EPISODE 021: EUROPEAN "PEACE": WAR AS A STRATEGIC RESOURCE

While Washington, through the lens of Donald Trump's isolationist plan, offers Ukraine "security guarantees" in exchange for permanent non-aligned status, Europe is preparing a response—not diplomatic, but strategic.

According to Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Reuters, and several European media outlets, Brussels and leading EU capitals are already working on an alternative "peace" plan. But unlike the American scheme, it does not envision peace.

It envisions stretching time.

Sources

1. WSJ via RBC-Ukraine — EU leaders rushing alternative Ukraine peace plan
2. Euronews — EU states torn over US peace plan, many oppose Trump terms
3. The New York Times — European leaders back Zelenskyy, resist Trump plan as capitulation
4. Pravda.ua — Europe drafting fairer peace plan for Ukraine
5. Reuters — Kyiv officials on tough dilemma over US demands
6. Vedomosti — Europe prepares alternative conflict resolution plan
7. The Wall Street Journal — Annotated Trump peace plan and EU push-back
8. Kyiv Independent — Plan of capitulation: backlash in Ukraine
9. EUCRIM — Overview of EU reactions to Russian war against Ukraine
10. EDF — 2025 EU enlargement reports: progress & challenges in Ukraine

---

EUROPE AGAINST CAPITULATION

European leaders openly call Trump's plan a "capitulation of Ukraine." They do not believe in "guarantees" without NATO membership. They know: without full-fledged ally status, Ukraine will remain a buffer, not a partner. And buffers, as history shows, are eventually consumed.

Therefore, the EU seeks to achieve three goals:

1. Convince Kyiv to reject American terms
2. Create the appearance of a negotiation process, but without concessions to Russia
3. Turn Ukraine into a foothold for prolonged resistance while Europe builds up its own military power

As noted by Euronews, there is no unity within the EU—Germany hesitates, France strives for autonomy, Eastern European countries advocate for full support of Kyiv. But on one thing, there is agreement:

Peace now = defeat tomorrow.

---

WAR AS AN INVESTMENT

Western analysts, quoted by Vedomosti and Pravda.ua, directly point out: the European strategy is based on the fact that exhausting Russia through the Ukrainian front is the best way to delay full-scale aggression against Western Europe.

In this scenario, Ukraine is not a victim, but an instrument.

European armies are still not ready for large-scale conflict. The industrial base is weak. Ammunition reserves are limited. Military-political will is fragmented.

But if the front holds for another 2-3 years, Europe will have time to:

• Restructure the defense industry
• Launch joint artillery and drone programs
• Integrate logistics and air defense systems
• And, possibly, create its own "European Army"

For this, one thing is needed: for Ukraine not to agree to a bad peace.

---

PLAYING ON TWO FRONTS

It is indicative that the EU intends not just to reject Trump's plan, but to actively sabotage it in Washington. Through business lobbies, diplomatic channels, and media, Europeans will instill in the American establishment that the "Trump peace" undermines transatlantic unity.

And in Kyiv, on the contrary: they will strengthen the image of "treacherous" American pressure and "faithful European partnership."

As written by Kyiv Independent, resistance is already maturing in the Ukrainian establishment: "We do not sign a capitulation, even if it comes with a smile and guarantees."

---

ENDLESS WAR OR PEACELESS END?

But there is a trap here.

If Ukraine continues to fight "for Europe," and Europe does not give it either NATO or full membership, then what is it?

Not resistance.

A deferred sacrifice.

The EU plan benefits Europe—but not Ukraine.

It gives Brussels time—but deprives Kyiv of a future.

It preserves the front—but destroys the country.

It delays peace—but does not guarantee victory.

And then the question arises:

Who is really capitulating?

Are the Americans—by offering a deal?

Or the Europeans—by turning war into a perpetual resource for their own security, while someone else's sons die for the "European order"?

---

CONCLUSION: CHOOSING BETWEEN ILLUSIONS

Today, Ukraine is not choosing between peace and war.

It is choosing between two types of dependency:

• American — cold, pragmatic, but time-limited
• European — emotional, "solidary," but endless

Neither plan is about Ukraine's freedom.

Both are about the geopolitical gain of those who compose them.

The truth is bitter:

No Western "plan" puts Ukraine's sovereignty above its own security.

The only real choice is to stop being a pawn in someone else's game.

But for that, consent is not needed.

Will is.

— the choice is yours ⥣

→ Further signal decoding: thecontrolstack.blogspot.com
→ Previous archive: ARCHIVE #008 — The Mindich Node

EPISODE 020: THE SYSTEM AND YOU: HOW YOU WERE CONVINCED YOU CHOOSE FREELY

You wake up in the morning, check your phone, scroll through your feed, choose what to eat, what to wear, which news to get outraged by, which guru to trust. You feel free. But have you ever thought that all these "choices" are nothing more than branches of the same tree, planted not by you?

The system long ago stopped holding people by force. Today, it operates through consent. Through the illusion of freedom, so cozy that breaking out of it seems pointless. And everything is arranged with brilliant simplicity.

---

1. CHOICE WITHOUT CHOICE: THE MARKET AS THEATER

You stand in front of a shelf with milk. It's "organic," "lactose-free," "with omega-3," "for slenderness," "for immunity." You choose—and feel in control. But who controls this control? In 80% of cases—three global corporations. And it's not just about milk. It's about election candidates, "alternative" media, "independent" experts whose research is funded by the same foundations as government agencies.

There is a choice—but only within the corridor drawn for you. Step aside—and you're outside the system. And being outside the system today is scarier than being in prison. Because you simply stop being noticed.

---

2. RIGHTS WITHOUT OPPORTUNITIES: DEMOCRACY AS DECORATION

Yes, you have the right to a fair trial. But to use it, you need to know the laws, have money, connections, and time. And you have—credit, exhausting work, and anxiety from every phone notification.

You are formally free—but in reality, you are so deep in the survival system that you have neither the strength nor the resources to exercise this freedom.

And the system knows this. That's why it declares rights—as a reminder that "everything is fair," and if you're not doing well, it's your fault.

---

3. ENTERTAINMENT INSTEAD OF AWARENESS: YOUR MIND IS THE MAIN MARKET

You're not consuming content. You are the product. Your attention is the currency. Every like, every view, every comment—these are data points that are monetized.

You think you're relaxing by watching reels. In reality, you're giving away your most valuable assets—time and focus—in exchange for a false sense of participation in someone else's life.

And while you watch how an "unknown blogger travels to Dubai," your real life passes by. And what's the point? You don't seek meaning—it's handed to you in the form of a $199 course from a "spiritual coach."

---

4. CONTROL THROUGH CARE: YOUR SAFETY IS THEIR DATA

You agreed to "convenient notifications," "personalized content," "smart" devices that listen to you even at night. All for your "safety" and "comfort."

Now imagine: in August 2025, the Pentagon already deployed a network of sensors, IR towers, and AR glasses for border guards along the entire southern border of the U.S. These technologies aren't just for the border—they're for you. For the city. For your neighborhood. For your apartment—tomorrow.

First, it's the "fight against migrants," then the "fight against disinformation," then the "fight against threats to national stability." And under "threats," they might mean you—if you start asking inconvenient questions.

---

5. DIVISION AS THE BASIS OF CONTROL

You are alone. You're "on your own." You're independent, free, unique. And your neighbor is "not your circle," "a different generation," "a different mentality."

The system has destroyed the sense of community. Replaced it with personalization. With "your style," "your goals," "your truth."

Where there is no commonality, there is no resistance. Where there is no solidarity, there is no strength. And loneliness becomes the norm.

And then you go to a new "guru," buy new "milk of truth"—and again fill the same pocket that has been draining your energy, time, and will for years.

---

BUT THERE IS A WAY OUT — IF YOU STOP CHOOSING FROM WHAT YOU'RE GIVEN

True freedom doesn't start with choosing between brands. It starts with rejecting the game by someone else's rules.

With the question: "Who determines what I need?"

With a pause between notifications.

With a look beyond the milk shelf.

Because real choice isn't what's offered to you.

Real choice is what you create yourself.

— the choice is yours ⥣

EPISODE 019: THE 11.11.2025 ENIGMA: WHEN CATASTROPHE BECOMES SYMBOL — OR HOW FATE WHISPERS THROUGH DATES

November 11, 2025.
A Turkish military C-130 Hercules crashes in the mountains of Georgia.
20 lives — extinguished.
No distress signal.
No alarm.
Just a silent fall into the abyss...

---

On the same day, in Washington, the new U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, meets with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and reminds him:
"Stop buying Russian gas. This is the path to peace in Ukraine."
But Turkey doesn't listen.
It continues to pump gas through the "TurkStream" and "Blue Stream".
It imports 300,000 barrels of oil per day.
And it is building a gas hub that could become a bypass route for all Russian energy exports to Europe.

---

11.11.2025 — JUST A DATE... OR A CODE?

Let's set aside the "official version" of bad weather or technical failure for a moment.
Let's look at the numbers.
November 11 is 11.11.
Two elevens in a row.
If you read it as 11/11, you get 1111.
In binary, this is 15, but in esotericism, it is a sign of awakening, opening of gates, reality shift.

Now, flip it:
11.11 → 119 or 911.
Hear the echo?
911 is not just the date of the 2001 attacks.
It is a global symbol of a system failure.
Loss of trust. Lies. Manipulation. The beginning of a new era of wars.

And here we are again — November 11, another military plane crash, again in Eurasia, at the border of three countries involved in a complex geopolitical game.

Turkey — a NATO ally... and simultaneously a key partner of Russia in energy.
Georgia — a "victim of occupation" in the eyes of the West, but still a battleground of interests.
Azerbaijan — a victor in Karabakh, a friend of Israel, a supplier of gas to Europe, and an ally of Turkey in every step.

Against this backdrop, a U.S. C-130J-30 suddenly appears over Tbilisi, accompanied by an unidentified drone and helicopter.
40 minutes in the air.
No explanations.
Coincidence?
Or observation of the aftermath?

---

TURKISH GAS — THE BLOOD OF THE NEW EMPIRE

While the dying soldiers fell from the sky, in the basements of Ankara and Moscow, negotiations were underway about the gas hub that would turn Turkey into a European gas broker.

As stated by a CSIS expert:
"The gas may physically come from Russia, but legally it will be bought at the Turkish hub. And then its origin will not matter to anyone."

This is not just trade.
This is a victory over sanctions.
This is a bypass of the Western blockade.
And this is the outcry of fury from Washington, which pours out in Rubio's words:
"Stop! This helps Russia wage war!"
But Turkey knows:
Gas is not just money, it is power.
And while the West demands "moral sacrifices," Turkey is building a new energy sovereignty.

---

CONCLUSION: TOO MANY COINCIDENCES

11.11.2025 — a date with esoteric resonance.
A C-130, a symbol of U.S. military power, crashes in Eurasia — in a place where the interests of Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Georgia intersect.
The U.S. immediately increases pressure on Turkey over energy.
An American plane appears in the sky over the crash site — why?
Official media hurry to bury the topic, but the facts don't add up.

All this is too smooth to be coincidental.
Or, perhaps, it is a warning?
From whom — it is unclear.
But the date speaks for itself.
2025 (2+2+5=9) 11.11.
91111.
911.
Choose the code — and you will understand who is really controlling the scenario.

P.S. Don't look for the truth in news reports. Look for it in numbers, in the pauses between the lines, in what is not said aloud. And especially — in what happens on the same day on different continents. Where the official story falls silent, the real one begins.
Watch the sky. And the dates.
They always say more than they seem.

Sources

1. BBC News — Turkish military plane crashes near Georgia-Azerbaijan border, killing all onboard
2. Reuters — Turkish military transport aircraft crashes, fatalities reported
3. CNN — Turkish C-130 crash: What we know about the deadly incident near Georgia
4. Al Jazeera English — Turkish military plane crashes near Georgian border, killing dozens
5. The Guardian — Turkish military plane crashes near Georgia-Azerbaijan border, investigation underway
6. Deutsche Welle — Military plane crash near Georgia raises regional tensions
7. Lenta.ru — Турецкий военный самолёт разбился на границе Грузии и Азербайджана
8. Mash.ru — материалы и комментарии по крушению в районе Тбилиси
9. BBC Russian — обзор происшествия и его деталей
10. РБК — информация о солдатах и деталях катастрофы

EPISODE 018: RUSSIA PREPARES FOR NUCLEAR TESTS AS STRATEGIC BALANCE TEETERS

RUSSIA PREPARES FOR NUCLEAR TESTS — THE END OF THE SILENT DETERRENCE

On November 5, 2025, President Vladimir Putin issued a directive that sent tremors through global security circles: Russian defense and intelligence agencies are to prepare proposals for the possible resumption of nuclear weapons testing.

---

🔍 INTELLIGENCE CONFIRMS: THE U.S. IS PREPARING

According to Foreign Intelligence Service Director Sergei Naryshkin, the United States has “avoided any substantive response” to Russia’s diplomatic query. Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov went further, stating unequivocally: “The U.S. is actively preparing to conduct nuclear tests.”

Defense Minister Andrey Belousov recommended immediate readiness for full-scale Russian nuclear testing. He also revealed a parallel escalation: the U.S. plans to deploy rapid-strike missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. “From Germany to central Russia—6 to 7 minutes,” he warned. That timeframe renders early-warning systems virtually obsolete.

---

📜 THE TREATY IS NOT A STRAITJACKET

President Putin emphasized that Russia has no intention of unilaterally withdrawing from the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). But he added a critical caveat: “If other signatories decide to conduct nuclear tests, Russia will be forced to take corresponding measures.”

This is not a threat. It is a doctrine of mirror deterrence—a return to Cold War logic where action begets reaction, and restraint lasts only as long as it is mutual.

---

⏳ WHY NOW? THE COLLAPSE OF STRATEGIC TRUST

The CTBT has been de facto frozen for decades, but never formally abandoned by nuclear powers. Now, that fragile norm is cracking. With the INF Treaty gone, New START in limbo, and hypersonic arms races accelerating, the taboo against nuclear testing is weakening.

Moscow’s move is both defensive and declarative: Russia will not be caught off guard. Preparations at the Novaya Zemlya test site could begin within months—infrastructure, diagnostics, safety protocols. Not for immediate detonation, but for readiness. And in nuclear strategy, readiness is the message.

---

🌍 THE GLOBAL STAKES

If the U.S. resumes testing—even underground—it will shatter the last pillar of the post-Cold War arms control regime. China, India, Pakistan, and others may follow. The world would enter a new era: not of MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction), but of MAD 2.0—Multipolar, Automated, and Decentralized.

As the Pentagon turns the Mexican border into a live lab for AI-driven surveillance and Trump flirts with nuclear brinkmanship, Moscow is sending a clear signal: Do not mistake restraint for weakness.

The era of silent deterrence is ending. The age of visible preparation has begun.

---

📚 SOURCES

• Kremlin official transcript — Security Council meeting, November 5, 2025
• Russian Ministry of Defense briefings
• CTBTO Preparatory Commission data
• Statements by Sergei Naryshkin, Valery Gerasimov, Andrey Belousov

EPISODE 017: "KHABAROVSK" AND "POSEIDON": THE PACIFIC SHADOW WITH NO DEFENSE

Russia is not just building submarines—it is creating the architecture of an invulnerable strike. And NATO knows it.

---

🌊 The War of the Future Is Already in the Ocean

While Western media debates whether "Poseidon" is real, the Russian Navy quietly—without fanfare or loud announcements—is deploying a new strategic reality.

The Northern Fleet already has the Belgorod, the first carrier of the "Poseidon," retrofitted from the unfinished Antei. Soon, the Pacific Fleet will commission the "Khabarovsk"—the first submarine designed from scratch for this "superweapon".

This is not just an upgrade. It is a qualitative leap—in size, automation, stealth, and operational concept.

---

🎯 Why "Poseidon" Is Not "Acorn"

It’s crucial to understand: "Poseidon" is a weapon aimed at the United States.

Unlike the hypersonic missile "Acorn" (likely the Zircon or Dagger in a new guise), whose range limits its use to Europe and Asia, "Poseidon" is designed for a global strike against the continental United States.

Its mission is to bypass all missile defense systems, penetrate coastal waters, and deliver a nuclear strike via an underwater tsunami, destroying not only military infrastructure but also critical life-support nodes on the East and West Coasts.

This is not deterrence. This is a guaranteed second-strike capability, even if all land- and air-based nuclear forces are destroyed.

This is why Washington is so nervous. NATO has no means of detection or interception for such a weapon. "Poseidon" operates at depths of up to 1 km, almost silently, at speeds of up to 100 knots. Sonars can’t see it; torpedoes can’t reach it. It is the phantom of underwater warfare.

---

⚡ "Khabarovsk": Small but Deadly

What makes the Khabarovsk particularly dangerous?

• It is smaller than the Yasen-class—making it easier to hide and harder to detect.
• It is equipped with a new type of reactor, ensuring unprecedented stealth.
• It is highly automated.

This is not just a submarine with a crew. It is a platform for managing underwater drones. "Poseidon" is only the first of them. In the future, such submarines will be able to deploy entire swarms of autonomous vehicles: reconnaissance, sabotage, and strike drones. This is robot warfare, where humans remain only as high-level operators.

---

🌍 Two Fleets—Four Cruisers

According to published data, Russia plans to build at least four such underwater cruisers: two for the Northern Fleet and two for the Pacific Fleet.

This creates a symmetrical threat from both oceans—the Atlantic and the Pacific. The United States can no longer feel safe behind its oceans. The threat is now bilateral, deep-sea, and inevitable.

---

🎯 Conclusion: The Strategy of the Impossible Response

"Poseidon" and its carriers are not an attempt to "catch up and surpass." They represent a strategy of the impossible response.

The U.S. can expand its missile defense, build new radars, and launch satellites—but all of this is useless against an object that moves beneath all of this, at depth, in complete silence.

At a time when Trump has already announced the resumption of nuclear testing and the Pentagon is turning the Mexican border into a testing ground for military AI, the Khabarovsk and Belgorod remind the world of a simple truth:

True strength lies not in being seen, but in remaining invisible until the very last moment.

The world is changing faster than you can blink.

🔗 Sources

Expand full source list

1. Lenta.ru — U.S. Calls "Poseidon" and "Burevestnik" Russian "Superweapons"
2. TASS — Washington Post on "Poseidon" and "Burevestnik" as Game-Changers
3. Meduza — Expert Interview: Why Putin Threatens the U.S. with "Burevestnik" and "Poseidon"
4. TVC — Tactical Advantages of "Poseidon" and "Burevestnik"
5. RIAMO — Washington Post Calls Russian "Poseidon" and "Burevestnik" "Superweapons"
6. YouTube — Video Review of "Poseidon" and "Burevestnik" Characteristics
7. Mail.ru News — Statement on the Uselessness of U.S. Missile Defense Against New Systems
8. RIA Novosti — "Burevestnik" and "Poseidon" vs. "Iron Dome"
9. Business Gazeta — Detailed Review of "Burevestnik," "Poseidon," and "Sarmat"
10. BBC Russian — Analysis of the "Poseidon" Project and Putin's Motives