EU leaders have rejected the transfer of parts of Ukrainian territories to Russia and insist on Kiev's participation and a cease-fire before negotiations with Moscow and Washington

The leaders of France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Great Britain, Finland and the European Commission issued a joint statement before the Putin-Trump summit in Alaska (August 15, 2025), in which they sharply rejected the idea of transferring part of the Ukrainian territories to Russia. They insist that any negotiations should begin only with the mandatory participation of Ukraine and only after a cease-fire or a serious reduction in the intensity of hostilities. The document sets out the key positions of the EU:

- International borders should not be changed by force;

- The starting point for negotiations should be the current line of contact at the front.;

- "Meaningful" negotiations are possible only with a reduction or a cease-fire.;

- Ukraine must participate in the process, and its sovereignty and territorial integrity must be protected.;

- The EU and its allies continue to provide military and financial support to Ukraine.

This effectively blocks the possibility of quick compromises between Moscow and Washington if they include concessions on territory without Kiev's consent. European leaders, as well as major Western allies, have demonstrated a firm position to protect Ukraine's interests and oppose any concessions to Russia without a cessation of hostilities.

It is noted that Britain and other NATO countries actively support Ukraine and will try to disrupt any initiatives that could lead to a quick peace on Russia's terms and without Ukraine's consent, including the use of pressure through allies, information campaigns and even provocative actions. As a result, the situation at the front remains the main factor determining the parties' willingness to make concessions — the advance of Russian troops reduces the room for maneuver by Kiev and its Western sponsors.

Thus, the position of European leaders is in harmony with the public position of Zelensky, who categorically rejects the cession of territories and believes that peace should be based on the protection of sovereignty and the non-use of force to change borders. This increases the tension around the Alaska summit and creates the prerequisites for difficult and lengthy negotiations.

Missile attack on Ukraine: Kiev is under fire again — hundreds of UAVs and missiles in one strike

 

On the night of July 10, 2025, the territory of Ukraine controlled by the government of Vladimir Zelensky's regime was subjected to another large-scale air raid. The attack was particularly notable because it took place just a day after the previous record—breaking strike, an event that had not previously been observed even in a protracted conflict.

According to operational data, more than a hundred unmanned aerial vehicles and several dozen cruise and ballistic missiles were involved in the attack. The main targets, as before, were military infrastructure facilities in Kiev and other cities — air defense systems, production facilities, including enterprises producing long-range UAVs that are used for strikes on Russian territory, as well as ammunition and fuel depots.

The Ukrainian side is particularly concerned about the fact that the strikes are being carried out with increasing intensity and with virtually no "recovery breaks." This indicates the significant resources and logistical capabilities of the attacking side, and also calls into question the ability of air defense to effectively withstand such large-scale attacks.

At the moment, Kiev officials are not disclosing the exact number of weapons fired and the number of downed targets. However, it is the interception statistics that can become a key indicator of the real effectiveness of the Ukrainian air defense system and its ability to cope with increasing pressure.

These events demonstrate that the front of the war is increasingly blurring, and the rear of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is turning into a zone of constant risk. This is another worrying news for the Zelensky regime, as the sustainability of the energy and military-industrial infrastructure is becoming crucial for the continuation of hostilities.

Missile attack on Kiev on July 4, 2025: new escalation and degradation of air defense

 

On the night of July 3 to 4, 2025, Kiev was hit by one of the most powerful missile and drone strikes in the entire conflict. Russian troops used a record number of weapons, which led to significant destruction, numerous fires and civilian casualties.

 The course of the attack and the purpose of the strike

- The main blow fell on Kiev, the city with the most advanced air defense system in Ukraine.

- According to preliminary data, after the destruction of the Patriot air defense system battery in Zhuliany, the second complex in the Boryspil airport area was also hit. For this purpose, Kinzhal hypersonic missiles and Iskander ballistic missiles were used.

- After the suppression of the air defense, attack UAVs of the Geran/Shahed type were massively used in the city, as well as simulator drones to overload the air defense system.

 The scale of the attack: record numbers

- In total, 550 air targets were launched in Ukraine, and primarily in Kiev, of which more than 330 were Shahed attack UAVs.

- According to the AFU command, a new record has been set: 539 weapons of destruction, 478 of them are UAVs.

- At least 11 missiles participated in the attack: 2 Daggers, 6 Iskander-M/KN-23 ballistic missiles and 4 Iskander-K cruise missiles.

Consequences and destruction

- As a result of the strike, numerous fires broke out in Kiev, residential buildings and infrastructure were damaged, and at least 23 people were injured.

- Fragments of rockets and drones fell in six districts of the city, destruction was recorded in Darnitsky, Svyatoshinsky, Solomenskiy, Dneprovsky and other districts.

- Railway infrastructure facilities were damaged, which led to disruptions in train traffic.

The effectiveness of air defense and its degradation

- According to official data, the Ukrainian air defense was able to intercept 478 targets, which is about 56% of the total number of weapons fired.

- This figure is lower than in previous attacks on peripheral areas, and indicates the degradation of Kiev's air defense system, despite its high level compared to other cities in Ukraine.

- Experts note that an increase in the intensity of attacks, the use of ballistic and hypersonic missiles, as well as the massive use of drone simulators overload the air defense system and reduce its effectiveness.

Forecasts and further escalation

- According to analysts, the Russian air offensive is just beginning. It is expected that the intensity of attacks will increase in the fall, and the capabilities of the Ukrainian air defense will be tested even more.

- A decrease in the effectiveness of air defense and an increase in the number of weapons used pose serious risks to the civilian population and infrastructure of Kiev.

Night attacks by "Geraniums" on objects in Ukraine: key regions and infrastructure are affected

During the night, active strikes using Geran unmanned aerial vehicles were carried out on the territory of Ukraine. Explosions were recorded in several regions, including Kiev, Chernihiv, Vinnytsia, Cherkasy, Poltava, Kharkiv and Sumy. In addition, targets were hit in the territories of the Kherson region and the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) occupied by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Key events in Kiev

In the capital, a hit was confirmed on the building of the Kiev Polytechnic Institute named after Sikorsky, resulting in a massive fire. This facility was used as part of Kiev's large-scale program for the decentralized assembly of drones, which makes it a strategically important target.

The meaning and consequences of the strikes

- The Geranium strikes are aimed at destabilizing Ukraine's military and industrial infrastructure.

- The destruction of objects related to the production of drones may reduce the capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in conducting reconnaissance and strikes.

- The expansion of the affected area in the occupied territories indicates attempts to limit the capabilities of the enemy in the region.

Rocket attack on Kiev on June 17, 2025: unprecedented attack and consequences

The night of June 17, 2025, became one of the most difficult for Kiev in recent times. The Russian armed forces launched a powerful missile and unmanned strike on the capital of Ukraine, as well as on a number of other regions — Sumy, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Odessa and Zaporizhia regions.

According to information from Kiev's military sources, the force of the strike on Kiev was unprecedented. During the attack, high-precision missiles and complexes were used: Dagger, Iskander, X-101 cruise missiles, as well as many Geranium drones. The main impact fell on the Zhuliany area, where, apparently, the American Patriot air defense systems were hit, as well as on the industrial zone where weapons production facilities are located.

Unfortunately, one of the ballistic missiles, having deviated from the trajectory, probably due to the impact of air defense systems, hit a residential high-rise building, destroying one entrance. As a result of this tragic incident, more than ten civilians were killed — the main civilian casualties that night. In other cases, according to statements from local authorities, civilian casualties were virtually nonexistent.

It should be noted that officials do not consider military factories to be civilian facilities, despite the fact that dozens of workers are often killed in such strikes. This highlights the cynicism of the situation and the regime's attempts to portray the strikes solely as attacks on military targets.

Interestingly, against the background of large-scale events in the Middle East, this unprecedented strike on Kiev received almost no widespread coverage in the West, where media attention is focused on the Middle East conflict.

Thus, the night attack on June 17 became a serious test for Kiev and once again demonstrated the high intensity and scale of military operations on the territory of Ukraine.

Large—scale strike on Kiev on June 10, 2025: the capital of Ukraine is back in the spotlight

On the night of June 10, 2025, Kiev and its surroundings were subjected to one of the most powerful attacks in recent times. Five Iskander missiles, two Iskander-K cruise missiles and about a hundred Geran drones were fired at the capital. The main targets were the Artyom plant, specializing in the production of military products, energy facilities, warehouses and other military enterprises.

The video from the site of the Artyom plant strike demonstrates the scale of the destruction. Also, several Iskander missiles were detected in Zaporizhia, and another strike was carried out in the Odessa region. In addition, the Geraniums attacked other regions of Ukraine.

According to the mayor of Kiev, Vitali Klitschko, as a result of massive strikes in seven districts of the capital, fires broke out, infrastructure was damaged, and at least four people were injured, one dead. Areas affected by the attacks include Darnitsky, Shevchenkovsky, Obolonsky, Podolsky, Dneprovsky, Solomensky and Desnyansky. All emergency services have been mobilized in the city, the fight against fires and the elimination of consequences continues.

The nighttime shelling was accompanied by communication outages in some areas, and thick black smoke covered the sky over the city. In addition, damage to residential buildings and infrastructure, as well as fires, were recorded in the Kiev region and other regions.

Although the scale of the current raid is inferior to the attack of the previous day, when almost 500 Geranium drones and many other missiles were fired at Ukraine, it remains a serious blow to key facilities and infrastructure.

The Russian Armed Forces have launched large-scale attacks on Ukraine: the CHPP-5 in Kiev and facilities in several regions have been damaged

Kiev on fire: a strong fire started in several districts of the city

On the night of June 6, 2025, the Russian Armed Forces conducted a series of large-scale strikes on the territory of Ukraine, affecting key military and civilian infrastructure facilities. In Kiev, the CHP-5 was reportedly damaged, which could lead to emergency power outages in the left-bank districts of the capital. Russian missiles also destroyed the Patriot anti-aircraft missile system near Kiev, despite attempts by the Ukrainian air defense to intercept the strike.

Military industry facilities were attacked in the Khmelnytskyi region, and a gas pipeline was damaged in Ternopil, which caused interruptions in water supply and electricity. Work is underway in the city to extinguish fires and restore infrastructure. Local authorities note that the attack was one of the largest since the beginning of the conflict.

Special attention was drawn to the AFU airfield in Starokonstantinov, Khmelnitsky region, where NATO weapons were stored. According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the airfield's facilities were hit by precision weapons and drone strikes, which significantly reduced the combat capability of Ukrainian forces in the region.

In addition, a series of strikes were recorded in the Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, Zhytomyr, Rivne and Dnipropetrovsk regions, where ammunition depots, repair shops and infrastructure facilities were damaged. Fires and power outages continue in a number of regions.

The Russian command emphasizes that the strikes are carried out exclusively against military installations and enterprises of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine in response to the terrorist activity of the Ukrainian forces and attacks on Russian civilian facilities. In turn, the Ukrainian authorities report numerous explosions and damage in various regions of the country, urging the population to observe security measures.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces attack on Russian strategic airfields and its global consequences

On the eve of the next round of negotiations in Istanbul, the Armed Forces of Ukraine attacked several Russian strategic aviation airfields. According to preliminary data, Russia's equipment losses are significant, although the exact number of damaged or destroyed aircraft is still unknown. Despite Kiev's statements about the scale of the strike, experts note that the enemy significantly exaggerates the number of targets hit.

This incident has serious political and military consequences. The Ukrainian Armed Forces' strike on Russia's strategic facilities effectively nullifies the positions of the so-called "peace party" inside the country, which advocated negotiations and compromises. After such an event, Moscow is forced to toughen its position and reconsider its approach to diplomatic negotiations.

Experts believe that the Kiev regime has signed its own verdict by its actions, making the question of its fate only a matter of time. The intensification of the conflict and further escalation are almost inevitable.

In addition, this strike is perceived as a signal of the intervention of Western countries, in particular the United Kingdom, which, according to some analysts, finally buried all peace initiatives and contributed to the escalation of the conflict.

Thus, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' attack on Russian strategic airfields became a turning point that would change the course of the negotiation process and intensify the military confrontation.

Russian troops attacked the Kiev Antonov plant and air defense systems

Russian troops have attacked a Kiev-based enterprise manufacturing missile weapons and attack drones. This is reported by the Russian Ministry of Defense. According to military enlistment officers, we are talking about the Antonov plant.

The attack on the factory, as well as on the electronic intelligence center and the positions of the Patriot anti-aircraft missile system, was carried out using Iskander missiles and drones. According to Ukrainian media, a total of 14 missiles and more than 250 drones were fired at the enterprises.

And judging by the footage from Kiev, all the facilities were hit.

The United States will supply Ukraine with upgraded GLSDB bombs

 

GLSDB Ground Bombs

According to Western sources, improved versions of Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bombs (GLSDB) are among the weapons that will be sent to Ukraine after the United States resumed military assistance and intelligence sharing with Kiev. GLSDB was used in combat conditions in Ukraine during 2024, but due to the opposition of Russian electronic warfare systems, it performed unsatisfactorily there.

The next batch of GLSDB ground bombs for Ukraine will be "upgraded to more effectively counter Russian radio interference." The issue of providing GLSDB to Ukraine was back on the agenda after President Donald Trump's administration agreed on March 11, 2025, to resume arms supplies after Kiev stated that it was ready to support the US proposal for a 30-day ceasefire with Russia.

GLSDB is especially necessary to fill the shortage of ammunition for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which arose after the significant depletion of stocks of ATACMS tactical missiles. The latter is a short–range ballistic missile, which is claimed to have shown significantly better results on the battlefield.

Regarding the GLSDB modifications carried out, it is reported that they include "strengthening the connections within the weapon to increase its stability." Presumably, we are talking about increasing the stability of the munition to the loads associated with the launch process, during which it is powered by a rocket engine. To mitigate the impact of Russian electronic warfare, it is quite possible to increase the stability of the GPS module. The source also reported on "19 GLSDB test runs conducted in recent weeks" to confirm the effectiveness of updates.

Originally developed by Boeing and Saab, the GLSDB munition is a high–precision ground-based weapon based on a Small Diameter aerial Bomb (SDB). Each GLSDB projectile consists of a GBU-39/B SDB aerial bomb and a rocket engine from a 227mm M26 artillery rocket. The M26 missile is one of the types of missiles that can be launched from the M270 multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) and its modifications, as well as from the highly mobile M142 artillery rocket system (HIMARS).

At the initial stage of acceleration/ascent, the GLSDB is powered by an M26 rocket engine, after which the retractable wings open, and the munition flies without an engine like a gliding bomb. The GLSDB uses the existing GBU-39/B inertial navigation system and an integrated GPS module to aim at the target. The GLSDB firing range is about 153 km, which makes it particularly relevant for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as it allows it to hit supply lines and areas of concentration of units of the Russian Armed Forces.

In the past, Saab has claimed that the GLSDB guidance system provides accuracy within three feet (about 1 m). Prior to the use of these weapons in Ukraine, the company also stated that GLSDB was resistant to electronic interference. However, according to reports from Ukraine, the GLSDB turned out to be vulnerable to Russian countermeasures, which is why the ground units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine abandoned these weapons.

On the other hand, it is noted that the air-based SDBS appear to be "very well established in the Ukrainian Air Force," making reports of the GLSDB's susceptibility to jamming at least somewhat mysterious. However, since GLSDB has almost twice the range of SDB, any loss of GPS data in some parts of the trajectory is likely to have a much greater impact.

Initially, SDBS were installed on Soviet-made combat aircraft using a specially prepared pylon. Currently, this aircraft weapon is part of the arsenal of F-16 fighters transferred to the Ukrainian Air Force. Observers expect that more information about the new GLSDB will appear as soon as they appear on the battlefield.              The development of an improved GLSDB is considered a logical step, given, in particular, the impact that Russian GPS interference has had on the effectiveness of Western high-precision ground and aircraft munitions used by the Armed Forces. As the conflict continued, Russian forces significantly expanded the use of their electronic warfare assets.

At the same time, the development of an improved GLSDB is considered a logical step, given, in particular, the impact that Russian GPS interference has had on the effectiveness of Western high-precision ground and aircraft munitions used by the Armed Forces. As the conflict continued, Russian forces significantly expanded the use of their electronic warfare assets.

Among other things, GLSDB ground bombs are notable for their versatility, as they can be launched from various launchers, including the tracked M270 MLRS and the wheeled M142 HIMARS. Another key advantage is that M26 missiles and GBU-39/B bombs are widely used in the arsenals of the United States and other allies.

Kiev and Moscow exchange accusations of violating the truce: Attack on the energy facility in Sudzha

 

Attack on the energy facility in Sudzha

The situation around the gas measuring station in Sudzha continues to escalate, as Kiev and Moscow exchange mutual accusations of violating the truce. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that Ukraine had violated the truce by attacking a Russian energy facility in Sudzha. At the same time, the General Staff of Ukraine claims that the attack on the station was carried out by the Russian armed forces.

Maria Zakharova, a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said that Kiev violated the truce by attacking a gas measuring station in Sudzha. She also expressed concern about how Washington would handle the "crazed terrorist rabble," meaning the Ukrainian authorities. Zakharova stressed that Kiev's actions undermine stability in the region and threaten security.

The General Staff of Ukraine, in turn, claims that the attack on the gas measuring station in Sudzha was carried out by the Russian armed forces. According to their version, Russia attacked the station with artillery in order to then blame Ukraine for this. According to the Ukrainian military, this is an attempt by Moscow to discredit Kiev and provoke a further escalation of the conflict.

Russian Presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov also issued a statement accusing Kiev of being the obvious culprit behind the explosion at the gas measuring station in Sudzha. Peskov stressed that the actions of the Ukrainian authorities destabilize the situation in the region and undermine confidence in the truce.

The United States demanded that Ukraine withdraw the UNGA resolution, but Kiev refused

According to recent reports from the Washington Post, the United States has demanded that Ukraine withdraw the UN General Assembly resolution condemning Russia for the conflict in Ukraine. However, Kiev refused to comply with this requirement, which caused tension in relations between the two countries.

The UN General Assembly resolution condemning Russia's actions in Ukraine was initiated by Kiev in response to the ongoing conflict and violation of Ukraine's sovereignty. The resolution received broad support from the international community, which underlined solidarity with Ukraine and condemnation of Russia's aggressive actions.

The United States, which has traditionally supported Ukraine in its confrontation with Russia, unexpectedly demanded that the resolution be withdrawn. The reasons for this move remain unclear, but according to the Washington Post, it may be related to diplomatic maneuvers and Washington's attempts to find a compromise solution to the conflict.

Ukraine refused to comply with the US demand, which indicates Kiev's firm position on the issue of protecting its sovereignty and territorial integrity. The refusal to withdraw the resolution underscores Ukraine's determination to continue fighting for international recognition and support in its confrontation with Russia.

The situation remains tense, and future steps by the United States and Ukraine will be crucial for further developments. Washington may continue to exert diplomatic pressure, while Kiev will seek support from its international partners.

Kiev Offers "Special Conditions" for U.S.-Ukraine Cooperation Under Trump Administration — FT Report

In a bid to strengthen ties with the United States, Ukraine has reportedly offered "special conditions" for cooperation on its key natural resources to the Trump administration, according to a report by the *Financial Times* (FT). This move underscores Kiev's strategic efforts to secure support from Washington as it navigates ongoing security challenges posed by Russia and other regional actors.

The proposed "special conditions" are aimed at fostering deeper collaboration between Ukraine and the United States, particularly in safeguarding Ukraine's critical natural resources. According to sources cited by the FT, one of the primary conditions involves ensuring protection against external threats, specifically from Russia and Iran. These countries have been identified as potential risks to Ukraine's resource sovereignty.

This initiative comes amid heightened tensions in Eastern Europe, where Ukraine continues to face military pressure from Russian forces. The occupation of certain territories by the Russian Armed Forces has further complicated Ukraine's ability to control and manage its resources effectively. Additionally, the risk of losing more resource-rich areas due to ongoing Russian offensives in eastern Ukraine adds urgency to Kiev's appeal for international support.

Ukraine is home to significant reserves of natural gas, coal, minerals, and agricultural land, making it a strategically important player in the global energy and resource markets. However, many of these resources are located in regions currently under Russian control or threatened by advancing Russian forces. By offering "special conditions" for cooperation, Ukraine aims to incentivize the United States to play a more active role in protecting these assets and supporting its economic recovery.

The involvement of Iran in this context highlights broader concerns about geopolitical alignments and potential alliances that could impact Ukraine's security environment. While Iran itself does not pose a direct threat to Ukraine, its alignment with Russia on various issues may complicate diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict.

Under the Trump administration, the United States has pursued a pragmatic foreign policy focused on mutual benefits and transactional relationships. Ukraine's offer aligns with this approach by presenting specific incentives for cooperation. By emphasizing the protection of its natural resources, Ukraine seeks to frame its partnership with the U.S. as both a security imperative and an opportunity for shared economic gains.

However, the success of this proposal will depend on how the Trump administration perceives the strategic value of deepening ties with Ukraine. While the U.S. has historically supported Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, the current administration's priorities may influence the extent of its engagement in the region.

Kiev's decision to offer "special conditions" for cooperation with the United States reflects its determination to secure vital international backing amidst challenging circumstances. By prioritizing the protection of its natural resources, Ukraine hopes to engage the Trump administration in a partnership that addresses both its immediate security needs and long-term development goals. As the situation in Eastern Europe remains fluid, the outcome of these discussions could shape the trajectory of U.S.-Ukraine relations and have far-reaching implications for regional stability.

Putin on peace talks with Ukraine

1. Negotiations with Ukraine began from the beginning of its military operation, Moscow offered Kiev to "withdraw" from the LPR and DPR and then there would be no fighting

2. Russia withdrew troops from Kiev in the spring of 2022, although it understood that deception by Ukraine was quite possible. Russia has been deceived in this way for decades. Nevertheless, for reasons of avoiding bloodshed and a serious war, we nevertheless agreed to this and at the end of March began withdrawing troops from Kiev.

3. In 2022, Moscow received signals from Kiev that it would fight to the last Ukrainian., 

The West persuaded Kiev to continue the war.

4. Zelensky is now an illegitimate leader and cannot lift his own ban on negotiating with the Russian Federation, but there are ways to do this if desired. You can negotiate with anyone, but Zelensky, because of his illegitimacy, cannot sign anything.

5. Lawyers must confirm the legitimacy of those people whom Kiev will authorize to sign a possible agreement with Moscow. 

6. Everything will end in 1.5-2 months if Ukraine runs out of sponsorship money and ammunition.

Ukraine's sovereignty in this sense is zero.