new generation of satellites capable of tracking any moving targets on earth and in the ocean — from tanks and columns of equipment to ships and submarines. This was stated by Lieutenant General DeAnna Burt, Deputy Chief of Space Operations for Cybersecurity and nuclear Weapons, during a speech at a virtual discussion organized by the Mitchell Institute.

This large—scale project is the result of the joint work of the US Space Forces and the National Directorate of Intelligence (NRO). This is not just another satellite constellation, but a full-fledged integrated tracking system that should dramatically enhance the Pentagon's combat capabilities in a modern war where speed and accuracy of data decide everything.

According to Burt, the first satellites with the function of tracking ground targets have already been launched and are in orbit. We are talking about a system known in the Pentagon as GMTI (Ground Moving Target Indication) — an indication of moving ground targets. This means that satellites can "see" and track the movement of vehicles, even if they are trying to hide under trees or in urban areas.

Technologically, this is achieved through a combination of electro—optical sensors (in fact, ultra—precise cameras) and low-level radar capabilities - that is, radars capable of "shining through" clouds, smoke, and even partially vegetation. Such systems have already been used on reconnaissance aircraft, such as the E-8C JSTARS, but now they are moving into space - and this is a game changer.

An equally important front is the airspace. The Space Force is already working on a separate but interconnected program to track targets in the air. According to General Burt, an analysis of alternative options for such a system will be completed by the fall of this year. The goal is to create a satellite network capable of detecting not only large aircraft, but also drones, cruise missiles, and hypersonic targets that traditional radars often miss.

This is especially true at a time when Russia and China are actively developing hypersonic weapons capable of maneuvering and flying at high speed, making them almost invisible to ground-based air defense systems.

Imagine the picture: at any moment, the Pentagon can receive live video from orbit showing how a Russian convoy is moving to the border of Ukraine, how a Chinese destroyer is sailing into the South China Sea, or how Iranian drones are preparing to take off. Such data allows you to make decisions in minutes, not hours, and prepare in advance for a possible threat.

In addition, the satellite network makes possible an automated warning system that automatically detects suspicious movements and sends signals to the command. This is the next level of smart warfare.

Previously, space was an auxiliary element. It is now becoming the main arena of intelligence and deterrence. The US Space Force no longer just monitors rocket launches — it creates a permanent "all-seeing eye" over the planet.

And although the details of the project are still classified (including the exact timing of launches and the number of satellites), one thing is clear: we are entering an era when it is almost impossible to hide from the view from above.

Mossad is no longer just for men: for the first time, Israeli intelligence is openly looking for women to serve

Imagine this: an elite spy agency, known for its top secrecy, publishes advertisements on social networks, websites, and even universities. This is not a new blockbuster scenario — it's a reality. For the first time in its history, Mossad, the legendary Israeli foreign intelligence service, is launching a public campaign to recruit women into the national service. And this is a huge breakthrough for an organization that has preferred to remain in the shadows for decades.

Previously, the Mossad only knew about the national service program by hearsay. It existed for more than 20 years, but it worked quietly: several talented girls were selected every year, not knowing exactly where they were going. It was like in a spy movie — a call, a secret meeting, logic tests, stress tolerance, and, of course, a polygraph. No ads, no open vacancies.

But now everything is changing. The Mossad is officially opening its doors — and it's doing it in a big way. The goal is to attract more young women from different backgrounds so that they can take on practical roles in a variety of fields, from cyber intelligence and data analysis to field operations and technology projects.

Why now? The answer is simple: the world has changed, and so has intelligence. Modern challenges — cyber attacks, disinformation, and complex international networks — require not only strength, but also flexibility, creativity, and a different perspective on the problem. And women, as practice shows, are often better at analyzing, communicating, and working under stressful conditions. "We realized that talent is not a matter of gender, but a matter of potential," the agency said, without naming specific names.

What started as a small pilot project with a couple dozen participants per year has now turned into a large-scale program involving hundreds of girls. They undergo intensive training, work in multidisciplinary teams, and participate in real—world operations - albeit not always with guns in their hands. Someone is hacking into servers, someone is analyzing satellite images, someone is conducting surveillance in Europe under cover.

It is also interesting that the Mossad is now actively looking for candidates in universities, technology parks and startup centers. They are looking not only for those who want to be "Agent 007", but also for programmers, mathematicians, psychologists, and translators. The main thing is intelligence, discipline and dedication to the country.

This step is not just a personnel initiative. It is a symbol of change in one of the most closed organizations in the world. The Mossad recognizes that in order to stay one step ahead of its enemies, it is necessary to use the full potential of society. Even if this potential is in a woman who never thought that she would be scouted.

Of course, serving in the Mossad is not a 9-to-5 job. These are years of secrecy, stress, moral dilemmas, and risk. But for many girls, this is a chance to make a real contribution to the security of the country, undergo unique training and become a part of something bigger.

Fighting breaks out in Aleppo: Kurds from the SDF accuse pro-government forces of the attack

 

Tensions in northern Syria have escalated sharply: armed clashes broke out in Aleppo province on Monday morning between the Kurdish Democratic Forces (SDF) and Syrian government forces. According to the SDF, four of their positions were attacked by groups that allegedly operate under cover or in the interests of Damascus.

The incident occurred in the context of a fragile and unstable balance of power in the region. The SDF, mainly composed of Kurdish units, controls a significant part of northeastern Syria, including areas of Aleppo, despite constant pressure from Turkey, pro-Iranian forces and the Syrian government itself. This time, the attacks, according to representatives of the SDF, were aimed at positions in the suburbs and rural areas of the province, where the Kurds are trying to maintain control, despite the efforts of Damascus to expand its influence.

The SDF officially stated that they responded to the shelling and joined the battle to repel the attack. There have been no reports of large-scale casualties so far, but shots and explosions can be heard in the region. Local sources report on the movement of military equipment and the evacuation of civilians from areas bordering the combat zone.

What is particularly worrying is that such clashes between the SDF and the Syrian government forces are occurring more frequently. At the same time, Damascus does not formally declare war on the SDF, but supports various pro-Kurdish and pro-government militias that periodically provoke conflicts. This is part of a broader strategy to weaken the position of the Kurds, who, although they do not seek independence, actually govern their territories autonomously, which does not suit the centralized government in Damascus.

In addition, the situation is complicated by the intervention of external players. The SDF works closely with the United States and the international coalition against ISIS, making them a target for Iran and its allies in Syria.

Against the background of these battles, observers note that Syria is increasingly turning into a field between local forces, where real battles are fought not directly by armies, but by their groups. This allows the official parties to maintain a semblance of stability, while on the ground there is a constant struggle for resources, roads and strategic heights.

So far, neither the Syrian government nor its allies have commented on the attack. However, earlier, Damascus has repeatedly stated that "the entire territory of Syria should be under the control of the state," which, in fact, means refusing to recognize any autonomy, including the Kurdish one.

USS Michael Monsoor suffers wear and tear: new photos of the Zumwalt-class destroyer raise questions about its future

 There are fresh photos of the destroyer USS Michael Monsoor (DDG 1001), one of the most modern ships of the US Navy from the Zumwalt class. They have again raised a wave of discussions on social networks — there are very noticeable changes in the color of the hull, traces of rust and damage on the composite hull from which the ship is made.

These pictures were taken when the destroyer entered the port of Yokosuka in Japan, where the US Navy command in the region is based. Many Internet users, especially the Japanese, joked that the ship looked more like an old wreck than a new high-tech warship. Others worried that such a worn-out hull could damage an important special function of the Zumwalt — to be invisible to radars.

Zumwalt are unique destroyers with composite hulls that reduce their radar visibility and make them difficult targets for the enemy. But, as it turned out, caring for such "know-how" is not so easy. Corrosion and damage to the case raise questions: how long the ship will be able to serve and how much resources will be required to take care of it.

In general, the photos raised an important question — is the US Navy coping with the support of such state-of-the-art ships? And will these exclusive destroyers really be able to maintain their best performance in real service for a long time?

Former military and officials launch initiative to create separate U.S. Cyber Forces

 

On Monday, a group of former senior civilian and military leaders specializing in digital security announced the launch of a large—scale initiative, the Commission for the Formation of U.S. Cyber Forces. Her goal is to work out in detail exactly how America should create a separate military branch dedicated entirely to cyberspace.

This commission is designed to propose specific ways that Congress and the White House can follow when deciding on the creation of a new structure. According to one of its co—chairs, Josh Stiefel, a former professional staff member of the House Armed Services Committee, the commission plans to complete the bulk of its work before adopting the defense budget for next year, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which will be a key moment for a possible legislative solution.

"Now is the right time, especially with this administration that I left, to do this," Stiefel said in an exclusive interview with Recorded Future News. "I believe that now there is a chance to draw attention to this issue and make real progress." He currently holds the position of Vice president of Government Relations at Second Front, a defense technology and cybersecurity company.

The Commission was created as a result of a partnership between the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and the Commission on Cyberspace Solarium 2.0. It includes 17 experts representing a wide range of expertise:

- Former top Pentagon and intelligence officials, including Michael Salmeyer, the first head of Pentagon cyber policy to be confirmed by the Senate, and Georges Barnes, who held a second position at the National Security Agency (NSA).

- Retired commanders of cyber forces of all kinds — land, air force, naval and space forces, including Admiral Michael Gilday, former Chief of Naval Operations.

- Experts from the private sector and academia.

The commission is co-led by retired Lieutenant General Ed Cardon, former commander of the Army Cyber Command, along with Stiefel. He emphasizes that the commission's goal is to speed up the decision, because "the threat is growing, technology is developing at breakneck speed, and we cannot sit for four or five years thinking about how to do this."

The initiative comes at a critical moment for U.S. cyber forces:

- President Donald Trump unexpectedly fired the head of the US Cyber Command four months ago, and no replacement has been appointed since.

- The long-awaited reform called Cyber Command 2.0, designed to strengthen the combat readiness and autonomy of the cyber forces, has been sent for revision, and many believe that the project is essentially dead.

- Bipartisan discontent is growing on Capitol Hill over the fact that the existing branches of the armed forces cannot provide Cyber Command with enough trained cyber fighters capable of countering opponents such as China, Russia or Iran.

The situation reached a boiling point last year when Congress included a provision in the defense law obliging the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) to conduct an independent assessment of the feasibility of creating separate Cyber Forces. The results of this study are expected to be ready by the end of 2025.

But the Stiefel and Cardona commission does not want to wait. She strives to stay ahead of academic research and already now propose practical, politically feasible solutions that can be implemented in the NDAA bill.

What are "Cyber Forces"?

The idea is simple but radical: to separate cyber operations from other branches of the armed forces and create a sixth independent military corps — along with the army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Space Forces. Such forces will be:

- Have your own command, budget and career system.

- Specialize exclusively in cyber warfare, infrastructure protection, and offensive operations in the digital space.

- Be able to adapt quickly to new threats without depending on the bureaucracy of other departments.

The Commission has already started its work: it holds hearings, analyzes international experience (for example, cyber structures in Israel, Great Britain and Estonia) and develops models for future organization.

If they succeed in convincing Congress and the White House, 2026 could be the year of the birth of the official US Cyber Forces, a new milestone in the evolution of national defense.

Germany throws fighter jets into Poland: Eurofighter on guard at the border with Belarus

Germany took a decisive step — five Eurofighter Typhoon fighter jets landed at the Lask airbase, which is just a couple of hours east of Warsaw. This is not just another training transfer. The deployment took place just before the high-profile joint military exercises of Russia and Belarus, scheduled for September. And the signal that Berlin is sending is very clear: "We are with our allies, and we will not let you play out the scenario on our territory."

These five Typhoons are not just beautiful airplanes with German crosses on board. They are now part of the permanent grouping of German troops in Poland, which already includes two batteries of Patriot anti-aircraft missile systems, as well as additional aircraft and technical support. In other words, we are talking about a full-fledged air group capable of both intercepting targets and covering its troops and allies in the event of an escalation.

A spokeswoman for the German Air Force bluntly stated: "This deployment is a clear signal of allied solidarity within NATO and a reliable means of deterrence and protection of the common airspace." Simply put, "we are here, we are together, and if someone does something wrong, they will be rebuffed."

The background for this step is the increasingly tense situation on the eastern flank of NATO. Russia and Belarus have announced large-scale joint exercises "Slavic Brotherhood" or "Zapad-2025" (the exact name has not yet been announced), which will be held on the territory of Belarus. According to the plans, tens of thousands of troops, tanks, aircraft, and possibly even missile systems will be involved there.

But Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia are watching these maneuvers with concern. It's no secret that they are afraid: what if these exercises will become a cover for real aggression? Especially considering how Russia used the "exercises" before invading Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2014 and 2022. There are fears that the troops who arrived "for the exercises" simply will not leave — and a new phase of the conflict will begin, already on the borders of NATO.

That is why Germany, as one of the key players in Europe and a member of NATO, decided not to wait. Placing a Eurofighter in a Weasel is not just a technical exercise. This is a demonstration of readiness for action. These fighters can intercept enemy aircraft, escort reconnaissance vehicles, and, if necessary— participate in combat operations. And the presence of Patriot adds a layer of defense: they are capable of intercepting ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as aircraft.

In addition, Germany is showing that it is taking on more responsibility for the security of Eastern Europe. Previously, the United States and the Baltic countries had borne the brunt in this area. Now Berlin is clearly strengthening its presence — and this may be the beginning of a new strategy.

 Moscow continues to pump Belarus with troops and equipment, and the West will strengthen its position.

September will show what happens next. When the exercises of Russia and Belarus begin, it will be especially hot in the skies over Eastern Europe, both literally and figuratively.

Waiting for the "Oreshnik": Russia closes the sky over Kapustin Yar, Medvedev threatens new steps

 

For the past day, observers have been closely monitoring the situation in the southern part of Russia. From August 4 to August 8, 2025, Russia closed the airspace over the Kapustin Yar military training ground located in the Astrakhan region. The restriction zone also affects a part of the Volgograd region. Such measures, as noted by the media, often precede major tests or missile launches.

This step is particularly alarming in Ukraine and in the West, because the Kapustin Yar test site is closely linked to the new Oreshnik medium-range hypersonic ballistic missile. It was from here, according to assumptions, that the first launch of this rocket was carried out. Recall that in February 2022, the airspace above the training ground was also closed before Russia attacked a military facility in Dnepropetrovsk with an Oreshnik missile. It is believed that the maximum flight range of the Oreshnik can reach 5,500 km, and its speed is up to 10-12 mach.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has not yet commented on the sky closure. However, these actions coincided with important political statements. On the same day, August 4, the Russian Foreign Ministry announced the lifting of a voluntary moratorium on the deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles. In response, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev said that further steps should be expected after this decision. He called the lifting of the moratorium a response to the anti-Russian policies of NATO countries and urged the West to "expect" the consequences.

It is possible that the closure of the zone above Kapustin Yar may indicate readiness for a new attack. While there is no official confirmation of the purpose of the current restrictions, the combination of the closure of the landfill and loud statements by Russian officials creates a tense atmosphere and makes us think about the possible consequences.

QinetiQ received $26 million for "smart" systems for American nuclear submarines — what does this mean?

A major order in the world of underwater military equipment: QinetiQ US, a well-known supplier of advanced defense technologies, has signed subcontracts with General Dynamics Electric Boat for a total of about $ 26 million. What's behind this? Very serious things — we are talking about the supply of modern electrical and electromechanical systems for two key classes of American nuclear submarines — Virginia and Columbia.

This was officially announced by QinetiQ itself, and judging by the wording, it's not just about wires and relays, but about high-tech components that provide vital functions* on board submarines. We are talking about systems responsible for energy distribution, motion control, on-board sensors, navigation, and possibly even some of the stealth and communications systems.

This multi—year agreement is not a one-time order, but a long-term deal in which QinetiQ will not only produce, but also test and supply these components throughout the contract period. All work will be carried out at QinetiQ's own production facilities in the United States — this is important from the point of view of national security and compliance with the strict standards of the Ministry of Defense.

Who are the players?

- General Dynamics Electric Boat is a legendary shipyard that has been building submarines for the U.S. Navy for over a century. They are responsible for the assembly and integration of the Virginia-class submarines (attack multipurpose boats) and Columbia (the latest strategic missile carriers designed to replace the aging Ohio fleet).

- QinetiQ US is a subsidiary of the British QinetiQ, but operates as an independent supplier in the USA. Specializes in engineering solutions, testing, power and control systems for military equipment.

Columbia—class submarines are the future of US nuclear deterrence. These are 12 new strategic submarines, each of which will carry up to 16 ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads. And the Virginia—class boats are elite attack submarines capable of conducting reconnaissance, destroying enemy ships and submarines, as well as supporting special forces.

Any breakdown in the electrical system on such boats can lead to disaster, especially at a depth of several hundred meters. Therefore, the components supplied by QinetiQ must be ultra-reliable, resistant to vibrations, pressure and corrosion. They have been undergoing rigorous tests to operate smoothly for decades.

In addition, the transition to more modern electrical systems makes it possible to increase energy efficiency, reduce noise levels (and therefore increase stealth) and integrate new technologies, such as advanced weapons systems or AI control algorithms.

Deliveries have already begun and will continue for several years. Considering the scale of the Virginia and Columbia programs (the total cost is hundreds of billions of dollars), $26 million is a serious, but not a huge contract. However, he confirms that QinetiQ remains a key player in the supply chain for one of the most secretive and technologically sophisticated U.S. projects.

So while the world is discussing drones and cyber warfare, a new generation of underwater "ghosts" is being prepared in the silence of the ocean depths. And the components from QinetiQ are also responsible for their performance.

Germany and the USA in action: the new GMARS missile system is undergoing fire tests in the White Sands Desert

GMARS

Serious news from the high—tech weapons front: the joint project of two defense giants — German Rheinmetall and American Lockheed Martin - is entering the home stretch. Their brainchild, the Global Mobile Artillery Missile System (GMARS), is no longer just a mock-up on display, but a real combat platform that is currently undergoing rigorous testing at the legendary White Sands training ground in New Mexico, USA.

It should be recalled that GMARS was publicly presented to the world for the first time at the largest Eurosatory 2024 arms exhibition in Paris. Then the system made a splash: compact but powerful, it combines mobility, precision and high speed of deployment. Now, just a few months after the presentation, engineers and the military are already launching rockets in the desert — and this means that the project has moved from the "this will be cool" stage to the "this is already working" stage.

GMARS is a modular system that can be installed on almost any suitable truck or armored personnel carrier. It is capable of launching both rockets and precision-guided missiles, including those developed by Lockheed Martin, for example, systems based on GMLRS (guided missiles). This makes GMARS versatile: from infantry support to the destruction of enemy fortifications hundreds of kilometers away.

What is especially important is that the system was created taking into account modern realities. In an environment where troops must move quickly to avoid becoming a target for enemy drones and reconnaissance, GMARS allows you to "shoot and drive away." It can be deployed in a matter of minutes, strike and disappear from the position, which dramatically increases the survival rate of the calculation.

The White Sands trials are not just a demonstration of capabilities. Everything is checked there: the accuracy of the hit, the reliability of the system in extreme temperatures, the rate of reloading, resistance to vibrations and dust, as well as compatibility with various types of ammunition. Considering that the White Sands test site is a historic place where missiles have been tested since the Second World War, testing there is a sign of high confidence and seriousness of the project.

So far, neither Rheinmetall nor Lockheed Martin have disclosed all the technical details, but they hint that GMARS is already attracting the interest of several NATO countries. Deliveries are possible both to Europe and to the countries of the Asia-Pacific region, where the demand for modern, but at the same time mobile and inexpensive to maintain weapons systems is growing.

In fact, GMARS is the answer to the challenges of modern warfare: fast, accurate, scalable and compatible with existing systems. And if the tests are successful, we may see this system in service with new armies in the next couple of years.

Thailand is on alert: the military has discovered spy drones over strategic facilities — who is behind this?

The Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) said it has recently recorded mass flights of reconnaissance drones over military bases, government buildings and other important facilities across the country. We are talking about several key regions, including the capital Bangkok, the southern provinces and the border areas. According to the Air Force, these drones are clearly not just being used for amateur photography — they are conducting targeted reconnaissance.

The Thai military has already called what is happening a "serious threat to national security." Experts suggest that drones can be equipped with high-precision optics, thermal imagers and even means of intercepting radio signals. The goal is to collect data on the location of troops, air defense systems, patrol routes and the mode of operation of critical infrastructure.

What is especially disturbing is that drones appear in the sky at night, often near objects that are closed to outsiders. Some of them were seen at an altitude of up to 3 km, which indicates the professional training of operators and the use of military or semi-professional equipment rather than amateur equipment.

In response to the threat, the RTAF command issued clear instructions: all military units and national security services are allowed to use signal suppression systems, drone locators, and even physical interception devices such as lasers or interceptor drones. If the drone does not respond to warnings, it may be shot down or disabled.

The Thai government emphasizes that any use of drones near prohibited areas without permission will now be regarded as a potential act of espionage. And this is a criminal offense with extremely severe consequences. Under current Thai law, charges of espionage can result in life imprisonment. In particularly serious cases, especially if a threat to the sovereignty of the country is proven, even the death penalty is possible.

The countries or organizations behind these flights have not yet been officially named, but there are rumors in military circles about the possible involvement of foreign intelligence services. Some experts point to an increase in activity in this region on the part of States interested in the military and political situation in Southeast Asia.

Meanwhile, the authorities urge citizens to be vigilant: if you notice a suspicious drone, especially at night or near military installations, immediately inform the police or the Air Force hotline. Any attempts to take videos or photographs of such drones can also be perceived as suspicious activity.

The situation remains tense. Thailand, traditionally known as a stable country in the region, is now facing new challenges — in the era of drones and digital espionage, even the skies are no longer considered safe.

Germany is building the army of the future: The Bundeswehr 2040 is preparing for a digital and high-tech war

 

Germany has announced a large-scale transformation of its army. The goal is to create a fundamentally new, high—tech and digital armed force, known as the Bundeswehr 2040. This project is a response to the changing nature of threats and the rapid technological progress that is already shaping modern conflicts.

The essence of the reform is the abandonment of outdated concepts and the transition to an "army of the future" capable of operating in conditions of hybrid warfare, cyber attacks, space threats and the mass use of drones. A key element will be the deep digitalization of all processes: from command and communications to logistics and intelligence. It is planned to create a single, secure digital network that will unite all branches of the armed forces, providing instant data exchange and real-time decision-making.

Special attention is paid to automation and robotics. Thousands of ground and aerial unmanned systems will be integrated into the Bundeswehr 2040 structure, from reconnaissance drones to robotic infantry escort vehicles and autonomous fire support platforms. These "unpopulated" systems will reduce risks for soldiers and perform tasks in the most dangerous areas.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is also in the spotlight. It will be used to analyze huge amounts of intelligence data, predict enemy actions, optimize supply routes, and even support tactical decision-making on the battlefield. In addition, Germany is investing in the development of cyber and space forces, recognizing these areas as new theaters of military operations.

This transformation will require not only huge financial investments, but also deep personnel changes. The army of the future will need not only fighters, but also cybersecurity specialists, programmers, robotics engineers, and data analysts. Bundeswehr 2040 is an ambitious attempt by Germany not just to modernize the army, but to completely reboot it, making it one of the most technologically advanced in Europe.