So. Suppose you have "gained" money "on tour in Spain. And the message of the undermining of the volcano (it will look like an eruption of Yellowstone volcano Message) has come to you at the time of finding somewhere.
The moment has arrived H. News (link still works - not for long).
- Both on. Wow. And should be read as also recently happened ... Well, here's the way it seems not very scary ... or scary? Broadcasts here recently because of some crazy ... What to do?
- RUN TO THE MACHINE. Not necessarily to their own, but to the car. The best all-wheel drive. With family, of course. And to drive at full speed to the Russian border (even if you have already lost their citizenship). Ignoring the penal consequences, but not throwing people into a ditch.
- Where's the hurry? Ash seems will reach only two weeks? And then, depending on the wind rose, and if the behavior ... Oh, what's that? What's that going? Mother dear ...
- This tsunami bratello. About them no alert. Just do not have time. They rigidly connected with the probability of a volcano scenario and will be used after an interval of minutes. Therefore, we must hurry. Do not drive to the hotel for things. I do not "completed yet the case, and tomorrow, perhaps, I'll go." And immediately the machine. Road far. And in the first couple of hours on it will not be traffic jams.
- So, the wave will happen? Immediately after the explosion of the volcano? Kind of weird…
- Not necessary. However, with high probability, yes, once. If the author made a mistake, you lose a thing (and it will return, if something super price). If right - save lives. Given that the proposed ILLUSTRATION one point the author is already Rights (undermining the volcano), and recommend that the second part be taken seriously. If all of this unfounded fear, you just wasted read my text.
- So then maybe you need to go to the mountains, the author? Away from the coast, into the wilderness. And there is a house to rent in advance ...
- Strictly speaking, yes. The first step - to get away from the tsunami zone. You will have about a half hour before the panic. Plus or minus, as they say. Then the wave goes along the coast. It is still an hour to four. Everywhere different heights, and everywhere at different speeds (large). Where are you, where to go - you know better. Up the hill to get real. But then the chance to get out of the mountains will be gone. Generally no. In the scenario, the hard (and it was he) today Libya seem a model of order and statehood. If the waves really comes (and it will come), then at the threshold of the rented house will accumulate a lot of wanting to share with you the living space. And a couple of weeks can be a problem. To stun, fuck, kill, dismember and eat. Maybe in a different sequence. It was almost normal for Western Europe.
- Why would a tsunami in the Atlantic, it is far from the Yellow Stone?
- Bundle I examined in detail in several previous articles, I will not repeat. Technical details to Academician Sakharov.
- A military action can begin at the same time?
- Easily. And then you do not lucky.
- But you yourself wrote that the war nobody wants. And it especially does not start.
- It's like that. And the exit from the crisis scenarios are now only two. Military - "reboot the world economy" - or rather, its remnants. There is likely sluggish controlled "fire" a constant threat "to flash" big risks. Standing backstage bargaining and provocation. And "force majeure", supposedly natural. With a more comfortable reboot much greater part of the economy in a new format, a new reality. Since the actual losses are smaller piece of the pie to sharing more, and the probability of turning on the script above. The main contender for the force majeure is LCD. The actual action of the elites say that this scenario is in development for nearly twenty years (at least, an alternative explanation, I do not see). Unfortunately, this scenario does not guarantee us against accidental start a big war. The risks it started almost the same as in the first event-branch. Too great a temptation "on the sly" to solve the problem of second-level ...
In previous articles I wrote about some of the strangeness of the US economy. I did not get to put them into the framework of common sense ... It probably was born the hypothesis that suddenly explained all at once ... Well, or I think so, because everyone is going crazy as he wants, right?
Here, for example.
In the US, 16 large solar power plants. The figures "evaluators" range, I do not like to trust the American "professionals", many lying on statistics, but some things can not be hidden. Solar power, to put it mildly, not very profitable. All. (As, indeed, the entire solar energy). The only (not too intelligible) exception to date - station in Morocco (Sahara), that our today's review do not apply.
They were generally built What the hell did ???
And that's just not necessary to rub me all about the green crap, gave rise to the alleged subsidies. Right there, in the same state, the same chemical ecology put an enema with fracture - so much so that people all drinking water disappears. And no it is not particularly annoying, except for consumers. Because that money, huh? It's like selling government ... Well, sympathetic public interest. It is the government built a lot of LOSS-MAKING wind turbines, also located very peculiar ... In this aspect of his money for some reason no longer interested. Of course, the strangeness of its decisions it brilliantly explains environmental regulations. Place the selection of stations ... Well, not the most windy part of the US ... But there are no power lines should be built. So let's all do that! Not the road to pull the plants, and the plants along the roads to put? But, okay. This - is the last aspect. Let's see the current.
At very questionable profitability of the project (say, plan-negative) decision to build just 16 very large solar power plants. (And all started at the same time). Run in the technology? Improve?
Build a Well, a little, and driven around. Well, two, in different projects. Too small - it is unprofitable. And forward vayay engineering improvements. SIXTEEN BUT !!! According to several billion dollars each. WHAT FOR???
The lack of electricity in the country? Why then NEW close the plant? Maybe "green" pressed through something fantastically effective for the protection of nature? No, it's exactly the same as with the wind. If you consider all the costs of construction (and disposal) are not in dollars but in barrels, it is not profitable ...
Maybe still hope to extend projects at the margin? Well, to hell with them, with risk, with huge attachments, and other nonsense, of which the capital is not usually forgets overworked guys went on the off chance ... Suddenly, just business? A? Where are they, by the way, these power stations? That wind - these were almost all in California ... But not in North Dakota, where they like it was supposed to be geographically ...
And solar?
You'd be surprised, but ALSO IN CALIFORNIA.
But maybe this is normal? There's the wind and the sun ... And Industry ... Actually, it is all so ...
No, not normally. Most sunny US state of Florida is considered. And is Florida. And the clean energy it needs no less than on the West Coast. Here are the appropriate states (the so-called sun belt): Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, California, Nevada and Virginia. They also 16. And how divided our 16 experimental stations in the country? Probably casual "market" way? For example, one suitable for each state? https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%8D%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%A1%D0%A8%D0%90
No. ALL they are concentrated in one area. AWAY from the volcano and a tsunami zone. All 16.
Maybe it was some staff hit the experiments, well, they're there type individual, and "slipped" on the green warpath with common sense? The legislation, but locally crazy, eh? Well, in the blue as they are deviations?
No. The stations are concentrated in one area, but in the territory of three states. California, Arizona and Nevada. That is, the decision was made above. State governments have simply taken "under the visor."
- Stop. And why do we need after a volcanic windmills, but the solar energy? Sun will not be the same? Ash is the author, do not you know that there will be ash falls ???
- I know. Will be. Look carefully where he is expected to seriously. And where it will be possible to whisk whisk. Windmills and solar power are highly resistant to earthquakes. There is no uranium, which can make a problem and triple problem ... There's no coal, which is necessary to bring up from the fields (see photo on any roads after the seismic shifts). There are no dams, which will be destroyed ...
Again.
Once in the US decision on which begin to construct a set of wind and solar power plants - each one of loss-making and the dollar, and oil (green) equivalent. For break-tech enough to a thousandth of a buck. But the government allocates money. (- Not all summed up, it does not matter, the order number surpasses 50 billion With the average cost of each to 2.5 billion dollars.). That's a lot.
And location of all of these stations fit into the concept of undermining the volcano. Here it is there at this point, and they had to build. And in terms of economic returns, common sense, at least minimize losses - a little elsewhere.
Yes, now they are not profitable. But investments are today, when just print dollars. A return will go later in megawatts.
That is why, (not just so much more arguments), the author believes that there is no threat CALIFORNIA seriously. This state is preparing to Surviving the Cataclysm (although it will not be easy). Therefore, constantly held teaching and are horror stories about San Andreas - (yes, there is bad, but not the horror, the horror).