> Yellowstone END

Sunday, 4 January 2026

EPISODE 029: IN VENEZUELA, WHAT JUST HAPPENED IS CALLED ELITE BETRAYAL

Venezuela elite betrayal: covert operation and geopolitical maneuvering

Fast.

Relentless.

Precise.

Certain.

I’m not offering analysis—just impressions. Raw, unfiltered sensation. The kind that crawls up your spine before the headlines catch up.

There was knowledge.

Not rumor. Not speculation. But knowledge.

Someone inside Venezuela’s ruling structure knew. Knew the exact hour, the flight path, the target list. Knew the U.S. wasn’t bluffing—they were coming to extract.

And yet… that knowledge didn’t reach Nicolás Maduro.

Because it wasn’t meant to.


THE SIGNAL WAS SENT—BUT NOT TO HIM

The intelligence flow wasn’t broken. It was rerouted.

Special services? Military comms? Surveillance chatter? Doesn’t matter.

What matters is this: the signal went “up”… but stopped just short of the president’s desk.

It went elsewhere.

To the men who stand just behind him in photos.

The ones with the same weight, the same posture, the same silence.

I keep seeing a face—

Not tall. Stocky. Receding hairline. Eyes that have watched too many purges and survived them all.

A man with epaulettes. A man who whispers in the inner sanctum.

Diosdado Cabello. Or maybe Vladimir Padrino López.

Does it matter which one? They’ve both been waiting.

Not for democracy. Not for freedom.

For a deal.


A COUP DISGUISED AS A RAID

The operation was surgical—yet absurdly theatrical.

U.S. helicopters descending on Fuerte Tiuna like it’s 1989 Panama.

Maduro dragged out in pajamas (or so the leaks say). His wife beside him. No resistance. No shoot-out. No last stand.

Meanwhile, on the streets of Caracas:

Men on mopeds waving red flags.

“¡Defendamos a Maduro!” they shout—while standing next to unmarked SUVs with U.S. diplomatic plates idling nearby.

It’s theater.

Staged for history. For CNN. For domestic consumption in both Caracas and Washington.

But for Maduro?

This was real.

The walls didn’t close slowly—they vanished in an instant.


THE REAL PLAN: HAND OVER THE OIL, KEEP THE GUNS

Don’t be fooled by the talk of “narco-terrorism” or “democratic restoration.”

This was never about justice.

It was always about control—of oil, of geography, of the Monroe Doctrine’s last unclaimed prize.

The U.S. didn’t invade to install Maria Corina Machado.

They invaded to install access.

And the Venezuelan generals?

They’ll play along.

They’ll pledge loyalty to “constitutional order.” They’ll sign production-sharing agreements with Chevron by noon.

They’ll open the Orinoco Belt like a birthday present.

But here’s the catch:

They won’t hold Venezuela together.

The moment the U.S. thinks it’s won, the fractures will explode.

The militias. The colectivos. The Colombian guerrillas in the border zones. The Cubans who vanish into the hills. The Chinese contractors who still hold port leases. The Russians with their radar stations near Puerto Ordaz.

This isn’t a transition.

It’s detonation.


THE DOMINOES HAVE FALLEN—NOW WATCH THEM BURN

Diplomacy? Gone.

International law? A footnote.

Russia and China are screaming—but they’re already drafting evacuation lists.

The UN is “alarmed.” The OAS is “monitoring.”

And in Washington, Marco Rubio is already drafting the next sanctions list—this time for anyone who questions the “legitimacy” of the new military junta.

But the truth is this:

The U.S. has just lit a fuse that runs through Bogotá, Lima, Brasília, and maybe even Mexico City.

Because if Washington can pluck a sitting president out of his palace like a bad tooth—

Who’s next?

The illusion of sovereignty in Latin America is over.

But so is the illusion of control.

You can seize the oil—but you can’t stop the civil war that follows.

The chaos won’t stay in Venezuela. It’ll bleed north. South. Across the Caribbean. Into U.S. streets, via refugees, via blowback, via the sheer gravitational pull of blow-up empires.


FINAL THOUGHT

Maduro wasn’t overthrown by drones.

He was overthrown by silence.

The silence of men who stood beside him for 15 years…

and chose, in the end, to say nothing at all.

Oil will flow—for a while.

Then the ground will crack open.

And everyone who thought this was a victory

will realize:

They didn’t take Venezuela.

They inherited its curse.

— Yellowstone-End

yellowstone-end.blogspot.com

Monday, 29 December 2025

GEOPOLITICAL FORECAST 2026: THE YEAR OF MULTIPLE FRONTS

Global geopolitical map highlighting multiple conflict fronts in 2026
December 29, 2025

2026 enters history as a "hinge year"—a year when key conflicts in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America escalate simultaneously. The world transitions from the era of "American unipolar order" to a chaotic multipolar system, where no single power can establish stability. Instead, tactics of pressure, hybrid wars, and deterrence strategies dominate. Analysts from CFR, CNN, Newlines Institute, and other centers warn: the risk of cascading conflicts is high, especially amid U.S. internal polarization, economic exhaustion of Russia and China, and the weakening of traditional alliances, including NATO [1][2][3].


1. UKRAINE: THE FIFTH YEAR OF WAR — A TURNING POINT?

By February 2026, the Russian-Ukrainian war enters its fifth year. Despite massive losses and enormous resource expenditures, Moscow maintains its course toward a "limited victory"—capturing Donetsk Oblast and forming a land corridor to Crimea [2]. The spring offensive is seen as Russia's last attempt to achieve a military result before potential cuts in Western aid.

The U.S., under the Trump administration, actively promotes a **settlement plan** that involves territorial concessions by Ukraine in exchange for security guarantees [2][8]. However, Putin shows no readiness for compromise, and Kyiv is unwilling to surrender territory. The most likely scenario is a "frozen conflict" with reduced military support from Washington [1][3].

This accelerates European autonomy in security: the EU is increasing defense budgets and working on creating a core "European army," though without a clear operational structure yet [1][3].


2. TAIWAN: ON THE BRINK OF THE "MENU"

Taiwan remains the main point of tension in the Indo-Pacific region. Beijing continues its "eating the frog" policy—regular exercises, economic blockades, information attacks, and preparations for a possible military operation by 2027 [2][8].

The Trump administration demonstrates a contradictory stance: on one hand, a record $11 billion arms package, and on the other, a new National Security Strategy that positions the U.S. as a "hemispheric power," rejecting global responsibility [2][8]. A Trump-Xi summit in Beijing is scheduled for spring 2026, where Taiwan's fate could become a bargaining chip.

Meanwhile, Japan, the Philippines, and South Korea are actively increasing defense budgets and aligning with Washington, turning the Asia-Pacific into one of the most militarized regions in the world [1][3]. Any escalation in the Taiwan Strait threatens a global economic collapse: over 60% of the world's chips are produced on the island, and potential losses are estimated at $10 trillion[2][8].


3. MIDDLE EAST: AFTER "SUCCESS" — NEW INSTABILITY

2025 was a year of military victories for Israel: Hamas and Hezbollah leaders were eliminated, Iran's regime was weakened, and all hostages were freed [2]. However, there are no political breakthroughs: Netanyahu's government, relying on far-right forces, is unable to conclude a long-term agreement with Arab neighbors.

In 2026, Israel must hold parliamentary elections (by October). Their outcome will determine whether the country can conclude a historic agreement with Saudi Arabia as part of the expanded "Abraham Accords" or get stuck in another cycle of violence [2].

Meanwhile, a new phase of conflict is brewing in Syria and Lebanon. In Idlib and northeastern Syria, fighting resumes between Kurdish forces, the Turkish army, and remnants of ISIS. In Lebanon, Israel continues airstrikes on Hezbollah positions, risking a full-scale war [1][3].

Iran, despite military and economic exhaustion, may make a last desperate attempt to revive its nuclear program, provoking a retaliatory strike from Israel or the U.S. [2][5].


4. VENEZUELA: THE "TRUMP COROLLARY" AND THE THREAT OF REGIONAL CRISIS

Venezuela has become the main arena of the U.S.'s new doctrine in the Western Hemisphere—the so-called "Trump Corollary," an updated version of the Monroe Doctrine [2]. The U.S. has deployed the largest military group since the Cuban Missile Crisis off Venezuela's coast, including an aircraft carrier, bombers, and special forces [2][8].

The goal is to achieve Maduro's voluntary departure, offering him asylum in Russia. However, the chances are slim: Caracas is strengthening ties with Moscow and Beijing, and Russia is already considering deploying military advisors and an EW base in Caracas [1][2].

If diplomatic pressure fails, cyberattacks, economic blockades, and even limited military actions are possible. This could provoke mass migration, destabilization of Colombia and Brazil, and open space for growing Chinese and Russian influence in the region [1][3].


5. GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES: FRAGMENTATION, AI, AND NEW FORMS OF WARFARE

2026 will be a year of deep fragmentation of the world order:

  • Dedollarization accelerates: China, Russia, BRICS, and the Global South are actively switching to national currencies in trade [4].
  • Artificial Intelligence becomes central to strategic competition. China has already demonstrated the competitiveness of its models (e.g., DeepSeek R1), causing panic on Wall Street [2][8].
  • Hybrid and cyber wars take center stage: from attacks on critical infrastructure to manipulating public opinion.
  • Private Military Companies (PMCs)—especially Russian ("Africa Corps") and Chinese—play an increasing role in conflicts in Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East [5][6].

SCENARIOS: FROM LOCAL TRUCES TO GLOBAL COLLAPSE

Optimistic Scenario:

  • Partial diplomatic breakthroughs (Saudi-Israeli agreement, temporary truce in Ukraine).
  • Deterrence in the Taiwan Strait.
  • Venezuela avoids direct invasion.

Pessimistic Scenario:

  • Simultaneous escalation in three regions.
  • Military crisis in Taiwan involving the U.S. and China.
  • Collapse of the Maduro regime and civil war in Venezuela.
  • Breakdown of global trade and financial chains.

CONCLUSION: THE BIFURCATION POINT

2026 is not just another stage in the series of crises. It is a bifurcation point, after which the world can either begin to build a new form of cooperation (even if more regionalized) or plunge into chaos where "might makes right." Success or failure will depend not so much on military resources as on the strategic maturity of elites and the ability to dialogue amid growing uncertainty.

As an old diplomatic saying goes: "If you're not at the negotiating table, you're on the menu." In 2026, there will be fewer and fewer seats at that table—and more and more contenders.

Analytical review based on data from CFR, CNN, Newlines Institute, Forbes, and other sources.

Sources
  1. CFR: Conflicts to Watch in 2026
  2. CNN: From AI to Venezuela: Why 2026 is a hinge year for global power
  3. Newlines Institute: 2026 Annual Forecast
  4. GIS Reports: Global challenges in 2026 and beyond
  5. Hudson Institute: Underrated Global Risks in 2026
  6. Independent: My predictions for how global conflict could play out in 2026
  7. Chatham House: The world in 2026
  8. Forbes: The geopolitical risks that will shape global business in 2026
  9. C4 Defence: Multipolar World: European Peace 2026 Forecasts
  10. CNN: Russia-Europe Analysis


Friday, 26 December 2025

EPISODE 028: DRAGON’S LEAP – HOW CHINA’S 6TH-GEN FIGHTERS ARE REWRITING PACIFIC AIR WARFARE

Chengdu 6th-generation fighter prototype
December 26, 2025

THE UNVEILING: NOT JUST A FIGHTER, A DOCTRINE

On December 26, 2024, China didn’t just roll out a prototype.

It declared a new era of air dominance.

Two distinct 6th-generation fighter programsChengdu’s three-engine heavyweight and Shenyang’s lighter, more agile variant—emerged from the shadows of Chengdu Aerospace Corporation’s facilities. These weren’t mere testbeds. They were flying manifestos of Beijing’s intent to outrange, outsee, and outlast the U.S. Air Force in the Pacific.

The message was clear:

The F-22 and F-35 are obsolete before they retire.

The NGAD/F-47? Too late.


THE HARDWARE: THREE ENGINES, ONE MISSION – TOTAL AIR SUPERIORITY

1. Chengdu’s “Triple-Threat” Monster

  • Three WS-15E engines (derived from the J-20’s powerplant, but with 20% more thrust and supercruise at Mach 1.8+).
  • Combat radius: 4,000+ km (vs. F-35’s ~1,000 km, F-22’s ~1,600 km).
  • Weapons bays: Three massive internal compartments (vs. F-35’s two, F-22’s three smaller bays).
    • Primary payload: 6x PL-17 (China’s answer to the AIM-260, but with 1,000+ km range).
    • Secondary: Hypersonic glide munitions (rumored YJ-21 integration).
  • Sensor suite: Next-gen AESA radar (reportedly 2x the detection range of APG-81) + quantum-resistant comms.

2. Shenyang’s “Lightning” Complement

  • Twin-engine, stealth-optimized (think F-35 on steroids, but with J-35’s agility).
  • Designed for swarm integration—acting as a loyal wingman to the Chengdu behemoth or operating independently in contested airspace.
  • Electronic warfare suite rumored to disrupt AWACS and tanker links at stand-off ranges.

The Killer App: PL-17 Missiles

  • 1,000+ km range (vs. AIM-120D’s ~180 km, AIM-260’s ~400 km).
  • Networked guidance: Mid-course updates via satellite datalinks (Beidou constellation).
  • Kinetic kill vehicle option: Terminal phase hypersonic sprint to defeat maneuvering targets.

Result?

A single Chengdu sortie can hold an entire carrier strike group at risk—from outside the range of SM-6 interceptors.


THE DOCTRINE: “LOOK FIRST, SHOOT FIRST, END FIRST”

Capability U.S. Equivalent Chinese Advantage
Combat Radius F-35: ~1,000 km Chengdu: 4,000+ km (covers Guam from mainland)
Missile Range AIM-260: ~400 km PL-17: 1,000+ km (outrages AEGIS cruisers)
Sensor Fusion F-22/F-35: AESA + IRST Quantum-enhanced radar + AI-driven EW
Swarm Coordination Loyal Wingman (drone) Manned-unmanned teaming (J-35 + Chengdu)
Logistical Footprint F-35: High Shenyang as forward-deployed “arsenal plane”
Key Insight from Asia Times:
“China’s 6th-gen isn’t about matching the F-35. It’s about making the carrier obsolete. If your AWACS and tankers are dead before the F-35 takes off, the fight is already over.”

THE TIMELINE: WHY THE U.S. IS PLAYING CATCH-UP

Milestone China U.S. (NGAD/F-47)
First Prototype Dec 2024 (Chengdu) 2028–2030 (optimistic)
First Flight Late 2025 (reported) 2032+
Operational Deployment 2029–2031 2035+
Full Fleet Integration 2035 2040+ (if ever)
Military Watch Magazine’s Verdict:
“The U.S. NGAD program is a decade behind in real-world testing. By the time the F-47 enters service, China will already have two mature 6th-gen platforms—one optimized for long-range strikes, the other for swarm dominance.”

THE PACIFIC FLIP: WHEN THE CARRIER BECOMES THE TARGET

The real revolution isn’t the planes.

It’s the strategy they enable:

  1. A2/AD on Steroids
    • A single Chengdu sortie can patrol from Shanghai to Guam—forcing U.S. carriers to operate 1,500+ km further east, beyond effective strike range.
    • PL-17s turn AWACS (E-3, E-2D) and tankers (KC-46, KC-135) into priority targets—crippling U.S. power projection.
  2. The “No Sanction” Zone
    • With 4,000 km combat radius, China can enforce an air exclusion zone over Taiwan, the Philippines, and even Japan—without forward bases.
    • U.S. allies in the region? Now hostages to Beijing’s air superiority bubble.
  3. The AI Edge
    • Janes reports the Chengdu integrates onboard AI copilots for real-time swarm coordination—something the U.S. won’t field until the 2030s.
Global Times (China’s state media) gloats:
“The U.S. spent 20 years perfecting stealth. We spent 5 years obsoleting it.”

THE U.S. RESPONSE: TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE?

  • NGAD/F-47: Still in paper-and-PowerPoint phase.
  • F-35 Upgrades: Block 4 won’t close the range or missile gap.
  • Drone Swarms: Replicator Initiative is a decade behind China’s manned-unmanned teaming.
The Drive’s Assessment:
“The U.S. is stuck in a 5th-gen mindset while China is writing the 6th-gen rulebook.”

THE CONTROL STACK ANALYSIS: THIS ISN’T A FIGHTER RACE. IT’S A PARADIGM SHIFT.

China’s 6th-gen isn’t about better planes.

It’s about rewriting the rules of air warfare:

  • Range > Stealth (If you can strike from 1,000 km, radar cross-section matters less).
  • Missiles > Maneuverability (Why dogfight when you can kill the enemy’s gas stations and eyes in the sky?).
  • AI > Pilots (The best fighter isn’t the one with the best pilot—it’s the one with the best algorithm).
  • Economy of Scale > Tech Superiority (China can mass-produce these. The U.S. can’t even afford its 5th-gen fleet).

Final Verdict:

The U.S. is still thinking in terms of platforms.

China is thinking in terms of systems.

And in a systems war, the side that sees first, decides first, and kills firstwins.

The Chengdu isn’t just a fighter.

It’s the first move in checkmate.


→ The future of airpower isn’t stealth.
→ It’s range, missiles, and the will to use them first.
→ China just wrote the playbook.
→ The U.S. is still reading the preface.

Sources
  1. Military Watch Magazine – Chengdu’s Three-Engine 6th-Gen
  2. Military Watch Magazine – First Prototype Unveiled
  3. The Drive – Mysterious Heavy Fighter Airframe
  4. Airforce Technology – China’s 6th-Gen Programs
  5. Asia Times – Pacific Game Changer
  6. Global Times – Dual Programs Lead
  7. Janes – Heavy Fighter Concept

— Yellowstone-End

yellowstone-end.blogspot.com

Tuesday, 23 December 2025

EPISODE 027: THE TRUMP-CLASS BATTLESHIP — AMERICA'S NEXT IRON FIST

Trump-class battleship concept: futuristic naval dominance
December 23, 2025

Not symbolism. Not nostalgia.

This is naval shock and awe reborn.

In a move that shattered decades of post-Cold War naval doctrine, former President—and now again commander-in-chief—Donald J. Trump announced on December 22, 2025, the immediate initiation of construction for two new “Trump-class” battleships, with an audacious long-term vision: a fleet of 25.

And these aren’t your grandfather’s Iowa-class relics.

These are floating fortresses—100,000-ton leviathans designed to dominate the seas through sheer mass, firepower, and AI-woven lethality. They represent more than steel and circuitry. They signal a fundamental pivot in American maritime strategy: from carrier-centric expeditionary warfare to capital ship supremacy in the face of rising Chinese and Russian naval ambition.


WHAT IS THE TRUMP-CLASS?

Described by Navy Secretary John F. Phelan as “*just one element of the Golden Fleet that President Trump intends to build*,” the Trump-class battleship is a deliberate anachronism turned futuristic weapon.

  • Displacement: Over 100,000 tons – exceeding even the Gerald R. Ford-class carriers.
  • Armament: Dual electromagnetic railgun batteries, hypersonic missile silos capable of striking 1,500+ nautical miles inland, and layered AI-integrated point-defense systems that fuse radar, lidar, drone swarms, and cyber countermeasures into a single kill web.
  • Cost: Estimated $15–20 billion per hull—a figure that has already ignited congressional firestorms.

Unlike today’s surface combatants, optimized for stealth and flexibility, the Trump-class embraces visibility. It is meant to be seen, feared, and respected—a 21st-century dreadnought built not just to survive peer combat, but to end it in the first salvo.

“This isn’t about deterrence through ambiguity,” Phelan stated in a Pentagon briefing. “This is deterrence through overmatch.”

STRATEGIC CONTEXT: END OF THE CARRIER ERA?

For 80 years, the U.S. Navy’s identity has been tied to the aircraft carrier—a floating airbase projecting power across oceans. But with Chinese DF-21D “carrier-killer” missiles, Russian Poseidon torpedoes, and AI-enabled swarm drones, the supercarrier is increasingly vulnerable.

Enter the Trump-class.

These vessels are engineered for survivability under saturation attack: armored citadels, redundant AI combat nodes, electromagnetic pulse hardening, and modular damage-control systems that allow partial mission continuity even after catastrophic hits.

Critics deride the plan as fantasy economics:

  • Budget constraints: $500 billion+ for 25 ships—before maintenance, crews, or weapons integration.
  • Industrial incapacity: U.S. shipyards haven’t built a true battleship since 1944.
  • Tactical obsolescence: Can any single platform dominate in an era of distributed lethality?

Yet proponents argue that distributed doesn’t mean undefeatable—and that a handful of Trump-class behemoths could anchor carrier strike groups or operate independently as sovereign combat zones, capable of holding entire coastlines at risk.


INTERNATIONAL REACTIONS

The world is watching—and recalculating:

Reuters: “Trump’s battleship order marks the boldest rearmament gamble since Reagan’s 600-ship Navy—except this time, it’s built around AI and hypersonics.”
Read more
BBC News: “The U.S. appears to be reviving Mahanian sea power theory—with a Silicon Valley twist.”
Read more
The Wall Street Journal: “Phelan’s ‘Golden Fleet’ isn’t just metal—it’s a manifesto: America will dominate the seas by sheer will, wealth, and weight.”
Read more
Defense News: “At 100,000 tons and bristling with hypersonics, the Trump-class isn’t a ship—it’s a statement.”
Read more
Janes: “If even half of this fleet materializes, it will force a complete reassessment of naval balance in the Pacific and North Atlantic.”
Read more

THE BIGGER PICTURE

The Trump-class battleship isn’t just hardware—it’s ideology in motion.

It rejects the postmodern logic of networked, lean, and agile warfare in favor of monolithic dominance. It assumes that future wars will be decided not by who hacks faster, but by who survives longer and strikes harder.

In an age where every camera can be a spotter and every civilian app a vector of intelligence—as seen with Russia’s Matrix platform—perhaps the counter isn’t more data, but more armor. Not just digital resilience, but physical invincibility.

Or at least the illusion of it.


The seas are changing.
The question isn’t whether the world needs a 100,000-ton AI battleship.
It’s whether America believes it can build one—and whether its enemies believe it won’t.

Sources
  1. Reuters — Trump orders construction of two Trump-class battleships, eyes fleet of 25
  2. BBC News — US Navy to build Trump-class battleships in major fleet expansion
  3. The Wall Street Journal — Phelan unveils 'Golden Fleet' vision with Trump battleships
  4. Defense News — Trump-class: 100,000-ton behemoths with hypersonics planned
  5. Janes — U.S. battleship revival: Trump pushes for 25 new capital ships


Friday, 19 December 2025

EPISODE 026: MATRIX — RUSSIA'S REAL-TIME BATTLEFIELD OSINT PLATFORM

Digital battlefield surveillance and AI-powered OSINT platform
Russian Hackers Unveil "Matrix": A Live Surveillance Grid Over Ukraine
Friday, 19 December 2025

In a stunning convergence of cyber warfare, artificial intelligence, and open-source intelligence (OSINT), Russian-aligned hacking collectives KillNet and Beregini have deployed Matrix — the first known real-time battlefield monitoring platform built specifically for the Russian Armed Forces. Designed to track, analyze, and predict Ukrainian military activity with unnerving precision, Matrix represents a dangerous evolution in hybrid warfare.

Not a simulation. Not speculative fiction.

This is the digital frontline.


WHAT IS MATRIX?

Described by insiders as “a live map of Ukraine’s nervous system,” Matrix aggregates massive volumes of intelligence from both open and compromised sources. The platform offers Russian commanders a constantly updating tactical dashboard focused on Ukrainian air defense (PVO), drone factories, command bunkers, troop movements, rail corridors, bridges, energy substations, and telecom towers.

Unlike traditional military intelligence cycles—often burdened by latency and bureaucracy—Matrix operates in real time. Ukrainian units shifting positions at dawn? Logged by 07:00. A power substation undergoing repairs in Kharkiv? Tagged, geolocated, and cross-referenced within minutes.


AI CAPABILITIES: FROM OBSERVATION TO PREDICTION

Matrix doesn’t just watch—it anticipates. Its embedded AI engine performs three critical functions:

  • Predictive repositioning models: Forecasts where Ukrainian units are likely to regroup based on historical movement patterns, logistics bottlenecks, and terrain constraints.
  • Thermal damage overlay: Displays heat-mapped visualizations of strike effectiveness, helping planners identify under-targeted or resilient nodes.
  • Urban camera integration: Leverages compromised municipal CCTV networks—especially in occupied or border-adjacent cities—to feed live reconnaissance directly into targeting overlays.

Each asset is deep-profiled:

  • A drone factory? Matrix logs its production capacity, shift schedules, supply routes, and even employee rosters.
  • A brigade HQ? The system scrapes leaked documents, comms metadata, and patrol logs to reconstruct command hierarchies.
  • A strike target? Ballistic trajectories are auto-calculated using live weather, elevation, and electronic warfare conditions.

BUILT ON YEARS OF DIGITAL LOOTING

Matrix didn’t emerge overnight. According to forensic analyses by Bellingcat and The Record, the system draws from intelligence harvested over three years of sustained cyber operations—including high-profile breaches like the Mash media leaks, Telegram channel infiltrations, and compromised logistics databases.

Multiple frontline GRU and Wagner-linked units are already reported to be using Matrix modules operationally, with early adopters praising its “unprecedented situational clarity” and “targeting speed.”


INTERNATIONAL REACTIONS

Western intelligence and OSINT communities have responded with alarm:

Kyiv Post: “Russia’s Matrix OSINT platform exposes Ukrainian military infrastructure in ways previously thought impossible without satellite SIGINT.”
Read more
Defence Blog: “Not a command system—Matrix is a hunter. It identifies prey, maps escape routes, and recommends when to strike.”
Read more
The Record (Recorded Future): “KillNet’s Matrix blurs the line between cybercrime and warfare—turning hacked webcams into artillery spotters.”
Read more
Bellingcat: “Inside Russia’s Matrix: a hacker-built war map feeding directly into kinetic operations.”
Read more
Cybernews: “Beregini & KillNet launch AI-powered Matrix—ushering in an era of civilian infrastructure as battlefield sensor.”
Read more

THE BIGGER PICTURE

Matrix exemplifies a chilling new doctrine: civilian digital infrastructure as force multiplier. Traffic cameras, weather APIs, delivery logs, social media geotags—once trivial data points—are now weaponized through AI correlation. This isn’t just surveillance. It’s algorithmic siege warfare.

As borders dissolve in cyberspace, and every city camera becomes a potential scout for artillery, the question is no longer if such systems will spread—but who builds the counter-Matrix.


the choice is yours ⥣

Sources
  1. Kyiv Post — Russia’s Matrix OSINT platform exposes Ukrainian military infrastructure
  2. Defence Blog — Matrix: A hunter, not a command system
  3. The Record — KillNet’s Matrix blurs cybercrime and warfare
  4. Bellingcat — Inside Russia’s Matrix: A hacker-built war map
  5. Cybernews — Beregini & KillNet launch AI-powered Matrix


Tuesday, 16 December 2025

EPISODE 025: THE MYTH AND THE MACHINE – BLAZE METREVELI, MI6'S NEW CYBER CHIEF, AND THE WEAPONIZATION OF BIOGRAPHY

MI6 Vauxhall Cross building, symbolizing Blaze Metreveli's leadership

On December 15, 2025, Blaze Metreveli stepped onto a dimly lit stage in London—not in a trench coat, but in a minimalist black blazer—and declared:

“Our officers must be as fluent in code as they are in foreign languages.”

The audience, a mix of cybersecurity execs, intelligence veterans, and AI ethicists, didn’t applaud immediately. They were too busy recalibrating their mental models of espionage. Because Metreveli—now the first woman ever to lead MI6—wasn’t selling spy novels. She was announcing the obsolescence of the old playbook.

But while Western media focused on her vision of AI-augmented human judgment, Russian state channels and affiliated outlets were busy weaving a far darker narrative: that Metreveli is the granddaughter of a “Nazi butcher” and stepdaughter of an “Auschwitz executioner.” A perfect villain for the age of hybrid war.

The truth? Far less cinematic—and far more revealing.


WHO IS BLAZE METREVELI? (SPOILER: NOT A BOND VILLAIN)

In British intelligence circles, Metreveli has long been known as the architect of MI6’s Digital Directorate—the real-world equivalent of Q Branch. Before her appointment, she oversaw machine learning models that track disinformation networks, quantum-secure comms for deep-cover agents, and predictive analytics that map insurgent recruitment patterns in real time.

Her background? Not field ops. Code, data, and systems architecture. She speaks Python like Churchill spoke English—with precision, purpose, and a hint of fatalism.

“We must be as comfortable working with code as with human sources.”

This isn’t metaphor. Under her leadership, MI6 is hiring algorithmic linguists, behavioral data scientists, and cyber red-teamers—not just ex-diplomats with a taste for danger.


THE "NAZI GRANDFATHER" MYTH: WHERE IT CAME FROM (AND WHY IT STUCK)

The story begins with a 2024 NDTV report citing unnamed “German archival fragments” about a Konstantin Dobrowolski—allegedly Metreveli’s biological grandfather—a Soviet deserter who supposedly collaborated with the Abwehr during WWII and participated in punitive operations in Ukraine.

From there, Russian-language outlets like Tsargrad and RIA FAN ran with it:

“MI6’s new chief is heir to the blood of Nazi collaborators!”
“Her stepfather, David Metreveli, was a torturer at Auschwitz!”

But here’s the catch: none of this appears in credible Western historiography.

  • BBC, Financial Times, Süddeutsche Zeitung, and FAZ either ignore these claims entirely or label them “unverified family lore.”
  • No German war crimes database (including the ITS in Bad Arolsen) lists a “David Metreveli” as an Auschwitz guard—or even as a surname associated with camp personnel.
  • The name Dobrowolski appears in scattered wartime records—but never linked to Metreveli by any archival chain of custody.

In short: the “Nazi lineage” is not history—it’s narrative engineering. A ready-made archetype for the Russian info-sphere: the Western spy as moral degenerate, the enemy within, the descendant of fascists now fighting “neo-Nazis” in Ukraine. The irony is so thick it could stop a bullet.


WHY THIS NARRATIVE SERVES MOSCOW

The Russian framing isn’t accidental. It performs three functions:

  1. Moral inversion: If the UK’s top spy is heir to Nazism, then Russia’s war in Ukraine becomes a “de-Nazification” campaign—not by extremists, but by victims of historical betrayal.
  2. Distrust injection: By amplifying unverified biographical smears, Moscow muddies public perception of Western institutions, making every policy look like personal vendetta.
  3. Historical continuity: It feeds the Kremlin’s core myth—that NATO’s eastward push is just Operation Barbarossa 2.0, repackaged as “democracy promotion.”

But as Metreveli herself might say: data doesn’t lie, but stories do.


THE REAL SHIFT: FROM HUMAN SECRETS TO ALGORITHMIC WARFARE

While Moscow obsesses over bloodlines, London is rewriting the rules of statecraft.

Metreveli’s speech wasn’t just about tools—it was a doctrine:

“AI must augment, not replace, human judgment.”
“Biotech, quantum sensing, and neural interfaces are the new front lines—not just tanks and trenches.”

This signals a deeper transformation:

  • HUMINT (human intelligence) is no longer primary—it’s HYBRIDINT: human + data + synthetic environments.
  • Offensive cyber isn’t just hacking—it’s behavioral shaping at scale: influencing elections, fragmenting societies, disabling infrastructure without a single explosion.
  • The battlefield is now the attention economy—and MI6, under Metreveli, is building weapons for it.

The irony? Russia’s own GRU and SVR are racing to do the same. But instead of investing in quantum AI labs, they’re recycling wartime propaganda tropes—like blaming a woman’s leadership on her grandfather’s sins.


CONCLUSION: THE WEAPONIZATION OF THE PAST VS. THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE FUTURE

Blaze Metreveli may or may not have a complicated family history. But that’s irrelevant.

What matters is this: the future of espionage isn’t in archives—it’s in algorithms. And while one side digs through 80-year-old files to find monsters, the other is coding the systems that will define the next war.

Metreveli’s rise isn’t about blood. It’s about bandwidth.

And in that contest, nostalgia is a liability.

All previous posts from Blaze Metreveli


Sources
  1. NDTV — New MI6 chief's grandfather was infamous Nazi spy “The Butcher”
  2. Cybernews — Spies must be fluent in code, says new MI6 boss Blaze Metreveli
  3. The Times — MI6 appoints first female chief in 116 years: Blaze Metreveli
  4. The Jewish Chronicle — New MI6 chief's Nazi spy grandfather raises questions in Berlin archives
  5. Deutsche Welle — German archives reveal MI6 chief's family ties to Abwehr agent
  6. Financial Times — MI6 chief: Our spies must code like they speak foreign languages
  7. BBC News — New MI6 boss warns of AI revolution in espionage
  8. Wired — MI6's Blaze Metreveli: The future spy writes Python as fluently as Russian
  9. Reuters — MI6's tech boss Blaze Metreveli to lead agency amid cyber threats
  10. The Guardian — From Q Branch to Chief: MI6's digital warrior takes helm

Friday, 12 December 2025

EPISODE 024: THE SWARM IS LIVE

Drone swarm formation during Nemyx demonstration


At 14:03 CET on December 10, over a restricted test range near Munich, ten drones—FPV kamikazes, fixed-wing scouts, and VTOL strike platforms from three different manufacturers—executed a synchronized kill chain without a single human command during terminal phase. Two armored vehicle surrogates were struck within 1.8 seconds of each other. No radio chatter. No emergency overrides. Just software acting as a single mind.

The demonstration, observed by defense attachés from NATO and U.S. European Command, marked the world’s first interoperable hybrid drone swarm strike—powered by Nemyx, the new AI-driven swarm engine from Auterion.

“By combining real-time AI, computer vision, and Skynode S-equipped drones, we have created a solution that quickly detects, prioritizes, and neutralizes multiple threats. The military can deploy swarms that act as a unified force—whether from a backpack or a truck.”
— Auterion official statement, December 10, 2025

FROM THEORY TO BATTLEFIELD CODE

Nemyx is not a new drone. It’s a layer of collective intelligence. Built on AuterionOS, it turns any compatible unmanned platform—commercial off-the-shelf or military-grade—into a node in a distributed weapon system. All it takes is a software update.

  • The swarm shares a common situational picture via Android Team Awareness Kit (ATAK).
  • Target prioritization, route deconfliction, and strike timing are handled autonomously at machine speed.
  • GPS-denied environments? Not a problem. Onboard computer vision and Skynode’s inertial navigation keep the formation intact even under full EW suppression.

During the demo, fixed-wing drones acted as overwatch, identifying and classifying targets. FPVs raced in at treetop level, executing terminal dives on AI-assigned threat priorities—not human whims, but algorithmic logic.

This isn’t “drone warfare.” This is swarm warfare.

THE UKRAINIAN LINK—AND THE 33,000-UNIT PIPELINE

Nemyx doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It’s the logical evolution of a battlefield already saturated with Auterion’s Skynode flight controllers.

As Fontanka and Ukraina.ru reported in September, the Pentagon has contracted 33,000 Skynode units for delivery to Ukraine by end-2025—ten times the previous batch. Every single one is Nemyx-ready. A field operator can upgrade an entire drone fleet in minutes.

That means the same swarm logic tested near Munich can be deployed on the Donbas front within weeks. One Ukrainian soldier—armed with a laptop and a backpack of drones—could now orchestrate a coordinated, multi-vector strike that previously required a platoon-level command structure.

This is what “mass” looks like in 2025: not more people, but more autonomous nodes per operator.

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: BREAKING THE MONOPOLY OF SCALE

Russia and China are winning the production race—churning out cheap shells, drones, and missiles at industrial scale. NATO’s answer? Interoperability as force multiplication.

Nemyx allows allies to pool drones across national and corporate lines. No more waiting for a single defense contractor to ramp up. If Poland uses FlyEye, Estonia uses Threod, and the U.S. uses Skydio—they can all swarm together under Nemyx.

“The militaries that master open architectures, rapid production, and disciplined employment will not field drones as isolated tools. They will deploy them in clouds.”
— SOFREP

And clouds don’t negotiate. They saturate. They overwhelm.

THE CONTROL STACK SHIFTS AGAIN

  • Physical layer: Drones are no longer expendable singles—they’re cells in a larger organism.
  • Technological layer: Autonomy + open OS = resilience against supply chain fragmentation.
  • Informational layer: The kill chain is now shorter than human reaction time.
  • Consciousness layer: War is no longer about who has more pilots—but who has the clearest shared logic.

The Munich test wasn’t about tanks. It was about breaking the last illusion of human primacy in tactical combat.


Tomorrow’s war won’t be fought by pilots. It will be compiled.

Sources
  1. Militarnyi FB — Auterion tests Nemyx swarm-strike package in Germany
  2. Auterion — Official newsroom & press releases
  3. Fontanka.ru — Немyx: первый публичный показ в Германии
  4. TechCult — Обзор программного комплекса Nemyx
  5. SOFREP — Swarm-demo: how future wars will be fought
  6. Ukraina.ru — Тюмень-2025: что показал инцидент с ударными swarm-BPLA
  7. Militarnyi EN — Nemyx lets drone swarm autonomously strike tanks
  8. VK — Nemyx field clips & tech specs mirror
  9. Telegram channel «UAV Tech» — continuous Nemyx updates

— Yellowstone-End

yellowstone-end.blogspot.com

Saturday, 6 December 2025

EPISODE 023: "AMERICA FIRST, ABOVE ALL"

HOW TRUMP'S 2025 NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY REWRITES THE GLOBAL GAME

A white eagle holding a planet in its claws, symbolizing Trump's National Security Strategy for 2025


In November 2025, the White House released a new National Security Strategy—a document that doesn't just reflect the philosophy of Donald Trump's second administration but rewrites the very architecture of international relations. Unlike endless declarations of "global responsibility" and "democracy promotion," this text reads like a manifesto of sovereignty, realism, and strength.

And it's already in motion.

FROM "GLOBAL POLICEMAN" TO "ARCHITECT OF ORDER"

For three decades after the Cold War, the U.S. acted as a nation endowed with the moral right to shape reality everywhere—from the Balkans to the South China Sea. The new strategy calls this approach a "wish list of elites"—bloated, self-destructive, and detached from national interests.

Trump offers the opposite:

"Focusing on everything means focusing on nothing."

Instead of endless "forever wars," there are eight resolved conflicts in eight months: from Gaza to the DRC, from Kosovo to the Indo-Pakistani border.

Instead of empty rhetorical commitments, there are tariffs, energy sovereignty, a trillion dollars for the military, and demands for allies to pay their share: NATO is now required to spend not 2%, but 5% of GDP on defense.

This isn't isolationism. It's strategic discipline.

THE FOUR PILLARS OF THE NEW STRATEGY

1. SOVEREIGNTY AS THE HIGHEST VALUE

Borders are controlled. Immigration is based on national interest. Transnational institutions are not above the Constitution. Even the UN and WTO must be reformed or bypassed if they hinder American interests.

2. PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH, NOT CONCESSIONS

"Strength is the best deterrent," the document states. Operation Midnight Hammer to destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure is not an act of aggression but a tool to prevent war. The same goes for the Golden Dome missile defense system and the modernization of the nuclear triad.

3. INDUSTRIAL INDEPENDENCE AS NATIONAL SECURITY

Globalism is declared a destructive mistake. Reshoring supply chains, reindustrialization, and an energy boom are all part of economic patriotism, without which military power is impossible.

4. CULTURAL REVIVAL AS THE FOUNDATION OF POWER

The removal of "DEI," "woke culture," and "gender madness" from the military and government is not a culture war but a restoration of institutional combat readiness. Without a healthy nation, there is no great power.

GEOPOLITICS WITHOUT SENTIMENTALITY

The strategy clearly defines regional priorities:

  • Western Hemisphere — A zone of exclusive U.S. interests. The "Trump Corollary" to the Monroe Doctrine means zero tolerance for foreign influence, especially from China and Russia.
  • Indo-Pacific — Not a space for "containment," but for openness and free navigation, provided supply chains do not depend on hostile regimes.
  • Europe — An ally, but a weak one. The U.S. is willing to defend it, but only if it returns to "civilizational confidence" and abandons "energy suicide."
  • Middle East — No more "forever wars," but no room for Iranian or Chinese dominance. Oil must serve stability, not chaos.
  • Africa — A continent where the U.S. will compete for influence through technological and economic superiority, not humanitarian missions.
This is not diplomacy. It is systemic pacification—using the opponent's momentum against them.

THE TRUMP PARADOX: PRESIDENT OF PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH

The most striking aspect of the document is Trump's declaration as the "President of Peace." And this is not rhetoric. Unlike administrations that fueled conflicts under the banner of "democracy," Trump uses levers of power for diplomacy:

  • Threats as a means of coercion into negotiations;
  • Economic sanctions as a tool of demarcation;
  • Military power as a guarantee that the opponent will want to negotiate rather than fight.

This is geopolitical judo: using the opponent's momentum against them.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE WORLD

Trump's world is not a world of "everything is fine." It is a world of hierarchies, sovereignties, and balances. There is no place for "global government," but there is room for strong nations that negotiate based on mutual respect.

  • For Ukraine — You are not the center; you are an object of settlement.
  • For Europe — You must pay and think for yourselves.
  • For China and Russia — You will not achieve hegemony, but you will not be destroyed if you do not cross red lines.
  • For the U.S. — A rebirth as a civilizational core where security, economy, culture, and strength go hand in hand.

CONCLUSION: THE END OF THE ILLUSIONS ERA

The 2025 National Security Strategy is the antithesis of the "world order" of Biden and Obama. It rejects messianism in favor of realism, sacrifice in favor of sovereignty, and globalism in favor of the nation.

"Over the past nine months, we have brought our nation—and the entire world—back from the brink of catastrophe."

If this strategy is implemented, the 21st century will not be an era of multilateralism but an era of sovereign empires—and America intends to be the first among them. Not by right, but by strength.

Sources
  1. White House — 2025 National Security Strategy (full 33-page PDF)
  2. USNI News — Pentagon’s take on the 2025 Strategy: ships, drones & China
  3. Al Jazeera — Five big shifts in Trump’s 2025 NSS
  4. CFR — “America First” 2.0: what changed since 2022
  5. Reuters — “Golden Dome” missile-defence pledge preview, May 2025
  6. GOLDIIS — Mirror copy of NSS PDF (Sept 2025 checksum)
  7. Arms Control Center — Golden Dome fact-sheet & cost estimates
  8. Wikipedia — Golden Dome (missile defense system) overview
— Yellowstone-End, December 6, 2025

Featured Post

GEOPOLITICAL FORECAST 2026: THE YEAR OF MULTIPLE FRONTS

December 29, 2025 2026 enters history as a "hinge year"—a year when key conflicts in Europe, Asia, the Middle E...

⥥ Help the author-

- the choice is yours ⥣

The author's blog

realm

Kir Dykoff

Author

News, forecasting and analysis of the geopolitical situation in the world

Books by the author

Contact the author

CONTACT THE AUTHOR

Search This Blog

Labels

USA China NATO Ukraine Israel drones Russia Iran UFO Trump US Navy contract Intelligence France Lockheed Martin United States drone electronic warfare Germany Military Technology South Korea Turkey UAV US Air Force Pentagon Putin Defense Europe Japan Zelensky Great Britain Syria F-35 Middle East conflict Ministry of Defense Testing India North Korea BAE Systems Donald Trump AI United Kingdom Rheinmetall Tests UFOs Boeing Indo-Pacific Region Sweden UK Yellowstone nuclear weapons weapons California Ukrainian Armed Forces F-16 General Atomics NORWAY US U.S. Army tanks Australia British Army Spain hypersonic missiles Airstrikes Bundeswehr EU Sabotage South China Sea THAAD UAVs US Department of Defense Yellowstone supervolcano Arctic CANADA Kiev Satellite images UAP laser weapons military Analysis F-35B military cooperation DARPA EVACUATION started Hypersonic Weapons Incident Kursk Region Red Sea Romania Trump Administration U.S. Air Force army autonomous systems Baltic Sea Control Egypt Greece Italy KNDS Patriot Saudi Arabia weapon Airbus Black Sea Combat Operations Denmark FPV drones General Dynamics Los Angeles Pacific Ocean U.S. Navy ASELSAN Alaska Armed Forces B-21 Raider Elon Musk F-35A FPV Finland Ground Forces Hamas Hypersonic Missile Istanbul NASA Thales US Space Force Apocalyptic seismic Asia-Pacific region Assad CIA Gaza Strip Helicopters Hezbollah Mexico Philippines Sikorsky Support combat aircraft combat drones medium strategy Brazil British Ministry of Defense Chile Chinese Defense Budget Gaza Iron Dome MI6 Military Modernization Norinco anti-drone systems helicopter nuclear submarine warship "Oreshnik" AUKUS Bunker Communications French Air Force Israel Defense Forces Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Moscow Police Program Shooting Su-57 Ukraine War White House bunkers fires military strategy missile defense system nuclear nuclear power plants test Antarctica Area 51 Black Hawk Bomber Crash French army Inauguration Kursk Protests Starlink World War II X-37B mystery Advanced Technology Algeria Ankara Anti-Drone System Biden DeepSeek Earthquake East China Sea England European Union F-22 Raptor FBI Guam Hivemind Hypersonic Israeli Navy JMSDF Lebanon London MATRIX New York P-8 Poseidon Project Secret Turkish UH-60 Black Hawk USS Harry S. Truman Ukrainian conflict Vatican War in Ukraine Washington hackers mysterious drones terrorist attack tested Apocalypse Arrest Bradley British Armed Forces British Navy Bryansk region Conclave Denver Erdogan European defense F-15 General Dynamics Electric Boat IISS Macron Microsoft Moon NORAD North Sea Pacific region Partnership Portugal Quantum Systems Robots San Andreas Submarine Fleet Symbol TRIDENT Tulsi Gabbard U.S. Marine Corps UAP / UFO USAID Ukrainian Army Ukrainian Forces Ukrainian crisis United States Space Force anti-tank weapons bombs fleet military aircraft nuclear strike plane crash plans problems special operations forces unidentified objects Air Power America Armageddon Arrow 3 Autonomous Submarine B-52 bombers Bitcoin British weapons Cape Canaveral Car Civil War Collision Congress Cuba Elohim F-18 F-35I Forecast for 2025 Future GHOST Game German Armed Forces German Ministry of Defense German company Google Hungary Iranian Army Israeli Drones Israeli-Palestinian conflict Joe Biden John F. Kennedy KNDS Germany Killing Las Vegas Leclerc XLR Libya Long Valley Mysterious Nazi Germany New York City New Zealand Polish Ministry of National Defense Russian Oil Russian forces S-97 Raider South Korean Air Force Space Force Stealth Aircraft Stryker Turkish army U.S. U.S. intelligence U.S. military US Armed Forces US Navy ship US military base US military bases USSR Volodymyr Zelensky Werner von Braun World War III Yuzhmash accident aerospace forces anti-submarine aircraft assassinations attacks contacts crashed demilitarization detonate firefighters gas pipeline global conflicts modernization program modernizing nuclear aircraft carrier pilot plane special military operation suicide drone unidentified drones unmanned helicopter "chemical fog" "five eyes" 11 books 72 hours AI Tool AI singularity AI-Powered ASSN Aga Khan Air Force Bomber Fleet Air Force Viper fleet Airport in Las Vegas Al system Al-Qaeda Alibaba Alien Alien Creatures Alien Technology American aircraft carrier American corporations American intelligence agencies American military bases Analysis and Prospects Anti-Aircraft Defense Anti-Submarine Defense Feature Apache Helicopters Apocalyptic map Arache Assassination Documents Assassination Files Atak helicopter B-1B Lancer bombers B-52H Stratofortress Battlefield is Earth Baykar Technologies Bayraktar TB2T-AI Black Death Black Hawk Helicopter Blekinge-class submarine Boeing 737 Boeing 767 British Royal Mint British intelligence officers British weapons systems CETUS Cable Break Chaos in Syria Chinese Army Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Naval Forces Chinese Scientists Chinese cyberwar plan Chinese hacking Chinese military Chinese space station Chinese state Commercial Vessel Cyberlux Corporation Czech Tatra Defense Vehicle Drone Ship Dutch Air Force Eagle Earl Naval Weapons Base Earth's rotation East Asia Economic Transformation Electric Electromagnetic Wars Enigma Labs European country European leaders European nations European war Evacuations F-16C Viper F-18 Hornet FEMA FRP Fairford Air Base Financial support Fire Department Five Eyes Flying Discs Framework Documents Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOP) French company Friendly Fire Future Fast Interceptors Gabriel 5 Galaxy Gas Attack Gaza Conflict Genasys Inc. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) Generation Z George W. Bush Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carriers Gerald R. Ford class German Defense Ministry Ghost UAS Global Hawk Greek Ministry of National Defense Groom Lake Guantanamo Guaranteed destruction HELP Hamas or Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Hollywood Hostage Crisis Hypersonic Milestone Hysteria IDEX Innovations Invasion Ireland Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Israeli Defense Forces Israeli Military Israeli company Israeli forces Italian Army J. D. Vance JFK Janet KF-16 KNDS-France Kabbalah fleet Kimbаl Musk King Charles Kursk area LOWUS Leopard 2A7HU Luxury Properties Masonic symbols Meteor Military Satellite System Missile Base Moroccan Army Morocco Mystery Drones Nanotechnology Naval Strikes Nazi Collaborators Nevada Desert New World Order Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) Nuclear Detonation Nuclear Winter Obama Orange Flag Order of Assassins Orders Oumuamua Oval Office Panic Pope Francis Pratt & Whitney Military Engines Prospects for 2025 Protecting Psyonix RFK ROMAN STYLE Reagan Airport Rheinmetall Electronics GmbH Risk of Escalation Robert Dean Robert F. Kennedy Rospotrebnadzor Royal Navy's Coastal Force Royal Swedish Navy Russia's military intelligence Russian Defense Ministry Russian Ministry of Defense Russian base Russian military base Russian military campaigns Russian naval base Russian nuclear weapons Russian propaganda Secret Operations Secret Space Program September 11 terrorist attack Sergei Lavrov Shoot Down Shot Dead Sixth-Generation Soviet Stalin Star Wars Stealth Submarines Stratofortress aircraft Stryker AFV Swedish Army Switchblade Systems Symbolic Syrian conflict T-90MS TRIDENT Drill Tank Defense Systems Taurus KEPD-350 missile Terrorist Attacks The F-35 fighters The Geopolitical Standoff The Kellogg Plan Thunderforge project Top Secret Intelligence Trump's Inauguratio Tu-95 Tucker Carlson Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) Turkish aircraft U-2 U. S. Navy U.S. Administration U.S. Capitol U.S. DoD U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Marine Corps.Japan U.S. Navy and Army U.S. Space Force U.S. Technology U.S. military bases U.S. naval air base U.S.-Ukraine UFO " SPHERE " UK MoD US Air Force Base US Army' US Army's exercises US Cybersecurity US Department of Defense Funds US Marines US Navy missile cruiser USS Gettysburg US Nuclear Arsenal Protection US President US Ramstein Air Base US Secretary of Defense US Secretary of State US Special Operations Command US-Japan alliance US-UK Strategic Collaboration USAID-sponsored USS Fitzgerald destroyer USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) Ukraine as Poland in 1939 Ukraine conflict Ukrainian President Ukrainian generals Ukrainian units Under Obama Administration United Kingdom-led Expeditionary Force United States Agency for International Development United States Navy United States and Russia Universal Flight System Unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) Vance Virginia-class Voice Control of Drones Washington State Western Europe Western intelligence Western intelligence services Yellowstone Caldera Yellowstone's volcanic Zhirinovsky airport in Houston aliens aliens to visit artificial intelligence system artillery detection blue ray carrier chip cooperate democratic globalists electromagnetic attacks escalated escalations evil aliens falsification fighter drones fleet of Humanity fleet of the Ellohim future of Ukraine genocide geopolitical trap global global challenges global effect global interest heavy aerial bombs heavy tactical jets hypersonic tests hypersonic weapon system incidents intelligence cooperation intelligence services intensified security invasion of Iraq investing jihadists laser anti-drone weapon laser technology laser weapon systems (LWS) lethal weapons liberation long-range radar detection aircraft luxury bunker massive strike mystical aircraft new drones new laser technology new weapons nuclear aircraft carriers nuclear attack nuclear crisis nuclear threats nuclear weapons control objects occupation of the Earth paradigm plane crashed planet planet Mufasail platforms red lines revolutionary technology robotics industry satellite photos secret materials sixth-generation fighter jets submarine of the Royal Navy symbolism telepathy terrorist thermobaric weapons top-secret status ultimatum underground reactor unidentified aerial phenomena unidentified aircraft unidentified drone unmanned robots unmanned stealth fighter weapons and unmanned systems

News of the hour

BREAKING NEWS

Find out your Arcana

Gematria Calculator

CALCULATE

News subscription