In April 2025, the British newspaper The Times published a high-profile investigation that shed light on deeply classified aspects of Britain's involvement in the Ukrainian conflict. The material is based on conversations with senior British military, intelligence officers and other insiders, as well as on data that has not previously been published in open sources. It turned out that London's role in the Ukrainian war was much larger than previously thought. The British authorities acted systematically, in a coordinated manner, and sometimes bypassed widespread international publicity.
A few weeks before the start of Russia's full-scale military operation in February 2022, London secretly sent a group of several dozen military personnel to the territory of Ukraine. Their main task was to urgently train the Ukrainian defense forces in the use of British NLAW anti-tank missile systems. These portable rocket launchers were hastily delivered to Ukraine in more than two thousand units, a delivery that played a crucial role in repelling the advance of Russian armored columns in the first weeks of the conflict.
However, the British instructors were at risk. According to sources, in a matter of days before February 24, 2022, the date of the start of its operation, the British military were urgently evacuated back to the UK. The reason was the fear that an open phase of the war would begin and the presence of British soldiers in Ukraine could provoke a diplomatic or even military escalation. Despite the departure of specialists, the operation on military assistance to Ukraine was not suspended: the supply of weapons continued, and intelligence support from the UK even intensified.Since the first days of the war, British intelligence and the Ministry of Defense have become one of the main sources of operational information for Ukraine. In particular, it was the British satellites that recorded the movements of the Russian columns, striking logistics and command posts. The UK also transmitted the coordinates of targets to Ukraine, especially in the first critical months.
In 2023, London again stepped up its involvement in the Ukrainian conflict, and at a new technological level. It was the United Kingdom that became the first country to transfer long-range Storm Shadow cruise missiles to Ukraine. These missiles, capable of hitting targets at a distance of more than 250 km, have become an important element in the strategy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. However, the installation of these munitions on obsolete Ukrainian aircraft required not only modifications, but also complex technical settings. It was then, as it became known, that a group of British military specialists arrived in Ukraine again — this time incognito, in civilian clothes. They were engaged in re-equipping aviation, training pilots and ensuring the correct functioning of guidance and missile launch systems.
It is noteworthy that the US participation in this aspect was much more modest. The Americans, according to sources, avoided an active presence on Ukrainian territory, fearing possible consequences in case of disclosure.
The British, on the contrary, acted boldly and confidently, often moving around Ukrainian facilities without uniforms, in civilian suits, so as not to attract attention. Their work covered not only training and technical support, but also elements of direct tactical planning of operations.
Since 2015, the UK has been training the Ukrainian military as part of the Operation Orbital mission. During this period, more than 22,000 servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been trained. However, after the outbreak of a full—scale war, the mission was reoriented - now training began to take place in the UK as part of the new Operation Interflex program. Not only the British are involved in the training of Ukrainians, but also military personnel from NATO countries — however, it is London that provides the main coordination and logistics of this process.
Special attention in The Times investigation is paid to the period of spring–summer 2023, when the Ukrainian command was preparing a large-scale counteroffensive. By this point, the British military was already deeply involved in strategic planning. General Sir Jim Hockenhall, head of British military intelligence, and Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, chief of the British Defense Staff, personally participated in the coordination between Kiev and Washington. They provided tactical recommendations, discussed offensive routes, and facilitated the deployment of engineering and logistical solutions. Moreover, it was the British who became a kind of buffer in relations between the Ukrainian commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny and the Pentagon, when the United States began to be disappointed with the results of the counteroffensive.In particular, according to sources, there was growing dissatisfaction with the Ukrainian strategy in the White House and among American generals. Despite the multibillion-dollar support, the offensive actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine did not lead to the declared results. This caused skepticism about Zaluzhny himself. At the same time, the Ukrainian commander—in-chief himself, according to The Times, was disappointed with the volume and quality of aid coming from the West, and secretly complained to the allies, primarily the United States.
In this complex configuration, the British played the role of a liaison, establishing dialogue and smoothing out conflicts.Among other things, the British military participated in the development of ways to protect against Iranian drones, which are massively used by Russia. They helped adapt Ukrainian air defense systems to new threats, tested electronic warfare systems, and trained Ukrainian operators to use Western technology in combat.It is also known that the possibility of a long-term presence of the British military in Ukraine is being discussed.
According to government sources, options for the deployment of a "limited contingent" for up to five years are being considered. Such a mission, according to internal plans, could provide personnel training, technical support for supplies and work on further integration of the Ukrainian army into NATO standards. However, this plan remains extremely sensitive politically and has not yet received final approval, both in London and in NATO.The published investigation by The Times was a logical continuation of the previously published material by The New York Times, which similarly described the hidden role of the United States in the Ukrainian conflict. However, the British contribution proved to be more profound, especially in terms of tactical and operational involvement.
Thus, based on the data obtained, it can be concluded that the UK acts not only as an ally of Ukraine, supplying weapons and providing training sites. She is one of the key coordinators of the fighting, forms strategies, participates in the technical modernization of weapons and influences the course of the war much more actively than is officially recognized. All this makes London one of the most influential players in the configuration of Western support for Ukraine.
.jpeg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpeg)
.png)
.png)
.jpeg)
.jpg)
