Fatima Prophecies and Vatican Secrets: Double Forgery

 

Sister Lucia

Let's start here. 

So, in October 1958, after the death of Pope Pius XII, a papal conclave was held in the Vatican to elect a new head of the Catholic Church. The procedure for electing the pope is strictly regulated and includes voting by cardinals locked in the Sistine Chapel. Under lock and key.

The most important elements of informing the outside world about the results of the vote are the smoke from the chapel's chimney. Black smoke means that the pope has not been elected, and white smoke means that the new pontiff has been successfully elected and has accepted his election.

During the 1958 conclave, on October 26, a remarkable incident occurred that caused confusion and later gave rise to various interpretations. At one point, white smoke came out of the Sistine Chapel chimney, which was perceived by the believers and journalists gathered in St. Peter's Square as a sign of the election of a new pope. Radio Vatican even managed to broadcast a message about the election. However, after some time, ranging from a few minutes to half an hour according to different estimates, the white smoke turned black, indicating that the voting was continuing and the pope had not yet been elected. This ambiguity in the smoke signals was unusual and caused bewilderment. Usually, the change in the color of the smoke does not happen in this way.

Only two days later, on October 28, 1958, after 11 rounds of voting, confident white smoke appeared again, and the election of 76-year-old Cardinal Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, Patriarch of Venice, was announced. He took the name John XXIII. The choice of the name John XXIII by Cardinal Roncalli was significant in itself and attracted the attention of historians and theologians.

The fact is that in the history of the Catholic Church, there had already been a John XXIII. This was the antipope Baldassarre Cossa, elected during the Great Western Schism of 1378-1417 and ruling from 1410 to 1415. Baldassarre Cossa was one of three figures simultaneously claiming the Papal throne. His election was supported by an influential group of cardinals and, as it is believed, was financed by the powerful Florentine banking house of the Medici, in particular, by Cosimo de' Medici the Elder.

However, the Council of Constance in 1415 did not recognize the antipope John XXIII, and since then this papal number was considered unlucky and was not used. Before the election of Angelo Roncalli, there were no precedents for a legitimate pope to take the name and ordinal number of an antipope. By taking the name John XXIII, Roncalli effectively declared that he considered the previous bearer of this name illegitimate and cleared the number for himself. This decision was seen as a symbolic act emphasizing the legitimacy of his own election and, possibly, a desire for renewal.

The pontificate of Pope John XXIII, despite his advanced age and expectations that he would be a transitional pope, turned out to be one of the most significant of the 20th century. He went down in history as the Good Pope John, and most importantly, he convened the Second Vatican Council of 1962-1965, which initiated deep reforms in the Catholic Church aimed at its modernization and dialogue with the modern world.

Another important and discussed moment of his pontificate was his attitude towards the so-called third secret of Fatima. The Fatima apparitions of the Virgin Mary to three Portuguese shepherd children in 1917 were made public earlier, and the third secret, written down by one of the visionaries, Sister Lucia, was sent to the Vatican in a sealed envelope with the instruction that it could be opened and read no earlier than 1960. According to available information, Pope John XXIII did indeed familiarize himself with the contents of the third secret of Fatima in August 1950 or, according to other sources, in 1960. However, after personally reading the prophecy, he decided not to make it public, possibly considering its content too alarming for the believers.

The text of the third secret of Fatima remained in the Vatican archives and was published in an altered form only in 2000 by the decision of Pope John Paul II. The incident with the smoke in 1958 and the subsequent choice of the name John XXIII, as well as his decision regarding the Fatima prophecy, remain interesting pages in the history of the Vatican. Although official explanations of the smoke incident pointed to technical problems with the ignition of ballots and straw, the confusion of signals at such a crucial moment gave rise to various interpretations and is still mentioned in the context of discussing the behind-the-scenes aspects of papal elections.

And now for the explanation. We remember that in 1958, a fraud will occur in the Vatican. And after that, a catastrophe will happen in the Vatican in 1963. And Sister Lucia said that in 1960, they should open the package, and this Pope should announce its contents to the whole world. But in the Vatican, they went out of their way to commit fraud so that the Pope who was supposed to be elected would be removed at the last moment. And this is exactly the fraud. That very fraud of 1958. So, the wrong Pope took the throne in the Vatican. This is what the confusion with the smoke, with the color of the smoke from the Sistine Chapel, was connected to. And as a result, they did not choose the Pope who was supposed to reveal the Fatima prophecies, but the one who agreed to open the envelope with this Fatima prophecy but not to make it public.

The election of the pope that year happened as follows. All three candidates were asked the question: Will you announce the Fatima prophecies? Yes or no? Probably, as we assume, they first chose the Pope who intended to make the Fatima prophecies public. And they, the entire conclave, to be on the safe side, chose the pope who would remain silent. This was the first case in the history of the Vatican when such confusion with the smoke occurred, meaning they quietly reelected the Pope. And all this happened exactly as Lucia said. She told them not to commit fraud, to reveal the prophecies. Don't be afraid. Otherwise, you will commit fraud, and this will end in a catastrophe in 1963. As a result, the new Pope chose for himself the unusual name of the pope who was an antipope. Antipope is a term in the Catholic Church that refers to a person who illegally held the title of pope. This can happen during the lifetime of a legitimate pontiff or with a violation of the election procedure, which we see in this case. In general, after disputes, debates, and almost fights during this conclave, they came to the conclusion that they would choose the one who promised to look into the envelope with the prophecies. And if he deemed it necessary, he would not announce them. They chose the Pope, voted, and then he suddenly declared that he could not say whether he would announce these prophecies or not. In general, a curious incident occurred. Then they quickly replayed and put a more compliant pope who agreed to just look into this envelope and seal it back. It was precisely because of this that such a unique event occurred in the entire history of the Vatican. Moreover, it was impossible to forge the wax seal with Lucia's fingerprint. The one who sealed this envelope knew their business. And they could not open it earlier. And the new Pope, who ascended the throne through the promise to lie, or rather to definitely silence the truth, allowed the fraud to take place. From his point of view, he did not commit a sin, as prescribed, in 1960, with the observance of the protocol, he opened this envelope. And yes, if they could have opened this envelope earlier, they would have certainly opened it. But the seal was with Lucia's fingerprint. And if they had opened it and gone to her, for example, to reseal the envelope, she would have asked, why did you open it? For what purpose? After all, she had said earlier. Open the envelope in 1960 and that's it, don't come to me with this question anymore. She was asked why exactly in 1960, she said you will see for yourselves. And in 1960, the pope who opened the envelope and looked, there were two other people with him who saw these prophecies. He was asked what was there, he said it could not be announced. The whole world would stop. They asked why, he said, find a trusted person and change the text. In this form, it cannot be shown to people.

And now, when they committed fraud, Sister Lucia said, this will lead to a catastrophe in the Vatican, and this catastrophe will spill over to the entire planet. It will affect all of you. They thought for a long time about what this catastrophe could be, whether an earthquake or something else could happen, why exactly in 1963. And by the way, this pope, the antipope, he died on June 3, 1963. He did not even live to see the date of that catastrophe, which was warned about by Sister Lucia. Although he was its perpetrator. Literally, he was a couple of weeks short.

All this is in the Fatima prophecies. And they did this in 1963. And in the Soviet Union, this also affected everyone, as it was done both in the Vatican and in the USA. This catastrophe, the fruits of which we are all reaping now. Therefore, what is happening now in the USA is also happening precisely because of this. And in principle, everything that is happening in the world is a consequence of what was not done. And in principle, all this will not end well. Until they come to their senses and draw conclusions.

Please note that everything is confirmed by historical facts. All this is historically documented events. And it was precisely the accuracy of her predictions that Lucia hit the bullseye. She shocked and frightened the Catholic priests of the Vatican. Not that she frightened them, she instilled terror in them. They could not understand what they were dealing with. Does she not represent the Almighty in whom we believe, to whom we dedicate our entire lives. They were very afraid of her. Why did they not announce the Fatima prophecies until the year 2000, even this falsified text? They did not announce the Fatima prophecies because Sister Lucia was still alive. And she would have noticed the fraud. In case this happened, she would have said, what are you doing, what is this you are publishing? I did not write this. Either publish it as it is or not at all. In general, they were really very afraid of her. They did not understand what forces she represented. And they waited until the year 2000. Why? To publish this falsified document. Why? Because Sister Lucia died on February 13, 2005, at the age of 97. That is, in 2000, she was 92 years old. And she was already not in her right mind and could not assess the publication, not only of the Fatima protocols. Well, I think you all understand that people who are 95, 97 years old and show some life activity are rather an exception to the rule. Usually, by this age, a person is already practically incapacitated. They need care, they cannot take care of themselves, that is, they need care, and so on.

Therefore, naturally, at the age of 92, Sister Lucia could not delve into what was written there and, moreover, give any reaction to it. From 1960, they waited 40 years, until the moment when Sister Lucia already practically did not understand anything, and published the falsified Fatima prophecies. In general, the Catholics themselves brought up all Christian virtues in Sister Lucia. And she showed resilience of spirit. A simple village woman showed resilience of faith, and they themselves could not do anything with her. She showed them the result of such upbringing, which they themselves gave her, thus punishing themselves.

She showed how one should act with honor, conscience, religion, understanding, morality, and ethics. She gave them a lesson, they showed all the sins from the Ten Commandments. And she showed them. Look at me and learn how you should be. This is resilience of spirit. And to bribe a person who needs nothing more in this life except faith in the Almighty is simply impossible. Therefore, she lived a long life, by the way.

A very deep and edifying story.

The Fatima Prophecies and the Secrets of the Vatican: Revelations of Lucia

Vatika, goddess of the Etruscans

The Vatican sent its envoys to investigate the situation with the Fatima prophecies, but just in case, they also went there, interacted, and verified the information. The Jesuits went there, one might say, just in case, as the Catholic Church did not take this seriously at the beginning.

It was even good for the church that the people believed, for they were so dark and uneducated; let them at least be guided by some miracles. The fate of the world changed when the eldest of these shepherds, Lucia, told the holy fathers about her visions. The situation was such: children aged 11-12, and a Catholic priest, a Jesuit, listens to them with a serious face, but inside he has a smirk. Who knows what she will come up with, right? And when she said something, they understood that this was not child's play. The chances that an uneducated little girl would possess such historical knowledge, and in such detail, were zero. They realized they were dealing with something far beyond religion.

Lucia from Fatima

Lucia said she knew who was talking to her. The holy fathers asked what she meant. She replied that she was talking about them because they came from that place named after the goddess of the underworld, Vatika. The holy fathers were shocked. They asked what she knew about it, and she gave them a similar text. Perhaps the holy fathers themselves did not know the full story behind the name Vatican, where they came from. That is, like a key through her, through this girl, they opened their minds like a can of sardines.

When they realized this, they said, stop, stop, stop, wait. Before the journalists rushed in and wrote all sorts of things, they needed to isolate these children. That's why this girl was quickly placed in a parish school, then in a convent, and then took a vow of silence. They explained and brainwashed her fully that this was something she was entrusted with, that she could not talk about it, and so on. You understand, a girl from some remote village, illiterate, could be made to sign anything, especially since after these three contacts, no one else contacted her. That is, she was completely under the power of the Vatican, the priests who ruled her life until the end.

Let's move on to the text of what she told them. I actually searched the internet, and there isn't much information on this topic, but it exists; you can find articles. The Vatican is a word that immediately evokes images of the papal throne, St. Peter's Basilica, the Sistine Chapel, and centuries of accumulated treasures of art and faith. We have become so accustomed to this name as a synonym for the heart of the Catholic world that we rarely wonder about its origin. Yet the history of this sacred place dates back to pre-Christian antiquity, and it is amazing and full of unexpected twists.

To understand where the name Vatican came from, we must go back to a time when Rome was still a young city. And on the Apennine Peninsula, a mysterious civilization, the Etruscans, flourished. The Etruscan predecessors of the Romans in Central Italy had a rich culture, a developed religion, and a unique language that remains largely a mystery to scholars today. Their influence on Early Rome was enormous—from engineering achievements to religious rituals. And here we come to the key moment. The word "Vatican" has no Latin or Greek roots, and it cannot be traced in biblical texts. Instead, it is closely linked to the Etruscan world, or rather, to one of its goddesses. We are talking about the Etruscan goddess named Vatica, sometimes spelled Vatica.

Most of Etruscan culture and mythology, alas, is lost. Our knowledge of them is fragmentarily collected from archaeological finds, Roman sources mentioning Etruscan customs, and a few surviving Etruscan texts, mostly funeral inscriptions. However, it is known that on the right western bank of the Tiber, opposite the seven hills on which ancient Rome spread, there was a district that the Etruscans used as a necropolis, that is, a city of the dead. This area, known as Vatican Hill, Ager Vaticanus, or Mons Vaticanus, in those distant times lay beyond the sacred boundary of Rome, the Pomerium, and was considered unhealthy and inauspicious due to the marshy soil and proximity to the Etruscan cemetery. It was here, in this kingdom of the dead, according to Etruscan beliefs, that the goddess Vatica reigned or, at least, played an important role.

She was considered the patroness of this necropolis, the goddess of the underworld. Her name probably comes from an Etruscan word related to funeral rites or the burial place itself. Some researchers also suggest a connection between the name Vatica and the Etruscan word meaning "vine," as low-quality wine was made from the grapes grown on the slopes of Vatican Hill, popular among the common people. However, the prevailing version associates Vatica with the cult of the dead and the underworld.

The Romans, gradually assimilating the Etruscans and inheriting many of their lands and traditions, preserved the ancient name of this locality. Vatican Hill remained a place of not the highest prestige. There were gardens, villas, and a circus built first by Caligula and then completed by Nero. It was in this circus that, according to Christian tradition, many Christians, including the Apostle Peter, met their martyrdom during the reign of Nero. It is believed that he was crucified upside down and buried nearby, on the same Vatican Hill, on the site of the Etruscan and later Roman necropolis.

Over time, as Christianity went from a persecuted religion to a state one, the presumed burial place of the Apostle Peter acquired immense sacred significance. In the 4th century, Emperor Constantine the Great ordered the first basilica of St. Peter to be built on this site. This decision forever changed the status of Vatican Hill. From an outlying unhealthy place with a pagan cemetery, it began to turn into a center of Christian pilgrimage. But it is noteworthy that the ancient name, associated with the Etruscan goddess of the underworld, remained with this place. The Romans, and then the Christians, continued to call this hill and the adjacent territory the Vatican. Perhaps this happened simply by inertia, as often happens with toponyms that survive changes in culture and religion, preserving their original names. Or maybe there is a deeper irony of history here. The place dedicated to the guardian of the kingdom of the dead became a symbol of faith promising eternal life.

The Etruscan civilization disappeared, dissolving into the Roman world, their language was forgotten, their gods gave way to a new pantheon, and then to a single god. But the name of their goddess, Vatica, invisibly preserved, passed through the centuries, and became the name of one of the most significant spiritual centers of the planet. Thus, every time we hear the word "Vatican," we may inadvertently touch this ancient, almost forgotten secret, the heritage of the mysterious people of the Etruscans and their goddess, whose name echoes from the depths of time. This is a reminder of how tightly the threads of history are intertwined, how the past continues to live in the present, even if we do not realize it. Vatican Hill is not just a place on the map. It is a palimpsest on which layer upon layer of different epochs of culture and beliefs were imposed, from ancient Etruscan burials to the magnificent cathedrals of Christianity. And its name is a key to one of the earliest pages of this millennial chronicle.

That's approximately the text Lucia conveyed to the papal priests and Jesuits. It turns out that the Vatican is essentially built on the bones of our ancestors. That's why they can't calm down, that's why they keep trying to break in here. This explains a lot, an explanation of the above information, and an announcement of what will be in the next videos. So, Lucia said that in 1960, whoever was the Pope at the time, he should open the last, this third prophecy, and make this prophecy public. But she said she knew that two events, even three, would prevent this. That is, as they were supposed to announce this prophecy in the 1960s, she said in advance. The first event that would prevent this is the concordat of Vatican, that is, the Vatican, with the man with the swastika in 1933. The second event is the forgery that will occur in 1958. And the third event is the catastrophe of the Vatican, which will occur in 1963. We will reveal to you the secret of what Lucia spoke about and what everyone hides, does not want anyone to know. That's why, when they opened this letter, they closed it and put it back, decided to somehow alter what was written there because it was just brutal and spot-on.

You will learn, dear friends, what happened in 1933? Something went viral on the internet, then they said it wasn't true, then they said it might be true, so they talked about the topic. It was about Hitler's pact with Satan, or the devil. Moreover, about a pact with a signature. This topic made some noise in the info space, and then everyone seemed to forget. But the fact is that the pact was made. You can also find information on this topic on the internet and even the document itself, supposedly the pact is floating around. It's a fake. This is not the real pact. They simply hid the truth, filled the info space so that no one would think about the real pact anymore. But this pact did exist. And it was indeed concluded between Hitler and Satan, but with the mediation of the Vatican. Perhaps that would be more accurate to say. Because, supposedly, with mediation, but you are also a participant in this pact, even if you are a mediator, right? So, that's the first thing Lucia told them.

Second, she said that something extraordinary would happen in the Vatican in 1958, that it was then that the Vatican would begin to move towards darkness. And she said that the document, which they would open according to the Fatima prophecies, would already be a forgery. And in 1963, a catastrophe would befall you, the Vatican. Many were preparing for this date, assuming there might be a nuclear war or some catastrophic earthquake, but she meant something else entirely. And this was also in the Fatima prophecies.

Vanga's Prophecies and the Geopolitical Landscape: The Fall of Syria and Beyond

Wang and her predictions

The enigmatic prophecies of Baba Vanga, the renowned Bulgarian clairvoyant, have long captivated the imagination of those seeking insights into future events. Among her many predictions, one stands out with particular relevance to the current geopolitical landscape: the emergence of a new religion associated with the fall of Syria. This prophecy, coupled with the complex dynamics unfolding in the Middle East, paints a picture of a region on the brink of transformative change.

Vanga's prediction of a new religion arising from the ashes of Syria's collapse is intriguing, especially given the current political and military situation. The Syrian conflict, now in its second decade, has seen the involvement of numerous regional and international actors, each with their own agendas and interests. The new Trump administration, for instance, has been putting significant pressure on Iran not to support the Assad regime, aiming to isolate Syria and weaken its leadership. This pressure is part of a broader strategy to reshape the Middle East and counter Iranian influence in the region.

Turkey, another key player in the Syrian conflict, is also trying to take advantage of the situation for its own interests. Ankara's involvement in Syria is driven by a mix of strategic, political, and economic motivations. Turkey's actions are aimed at securing its borders, countering Kurdish influence, and expanding its regional clout. The complex interplay of these interests has created a volatile and unpredictable environment, where the fall of Syria could have far-reaching consequences.

The prophecies of the final battle, as foretold by Muslim eschatology, add another layer of intrigue to the Syrian conflict. According to these prophecies, the final battle of Armageddon will take place in Syria, specifically in the area of Dabiq or Al-Amaq, near the Turkish border. This battle is predicted to be a major victory for the Muslims over the Romans, with a third of the Muslim army emerging victorious. This prophecy has been a rallying cry for various jihadist groups, who see the Syrian conflict as a fulfillment of these ancient predictions.

The biblical prophecies also play a significant role in shaping the narrative around the Syrian conflict. The ancient city of Megiddo, associated with the biblical story of Armageddon, is seen as a symbol of the ultimate battle between good and evil. The prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Amos predict the destruction of Damascus, with the Lord of Hosts promising to light a fire on the walls of the city. These prophecies have been interpreted by some as a sign of the impending doom and the final judgment.

The geopolitical landscape is further complicated by the prophecies surrounding Donald Trump and global events. In January, Trump took office, marking the beginning of a series of interesting and tumultuous events. Protests erupted in various countries, including Moldova, Romania, Germany, the USA, and South Korea, reflecting a global wave of discontent and unrest. The war in Syria, meanwhile, has been heating up with renewed vigor, as various factions and international actors jockey for position and influence.

The convergence of these prophecies and the current geopolitical dynamics creates a complex and multifaceted picture of the Middle East. The fall of Syria, as predicted by Vanga, could indeed lead to the emergence of a new religion or ideology, reshaping the region's political and social landscape. The involvement of the Trump administration, Turkey, and other actors adds to the complexity, with each player pursuing their own interests and agendas.

In conclusion, the prophecies of Baba Vanga and the current geopolitical landscape paint a picture of a Middle East on the brink of transformative change. The fall of Syria, the involvement of the Trump administration, Turkey, and other actors, and the prophecies of the final battle and biblical predictions all contribute to a complex and multifaceted narrative. The international community must remain engaged in diplomatic efforts to address the complex challenges posed by the Syrian conflict, ensuring that the future of the region is guided by principles of peace, stability, and human rights. The resolution of this crisis will depend on the ability of all parties to navigate this challenging landscape with wisdom, restraint, and a commitment to the well-being of the people of the Middle East and the broader global community.