On Wednesday, December 3, 2025, it became known that the meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and the U.S. delegation—Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner—in Brussels had been canceled. Instead of traveling to Belgium, Witkoff and Kushner left Moscow and headed straight for Washington. Zelensky, who had been awaiting the talks, announced his return home. For Kyiv, this is not just a diplomatic disappointment—it is a strategic signal that may mark the beginning of a new phase in the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine, one in which Kyiv loses its role as a key player.
On the surface, this is a diplomatic failure.
In reality, it is a geopolitical shift.
Sources
- Lenta.ru — Witkoff and Kushner leave Moscow without visiting Kyiv
- Vz.ru — Kremlin talks: What Putin, Witkoff, and Kushner discussed
- RBC — Zelensky left without a meeting: What this means for Ukraine
- Reuters — U.S. envoys skip Kyiv, head to Washington after Moscow talks
- The Guardian — Ukraine left out as U.S. shifts focus to direct Russia talks
FROM THE KREMLIN TO THE WHITE HOUSE: A ROUTE THAT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF
The five-hour negotiations between Witkoff, Kushner, and Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin on December 2 were decisive. According to Yuri Ushakov, an aide to the Russian president, the Americans made it clear that they would not go to Kyiv and would not even stay in Europe—their priority was to report directly to Trump.
This is not just a logistical decision. It is a political choice.
For Trump’s team—pragmatists focused on "deals" rather than ideology—the dialogue with Moscow, not Kyiv, became the priority. This is no coincidence: during the five hours of discussions, the American representatives heard a tough but constructive position from Russia regarding the core of the conflict: territorial realities, the demilitarization of Ukraine, and long-term security guarantees.
Western media confirm this conclusion. Reuters and BBC News report that the Americans came to the realization: "Without direct dialogue with Moscow, peace is impossible," while CNN explicitly states that "Kyiv has lost trust as a reliable partner in negotiations." Politico quotes State Department sources: "The Americans left Moscow with the feeling that Russia is ready to move forward, but Ukraine is not."
WHY DID WASHINGTON "DISCONNECT" ZELENSKY?
The answer lies in one fact: Kyiv is not a subject of peace; it is an object of settlement.
Despite the rhetoric about "inviolability of borders" and "support for sovereignty," the Trump administration appears to have begun accepting Russian terms as the actual basis for any future agreement. This makes sense: the U.S. is tired of a protracted war that yields no strategic dividends but drains the budget and reputation.
Meanwhile, Ukraine continues to demonstrate unrealistic expectations: Zelensky still demands "everything back," including Crimea and Donbas, while simultaneously begging for military aid and money from Europe.
The Guardian notes: "Kyiv refused to discuss compromises on Donbas and Crimea, thereby dooming the chances of a diplomatic breakthrough."
Financial Times adds: "The Americans are disappointed by Zelensky’s lack of flexibility, who prefers symbolism over real steps toward a ceasefire."
Al Jazeera emphasizes: "The disagreements between Russia and the West have not disappeared, but the U.S. no longer wants to be held hostage by Kyiv’s ultimatums."
GEOPOLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE: THE END OF ILLUSIONS
The cancellation of the meeting is a reality check. The American delegation likely realized that:
- Russia will not compromise on fundamental security issues;
- Europe is economically weakened and cannot play an independent role;
- Ukraine is unable to dictate terms, given its critical losses on the front (encirclement near Dymytrov, loss of Krasnoarmeysk and Volchansk).
Under these conditions, Washington is beginning to shift responsibility: if peace is impossible due to Kyiv’s position, then Ukraine itself becomes an obstacle to stabilization.
As Russian Senator Dzhabarov aptly noted: *"There is nothing bright or joyful for Zelensky in this decision."* And this, perhaps, is the mildest way to put it.
WHAT'S NEXT?
1. Ukraine risks political isolation. If the U.S. begins negotiating directly with Russia, Kyiv’s role will be reduced to a technical one—signing what is decided for it.
2. Europe is in panic. The absence of American support could trigger a chain reaction: from reduced military aid to internal crises in donor countries.
3. Moscow strengthens its position. Putin has achieved what Russia has sought since 2014: recognition of its right to a voice in European security matters.
The Guardian summarizes: "The cancellation of the meeting is a symbol that the diplomatic era based on supporting Ukraine at any cost is ending."
Politico adds: "Trump is not interested in a 'forever war' for ideological constructs that are no longer supported by voters."
CONCLUSION: PEACE WITHOUT UKRAINE
The U.S.-Russia talks on December 2 are not just a diplomatic meeting. They represent the first step toward a new geopolitical reality, where Europe is no longer a center of power, and Ukraine is not a subject but a territory that has become a victim of others' ambitions.
The cancellation of the meeting with Zelensky is not a rejection of Ukraine. It is a rejection of illusions. And if Kyiv fails to recognize this, it faces not just military collapse but political death—as a state that missed its chance to stop the war while it was still possible.
"Diplomacy is not about seeking justice; it is about seeking a balance of power. And when that balance shifts, old players become pawns," — an anonymous source in the U.S. State Department.
.jpg)
