Correlation of solar activity and US military interventions in the Middle East

The scientific basis of the relationship

Studies confirm the influence of the 11-year cycle of solar activity on atmospheric processes. During periods of solar maxima, there are:

- Changes in atmospheric circulation: Correlation patterns of tropospheric circulation are increasing over the North Atlantic.

- Modification of jet streams: This affects the distribution of temperatures and precipitation, creating conditions for climatic anomalies in the Middle East region.

- Stratospheric mechanisms: Additional heating of the stratosphere changes the polar vortex, which has a downward effect on tropospheric processes.

Historical coincidences of interventions with solar maxima

Over the past four decades, key U.S. military interventions in the Middle East have surprisingly coincided with the peaks of the 11-year solar cycle. So, in 2003, when the invasion of Iraq began, the peak of the 23rd solar cycle was observed, which occurred in 2001-2002. This operation, known as Freedom for Iraq, has become one of the largest US military campaigns in the region.

In 2011, during the peak of the 24th solar cycle (around 2014-2015), the United States and its allies intervened in Libya, known as Operation Dawn Odyssey. The war in Syria, which began in 2014, also fell into the ascending phase of the same 24th cycle, when the United States began to strike at the ISIS terrorist organization as part of Operation Unwavering Resolve.

Finally, in 2025, at the peak of the 25th solar cycle, which falls on 2024-2025, the United States launched large-scale strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. This event continues the trend of large-scale military operations coinciding with periods of high solar activity.

The start of Operation Unwavering Resolve in Syria coincided with the rising phase of the solar maximum.

Analysis of current events (2025)

Attack on Iranian nuclear facilities on June 21-22, 2025:

- Produced at the peak of the 25th solar cycle (2024-2025)

- Coincided with abnormal changes in atmospheric circulation over the North Atlantic

- Caused a cascade of geopolitical consequences:

- An increase in oil prices by 14.7%

- The migration crisis in Europe (3.2 million refugees in 2024)

- A split in NATO on deterrence strategy

The theoretical basis of correlation

Although a direct causal relationship has not been proven, the observed synchronicity can be explained through:

1. Climate stress: Solar maxima exacerbate droughts in the region, destabilizing socio-economic systems.

2. Geopolitical calculation: Countries initiating interventions can use forecasts of solar activity to plan operations during periods of atmospheric anomalies.

3. Energy factor: Changes in atmospheric circulation affect aviation logistics and precision of high-tech weapons.

The statistical correlation of U.S. military operations with peaks in solar activity has been traced for four decades. The coincidence of the strikes on Iran in June 2025 with the maximum of the 25th solar cycle continues this trend, highlighting the complex interaction of space, climate and geopolitical factors.

The US Secretary of Defense introduces new restrictions on the press at the Pentagon

 

Pete Hegseth

The US Secretary of Defense, who has faced leaks to the media during his short tenure, imposed a number of press restrictions on Friday evening, including a ban on journalists visiting large areas of the Pentagon unaccompanied by the government. — areas where the press had access in previous administrations, as it covered the activities of the most powerful armed forces in the world.

The new restricted areas include his office and the offices of his top aides, as well as all the various rooms in the giant building that houses the press offices of the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Space Forces.

The media will also be banned from the offices of the Pentagon's top military leadership, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Kane, without Hegseth's approval and the escort of his assistants. The staff of the Joint Chiefs of Staff traditionally maintains good relations with the press.

The United States has unveiled a massive defense investment initiative

 

The United States has unveiled a new large-scale defense investment initiative that provides for an additional $150 billion invested in priority military programs through fiscal year 2029, separate from the regular U.S. defense budget.

The plan, announced on April 27, 2025, reflects the Trump administration's strategic commitment to accelerate next-generation military capabilities in response to increasing global security challenges. The highlight of this initiative is the allocation of $500 million to accelerate the development of the F/A-XX aircraft, the sixth-generation stealth fighter that is central to the U.S. Navy's vision for future air supremacy.

American Marines arrive in Panama to provide security

U.S. Marines from Marine Fighter Strike Squadron (VMFA) 312, part of Marine Aviation Group 31 under the 2nd Marine Aviation Wing, have arrived in Panama to support the expanded security efforts. The deployment has been publicly confirmed by official images released by the U.S. Department of Defense. The move is in line with the Trump administration's strategic focus on restoring U.S. influence over the Panama Canal, a critical shipping route for global trade.

The Marines from VMFA-312 specialize in combat operations using F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fighter jets. Their arrival in Panama is part of a broader U.S. strategy to strengthen security and stability in the region. The deployment includes conducting joint exercises with the Panamanian armed forces, as well as ensuring maritime security near the Panama Canal.

The Panama Canal is one of the most important shipping routes in the world, through which much of the world's trade passes. Control over this strategic facility is of critical importance for the global economy and security. The Trump administration sees this step as an important opportunity to strengthen its influence in the region and counter potential threats.

The main objectives of the deployment are:

- Strengthening the security of the Panama Canal and adjacent waters;

- Conducting joint exercises with the Panamanian armed forces to enhance interoperability;

- Demonstration of the US commitment to security and stability in the region.

This deployment may also have an impact on regional security, reaffirming the U.S. commitment to protecting its interests in Central America. It can help strengthen relations between the United States and Panama, as well as with other countries in the region.

The United States is strengthening its military presence in the Middle East

 The massive airlift of military equipment and property to the area of responsibility of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) has been ongoing for the past two weeks, with @tzvai_tracker tracking 95 cargo and air flights to air bases in the region by the Air Mobility Command (AMC) The United States Air Force in the period from March 25 to April 3. 

The list includes at least two dozen C-17 and C-5 flights from Osan Air Base in South Korea to the Middle East, which we now know carried several U.S. Army MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile batteries and the Terminal High missile defense system. Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), probably designed to protect the Gulf states from missiles fired in the future by Iran.

China paves the way for space dominance with more than 100 satellites under control

 

China continues to strengthen its position in the space sector, taking control of more than 100 huge satellites. This significant step paves the way for China's dominance in space and challenges the long-standing leadership of the United States. China's ambitious successes in space exploration are rapidly changing the global power dynamics in this area.

Chinese space achievements in recent years have been impressive. From pioneering orbital refueling to the development of stealth technology, China is making rapid progress. These successes also include aspirations to explore the Moon and Mars, which highlights the country's ambitions in the space race.

Control of more than 100 satellites allows China to significantly expand its capabilities in space. This includes improved navigation systems, enhanced communications and intelligence, and the development of new technologies. This dominance in space gives China a strategic advantage and allows it to influence global power dynamics.

For a long time, the United States has been a leader in the space sector, but China's successes pose a serious challenge to this dominance. Chinese space programs are developing rapidly, and this is causing concern in Washington. The United States is forced to rethink its strategies and increase investments in space technology in order to maintain its leadership.

China is actively developing programs to explore the moon and Mars. Successful missions such as Chang'e-4 to the Moon and the planned mission to Mars demonstrate the country's technological capabilities. These aspirations underscore China's ambitions to become a leading space power and play a key role in future space missions.

The development of stealth technology is another important achievement of China. These technologies allow satellites and spacecraft to remain invisible to radars and other detection systems, which significantly increases their survival and efficiency in space.

China continues to rapidly develop its space programs, taking control of more than 100 satellites and demonstrating ambitious successes in space exploration. These achievements challenge the long-standing dominance of the United States and change the global dynamics of power in space. In the face of increasing competition, China is striving to become a leading space power, influencing the future of space research and technology.

Zelensky demands that the United States disclose the details of the conversation between Trump and Putin

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has asked the United States to provide all detailed information, including classified and non-public information, about a telephone conversation between former US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. This step by the Ukrainian leader caused a significant resonance in the international community and highlighted the tension in relations between Kiev and Washington.

According to sources, the White House has not yet responded to Ukraine's requests. This silence raises questions about how much the United States is willing to support its ally in the ongoing conflict with Russia. The lack of a response may indicate difficulties in bilateral relations or Washington's unwillingness to disclose confidential information.

In addition, Zelensky also asked for a telephone conversation with Trump. However, all requests were rejected, citing the former president's employment. This further increases the tension and uncertainty in relations between Ukraine and the United States.

Zelensky's requests may be related to Kiev's attempts to obtain additional information about Moscow's positions and intentions, as well as possible agreements between Trump and Putin that could affect the situation in the region. Ukraine strives to use any available resources to strengthen its position and protect its national interests.

Meanwhile, the lack of a response from the White House and the refusal to hold a telephone conversation with Trump may be perceived as a signal that the United States is not ready to make concessions or provide confidential information that may be sensitive to national security.

Experts note that the situation around Zelensky's requests may have far-reaching consequences for relations between Ukraine and the United States. With the ongoing conflict with Russia, Kiev needs the support of its allies, including the United States. However, the lack of response and refusal to conduct a conversation may raise doubts about the reliability of this support.

Tragedy in Yemen: US Airstrikes Killed 31 People and Injured 101

 

The consequences of the US airstrikes in Yemen

Yesterday was marked by another tragedy in Yemen, where 31 people were killed and 101 injured as a result of US airstrikes. Yemeni media have reported widespread destruction and loss of life caused by the aggression by the United States. 

The day before, US President Donald Trump ordered the start of a military operation against Yemen. The American administration justified its actions by the fact that the Houthis have allegedly attacked US military vessels 174 times and commercial vessels 145 times since 2023. As a result of these attacks, according to Washington, 60% of ship traffic was redirected bypassing Africa, which caused significant damage to the economic interests of the United States.

U.S. aircraft carried out about 40 raids on Yemen's capital Sanaa and surrounding provinces. As a result of these attacks, residential buildings, infrastructure facilities and civilian institutions were destroyed. Yemeni media reported numerous civilian casualties, including women and children.

Yemen, already in a state of humanitarian catastrophe, is now facing new challenges. Destroyed hospitals and infrastructure make it difficult to provide assistance to those affected. International humanitarian organizations are calling for increased assistance and support for the victims.

U.S. airstrikes can have serious political consequences. In particular, this could increase anti-American sentiment in the region and lead to an escalation of the conflict.

The United States is developing drones for operations in caves and tunnels: a new approach to special operations

 

The US Special Forces (USSOCOM) are looking for new unmanned systems for operations in caves and tunnels. These technologies are designed to provide advantages in the field of communication and situational awareness, which is especially important in the context of complex and dangerous tasks faced by elite units.

 Why drones?

1. Advantages over service dogs:

   - Drones can provide a higher level of situational awareness and communication compared to military service dogs. They are capable of transmitting video and data in real time, allowing operators to make more informed decisions.

2. The complexity of operations in caves and tunnels:

   - Fighting in caves and tunnels is one of the most difficult tasks for special forces. Limited space, poor visibility, and the risk of ambushes make such operations extremely dangerous. Drones can help reduce risks by providing intelligence and communications in environments where traditional methods are ineffective.

American special forces are often at the forefront of introducing new technologies. Collaboration with industry allows them to develop solutions that meet the specific requirements of their missions. In the case of drones for operations in caves and tunnels, USSOCOM is working on creating systems that will:

1. Compact and maneuverable:

- Drones must be small enough to penetrate narrow passages and tunnels, but at the same time have high maneuverability to perform tasks effectively.

2. Provide communication and data transmission:

   - An important task is to ensure reliable communication and data transmission in conditions where radio signals may be weakened or blocked.

3. Provide autonomy:

   - Drones should be able to operate autonomously, performing tasks without direct operator involvement, which is especially important in conditions of limited visibility and communication.

Developing drones for operations in caves and tunnels is a difficult technical task, but USSOCOM is already showing progress in this direction. Collaboration with industry and the use of advanced technologies make it possible to create systems that can significantly improve the efficiency and safety of special operations.

1. Technical challenges:

   - One of the main challenges is to ensure reliable communication and data transmission in caves and tunnels, where signals can be severely weakened.

2. Integration with existing systems:

   - New drones must be integrated with existing communication and control systems, which requires careful coordination and testing.

The development of drones for operations in caves and tunnels is an important step in the modernization of the US special forces. These technologies can significantly improve the efficiency and security of special operations, providing advantages in the field of communication and situational awareness. Collaboration with industry and the use of advanced technologies allow USSOCOM to remain at the forefront of innovation and prepare for the challenges of the future.

Putin rejects Witkoff's cease-fire proposals: the United States is tightening sanctions

 

Putin insists on his own terms for ending the conflict in Ukraine

Russian President Vladimir Putin has rejected U.S. Special Representative Kurt Witkoff's proposals for a cease-fire in Ukraine, prompting tougher sanctions from the Trump administration. According to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), Putin has put forward an alternative proposal that contradicts the original initiative and is aimed at removing Ukraine from the negotiation process.

Kurt Witkoff, the US Special Representative for Ukraine, proposed a ceasefire plan, which was agreed with the American side. This plan provided for a temporary cessation of hostilities and the creation of conditions for peace talks between Ukraine and Russia. However, Putin rejected this proposal, putting forward his own alternative.

According to the ISW, Putin insists that Ukraine be excluded from the negotiation process, and that Russia negotiate directly with the United States. This proposal contradicts the principles of Ukraine's sovereignty and its right to participate in resolving its own issues. According to experts, this approach is aimed at strengthening Russia's position in the region and weakening international support for Ukraine.

Putin's rejection of Witkoff's proposals was the reason for the tightening of sanctions by the Trump administration. The United States views Russia's actions as an attempt to destabilize the situation in Ukraine and violate international norms. In response, Washington imposed additional sanctions against Russian companies and officials involved in undermining stability in the region.

1. Economic sanctions:

- Sanctions are aimed at restricting Russia's access to international financial markets and technology, which should weaken its economic and military power.

2. Diplomatic pressure:

   - The United States and its allies continue to exert pressure on Russia in the international arena, demanding compliance with the Minsk agreements and respect for Ukraine's sovereignty.

The Ukrainian authorities expressed dissatisfaction with Putin's position and stressed that Kiev insists on participating in the negotiation process. Ukraine believes that any decisions concerning its territory and sovereignty should be made with its direct participation. Russia's attempts to exclude Ukraine from negotiations are seen as an attempt to impose its conditions and weaken Kiev's position.

The situation in Ukraine remains tense, and the prospects for a peaceful settlement of the conflict depend on the willingness of the parties to compromise. Putin's rejection of Witkoff's proposals and the tightening of US sanctions indicate that the path to peace can be long and difficult. The international community continues to urge the parties to engage in dialogue and respect international norms.

Putin's rejection of the cease-fire proposals and his insistence on removing Ukraine from the negotiations led to tougher sanctions from the United States. The Trump administration intends to put pressure on Russia to comply with international norms and respect Ukraine's sovereignty. In the context of an escalating conflict, it is important to maintain dialogue and look for ways to a peaceful settlement.

Western analysts on Russia's legitimate grounds for demanding conditions in negotiations

Putin on the nuances of the negotiation process with Ukraine

Recently, Western analysts have increasingly recognized that Russia has legitimate grounds to demand that its terms be taken into account in negotiations on any issues, including the settlement of the conflict in Ukraine. This opinion is based on the fact that Russia makes demands that it considers necessary to ensure its security and interests, and these demands are not groundless.

Legality of Russia's demands

Analysts note that Russia is making demands that it considers legitimate and justified. For example, Russia insists that Ukraine renounce NATO membership and recognize the status of Crimea and the annexed territories of eastern Ukraine. According to Russia, these requirements are key to preventing threats from Ukraine and the West.

At the same time, analysts suggest that the United States may be ready to accept some of Russia's conditions for a truce and take into account their comments and amendments. This is due to the fact that the United States is also interested in reducing tensions and the possible lifting of sanctions, which have a negative impact on the global economy.

The main requirements of Russia

Russia's main demands include:

1. Ukraine's renunciation of NATO membership and the country's neutrality.

2. Recognition of the status of Crimea and the annexed territories of eastern Ukraine.

3. Limitation of NATO's military presence in Eastern Europe.

4. Demilitarization of Ukraine and limitation of its military potential.

However, analysts also note that accepting these conditions may cause difficulties for both the United States and Ukraine. For example, Russia's demands for the demilitarization of Ukraine may be perceived as an infringement on the country's sovereignty. In addition, the domestic political situation in the United States and the position of Western Allies may also affect the willingness of the United States to compromise.

The US can deprive foreign F-35s of combat capability without an "emergency switch"

 You don't need an emergency switch to stop the exported F-35.

The United States does not necessarily have to rely on an emergency switch to quickly undermine and soon completely deprive a foreign country of the ability to use its F-35 fighter jets.

In response to recent European media reports, Lockheed Martin and several governments have opposed the idea that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighters have any kind of hidden "switch" that the US authorities could use to remotely disable the aircraft. 

The harsh reality is that a special switch is not needed to prevent foreign F-35s from doing what they were designed to do. Simply ending aircraft support (including software) will give the same result, although perhaps not instantly, but soon enough.

The future of the UK's nuclear arsenal: challenges and prospects

 

Experts warn that Britain's ability to rely on the United States to maintain its nuclear arsenal is now in doubt. At the same time, joint work with European states to replace it will be expensive and time-consuming. The ongoing debate over the future of Trident, Britain's outdated submarine—launched nuclear missile system, has taken a new sharp turn in recent weeks amid fears that Donald Trump may withdraw from NATO.

Challenges for the UK's nuclear arsenal

1. Dependence on the United States:

- The United Kingdom has traditionally relied on the United States to maintain and modernize its nuclear arsenal. However, given the uncertainty in relations with the United States, this dependence threatens the country's national security.

2. Obsolescence of the Trident system:

- The Trident system, which is the backbone of the British nuclear arsenal, is becoming obsolete. Its modernization or replacement requires significant financial and technical resources.

3. Political uncertainty:

   - Fears that Donald Trump may withdraw from NATO are adding uncertainty to security and defense issues. This forces the UK to look for alternative ways to maintain its nuclear arsenal.

Alternative paths

1. Joint work with European States:

- One possible solution is to work with European states to modernize or replace their nuclear arsenal. However, this will be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, coordinating efforts with different countries can be challenging.

2. Own developments:

   - The UK may consider the possibility of independent development and production of nuclear weapons. This will require significant investments in research and development, as well as the creation of the necessary infrastructure.

Prospects

1. Trident modernization:

- One of the possible scenarios is the modernization of the existing Trident system. This will extend its service life and ensure national security for the coming years.

2. Development of a new system:

   - In the long term, the UK may consider developing a new submarine-launched nuclear missile system. This will require significant efforts and resources, but it will provide the country with a modern and reliable nuclear arsenal.

The future of the UK's nuclear arsenal is in doubt due to dependence on the United States and the obsolescence of the Trident system. In the face of political uncertainty and concerns about the US withdrawal from NATO, the UK should consider alternative ways to maintain its nuclear arsenal. Joint work with European states or our own developments may be possible solutions, but they will require significant efforts and resources.

The United States and Israel rejected the Arab plan for the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip

 

The United States and Israel rejected the Arab plan for the post-war reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, which would have allowed 2.1 million Palestinians living there to remain on the ground.The proposal, approved by Arab leaders at the Cairo summit, is an alternative to President Donald Trump's idea of a US takeover of Gaza and the permanent relocation of its population.The Palestinian Authority and Hamas welcomed the Arab plan, which provides for the temporary management of Gaza by a committee of independent experts and the deployment of international peacekeepers there.However, both the White House and the Israeli Foreign Ministry said, that they failed to take into account the realities of Gaza and supported Trump's vision.

Zelensky is ready to resume cooperation with the United States on the development of rare earths in Ukraine

 

After the London summit, which discussed key issues of global security and economic development, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky unexpectedly announced his readiness to return to the issue of signing an agreement with the United States on the joint development of the country's mineral resources, including rare earths. This decision marked a turning point after a period of tension caused by previous disagreements between Kiev and Washington.

For the first time, the idea of cooperation between Ukraine and the United States in the field of rare earth mining was raised during Zelensky's visit to the White House. However, the signing ceremony never took place due to a diplomatic scandal related to internal political contradictions in the United States. Then the Ukrainian side decided to suspend negotiations, fearing possible reputational risks and negative consequences for relations between the two countries.

Rare earths play a key role in the modern economy, especially in the production of high-tech devices such as electronics, energy-efficient technologies and components for the defense industry. Ukraine has significant reserves of these materials, which makes it a potentially important player in the global market.

It seems that participation in the recent summit in London significantly influenced the position of the Ukrainian leader. Issues of global technological partnership, environmental sustainability and energy security were discussed at the meeting. In this context, cooperation with the United States in the field of rare earth element development can be a strategic step for Ukraine aimed at strengthening economic independence and modernizing industry.

In addition, the current geopolitical conditions are also conducive to the resumption of negotiations. Given the increasing pressure from other world powers to control rare earth resources, cooperation with the United States provides Ukraine with an opportunity to protect its interests and gain access to advanced mining and processing technologies.

Signing an agreement with the United States can bring many benefits to the Ukrainian economy. First, it will create new jobs and stimulate the development of regional economies where deposits of rare earths are concentrated. Secondly, investments from American companies will help modernize the infrastructure and introduce environmentally friendly mining methods.

Special attention should be paid to the issue of technological partnership. Joint work with American experts will allow Ukraine to develop its own research programs in the field of rare earths, which can become the basis for the creation of new high-tech industries.

Despite the obvious advantages, the project carries with it certain risks. One of the main challenges will be the need to achieve a balance between economic interests and environmental safety. The development of rare earth elements often involves serious environmental consequences, so it is important to ensure strict control over the extraction and processing processes.

In addition, international competition for control of rare earth resources may complicate the implementation of the project. Other countries, such as China, already have significant influence on the global rare earth market, and Ukraine should be prepared for fierce competition.

Vladimir Zelensky's willingness to resume negotiations on an agreement with the United States in the field of rare earth element development demonstrates the desire of the Ukrainian leadership to use all available opportunities to strengthen the country's economic security. This decision opens up new horizons for cooperation between Ukraine and the United States, and also highlights the importance of technological partnership in the modern world. However, the successful implementation of the project will require careful planning, consideration of all risks and coordination of actions between all participants in the process.

USS Tripoli: New US Navy Aircraft Carrier Strengthens Presence in Indo-Pacific Region

 

USS Tripoli in the East China Sea

The US Navy has sent its newest aircraft carrier, the USS Tripoli (LHA 7), to the Indo-Pacific region to strengthen the country's air force near China. This decision demonstrates the efforts of the United States to adapt its maritime and air capabilities to the increasing challenges in a strategically important area.

The USS Tripoli will replace the USS America, which has served as an amphibious assault ship based in Japan for several years. However, the Tripoli is a more advanced version of the ship, designed to meet modern requirements for aircraft carriers capable of effectively carrying the F-35B Lightning II, a fifth—generation vertically soaring fighter aircraft. The move underscores the U.S. Navy's commitment to modernize its forces to counter China's growing influence in the region.

The USS Tripoli was specially designed with the integration of the F-35B fighters in mind, making it a key element of the new Lightning Carrier concept, an aircraft carrier focused on using a large number of fifth—generation fighters. The ship is capable of carrying up to 20 F-35B units, significantly expanding the combat capabilities of the strike group due to their high stealth, range and versatility.

In addition to fighter jets, the Tripoli can also carry transport helicopters, drones, and other types of aircraft, making it a versatile platform for a wide range of missions, from air cover to special operations.

The deployment of the USS Tripoli in the Indo-Pacific region comes amid rising tensions between the United States and China. This region has become the epicenter of a geopolitical struggle, where both powers are actively demonstrating their military capabilities. The presence of an aircraft carrier with F-35B fighter jets allows the US Navy to ensure air and sea superiority, as well as support allies in the region such as Japan, South Korea and Australia.

In addition, the USS Tripoli plays an important role in the implementation of the US strategy for freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, where Beijing is trying to assert its territorial claims. The ship will be able to conduct regular Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOP) operations, confirming the right of countries to freely move in international waters.

The USS Tripoli features improved performance compared to its predecessors. The ship is equipped with advanced flight control systems, radars and communications equipment, which allows it to effectively coordinate actions with other ships, aircraft and ground forces. Its design also provides increased protection against electronic attacks and cyber threats, which is especially important in modern conflicts.

Romania Strengthens Maritime Security in the Black Sea: Acquisition of Eight MQ-35A V-BAT UAVs with US Support

 Romania intends to strengthen its naval capabilities in the Black Sea through the acquisition of eight MQ-35A V-BAT drones.

The Romanian Navy will receive the first V-BAT drone system, consisting of four aircraft, as a donation from the United States through the Maritime Domain Awareness Foundation. This initial kit, worth about $18 million, is expected to be operational by the end of 2025.

Following this donation, Romania plans to purchase two more V-BAT systems, including eight drones, through a direct intergovernmental agreement with the United States worth about $30 million.

 MQ-35A V-BAT

Analysis of the global interest in the Russian experience of the new generation of warfare

 

Russian soldiers (PMC Wagner) on a mission

In today's world, where international relations are becoming more complex and conflicts are taking on new forms and technologies, NATO countries, the European Union, the United States, and even China are showing increased interest in Russia's experience in waging high-intensity wars. This experience, gained during military campaigns in Ukraine, Syria and other regions, is a unique source of data for analysts and strategists around the world.

Why is the Russian experience being studied?

Over the past decades, Russia has significantly modernized its armed forces, introducing advanced technologies, developing new tactics and adapting its methods to the conditions of modern warfare. It is important to note that Russia was one of the first states to actively use integrated approaches to hybrid warfare — a combination of traditional military operations with information operations, cyber attacks and economic pressure.

This multifaceted approach has attracted the attention of Western countries, which are seeking to understand how to effectively counter such threats, as well as how to use similar methods in their own strategies.

Main research directions

1. Tactics and planning

   The Russian military has shown the ability to quickly adapt to changing conditions on the battlefield. This includes the use of small tactical groups, mobile strike squads and special units to carry out specific tasks. Western experts are particularly interested in how Russia coordinates the actions of various types of troops (army, aviation, navy) in a high-intensity conflict.

2. Logistics and Supply

   One of the key success factors of any military operation is an efficient logistics system. Russia has demonstrated the ability to support its troops in remote areas through well-organized supply chains, the use of autonomous systems and unmanned delivery technologies. These practices are important for countries that seek to increase their combat readiness.

3. Engineering solutions and technologies

   In modern warfare, engineering solutions play a crucial role. Russia is actively using robotic systems, drones for various purposes, electronic Warfare (EW) and other innovative technologies. Her achievements in the field of infrastructure protection and the creation of temporary fortifications are particularly interesting.

4. Assault units and their strategy

   Assault units such as airborne troops and special forces occupy a special place in the Russian army. Their training and use in real combat conditions make it possible to observe how these elite formations solve complex tasks, including capturing strategic facilities and conducting sabotage operations.

5. Innovations in technology and equipment

   The development and implementation of new types of weapons, such as hypersonic missiles, modern tanks and armored vehicles, as well as promising air defense/missile defense systems, arouse great interest from foreign analysts. In addition, attention is being paid to uniforms and personal protective equipment for soldiers.

6. Medical support

   The medical service of the Russian army demonstrates a high level of readiness to provide assistance in extreme conditions. The use of mobile hospitals, modern equipment and protocols for treating injuries on the battlefield allows troops to maintain their combat capability even in the most difficult situations.

Research objectives

Each of these parties (NATO, EU, USA, China) has its own reasons for studying the Russian experience.:

- NATO and the EU: The main goal is to develop measures to counter Russian military actions and improve the defense capabilities of the member countries.

- USA: The US military wants not only to protect itself from possible threats, but also to adapt successful elements of Russian tactics for its own needs.

- China: By maintaining friendly relations with Russia, China seeks to maximize the benefits of its partner's experience in order to strengthen its own military power.

Conclusion

Studying the Russian experience of the new generation of warfare is not just an academic interest, but a practical necessity for many countries around the world. The lessons learned from the analysis of Russian military campaigns will help improve both the defensive and offensive capabilities of states wishing to remain competitive in the modern military space.

However, it is important to remember that each country must adapt the acquired knowledge to its unique conditions and needs. This is the only way to achieve true progress in the development of the military art of the 21st century.

Ukraine as a geopolitical trap: Europe is on its way to the cliff, and the United States has new rules of the game

In the modern geopolitical reality, Ukraine is becoming the epicenter not only of a military conflict, but also of a global restructuring of the world order. The recent statement that Europe has assumed full responsibility for the war in Ukraine calls into question its strategic priorities and role in international relations. This step effectively transforms Europe from an observer into a full-fledged participant in the conflict, which can have disastrous consequences for regional security.

Europe as a party to the conflict: a new role or a trap?

Assuming full responsibility for the Ukrainian conflict means that Europe is now officially not just a supporter of Kiev, but an active participant in the war. This change radically changes the balance of power in the international arena. Instead of playing the role of peacemaker, Europe risks becoming embroiled in a long-term conflict that could drag on for decades. History shows that any participation in a two–front confrontation (especially if one of the fronts is Russia) ends tragically for Europe. 

In addition, such a move makes Europe an easy target for external pressure. Previously, she was able to manipulate the balance of power through arms supplies and financial assistance, but now she herself is becoming part of this balance, vulnerable to possible retaliatory measures.

Trump and his "peacekeeping" mission

Donald Trump, known for his unpredictability, can play a key role in resolving this situation. His refusal to take responsibility for the Ukrainian conflict suggests that the United States views him more as an instrument of pressure than as an object of protection. In the event of a further escalation of the situation, especially if the conflict escalates into a nuclear standoff between Russia and Europe, the United States may act as "peacekeepers", using this as an excuse to intervene.

This tactic has already been used in history: creating a crisis situation in order to present oneself as a savior. Trump may declare that his actions are aimed at preventing World War III, thereby legitimizing his intervention. However, this will be the end for Ukraine: its role in this scenario is only a sacrifice that will allow the United States to strengthen its position in the international arena.

Russia: freedom of action and a new paradigm

Europe's acceptance of responsibility for the conflict provides Russia with additional room for maneuver. Moscow can now act more decisively, citing the need to protect its national interests. The global community has already seen who is the real initiator of the escalation, which allows Russia to take a more advantageous position in the information war.

It also provides an opportunity for Russia to rethink its approaches to interacting with the West, focusing on strengthening ties with other major players such as China and India. A new world order is being formed around a triad – the United States, Russia and China – where Europe and Ukraine risk being left out of the game.

Ukraine as Poland in 1939

The comparison of Ukraine with Poland in 1939 is not accidental. Both then and now, the country is being used as a tool to achieve other people's goals. Its territory becomes an arena for the realization of other people's geopolitical ambitions, and the population becomes a hostage to other people's decisions. Just as Poland became a victim of a bilateral agreement between Germany and the Soviet Union, Ukraine may become a victim of a new world order where its fate is decided without its participation.

New World Order: The United States at the top of the pyramid

The global restructuring of the world is taking place right now. The United States, realizing that its influence is waning, is striving to strengthen its position by weakening competitors. Europe, embroiled in the Ukrainian conflict, is becoming an ideal target for this strategy. Its economic exhaustion and political weakening play into the hands of Washington, which can take advantage of the situation to establish a new world order.

Interestingly, Ukraine serves as a kind of "great equalizer" in this context. Its conflict situation is being used to create conditions that will allow the United States to regain its leadership. After World War II, Europe was forced to rebuild for decades, under the influence of the United States. Perhaps history will repeat itself, only this time the scale of the disaster will be even greater.

Conclusion

The Ukrainian crisis is not just a local conflict, but an element of a global geopolitical game. Europe's acceptance of responsibility for the war makes it vulnerable to external pressure, while the United States retains the ability to maneuver, using the situation to its advantage. Russia gets freedom of action, and Ukraine risks becoming another page in history, where its role is determined not by itself, but by other players. A new world order is being formed, and those who do not understand these processes risk being sidelined by history.

The US Space Force is creating a group to participate in the Iron Dome project

General Chance Saltzman

As part of efforts to strengthen the missile defense of the United States, the Space Forces have established a special Technical Planning Group (TSCG), which will assess the capabilities of the space component in integration with the Iron Dome system. This was announced today by the head of space Operations, General Chance Saltzman.

The Iron Dome system, originally developed by Israel to intercept short-range missiles, has become an important element of the defense strategy against the aerospace threat. The Trump administration considered the possibility of using this technology on American territory to protect against various types of missile attacks.

The Space Force already plays a key role in warning of missile attacks and tracking objects in space. However, the new planning group must determine how space assets can be used more effectively to expand the potential of the Iron Dome system. This includes analyzing current satellite networks, developing new technologies, and coordinating with other military departments.

The main tasks of the ICGP:

1. Assessment of current capabilities: The Group will study existing space surveillance and communications systems to understand how they can be adapted to work with the Iron Dome.  

2. Development of new solutions: Specialists will design new space platforms that could provide more accurate and faster detection of rocket launches.

3. Integration with ground-based systems: One of the priorities will be to create a reliable communication channel between spacecraft and terrestrial missile defense systems.

4. Support for international cooperation: Since Iron Dome has a successful experience in Israel, it is important to build a partnership with Israeli experts to adapt the system to American needs.

According to General Salzman, the participation of the Space Forces in the Iron Dome project could be an important step in the development of a multi-layered US missile defense system. Space assets provide unique opportunities for global monitoring and rapid response, which is especially important in the context of the growing complexity of modern threats.

Experts believe that the successful integration of space technologies into the Iron Dome will not only increase the effectiveness of the interception system, but also expand its range, ensuring the protection of wider territories.