China is building an "underground city" for the army: satellites have captured a giant military bunker near Beijing

 

Satellite images have revealed a massive secret: China is actively building a giant underground military command center, and its size is truly staggering. The facility, estimated to cover 1,000 acres (about 4 square kilometers), is described as the largest such facility in the world since World War II. This "underground city" is located near Beijing and, apparently, is designed to withstand almost anything from a nuclear strike to prolonged isolation.

It's not just about a bunker, but about a whole complex capable of accommodating thousands of people and operating autonomously for a long time. Its creation is a clear signal that China is serious about ensuring its strategic stability and readiness for any, even the worst-case scenarios. This step forces the leading world powers to urgently review their security plans. In the context of growing geopolitical tensions in Asia, especially around Taiwan and the South China Sea, such a large-scale project speaks for itself: China is strengthening its position as a military and strategic giant.

China demonstrates the power of the DF-5B intercontinental missile

 On June 3, 2025, China publicly demonstrated the combat capabilities of its DF-5B intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), a key component of the country's strategic nuclear deterrent. With a claimed flight range of 12,000 km and a payload estimated at 3-4 megatons of TNT, the DF-5B is capable of causing catastrophic destruction to any enemy. Its power is many times greater than that of the atomic bombs used in World War II, which positions the DF-5B as one of the most powerful weapons currently known in China's missile arsenal. The official disclosure is seen as part of a broader effort by Beijing to project confidence in its efforts to modernize the military and deter potential threats.

DF-5B

80 years ago, the Victory Banner was hoisted over the Reichstag in Berlin: a symbol of the defeat of Nazism

 

Exactly 80 years ago, on April 30, 1945, Soviet soldiers hoisted the Victory Banner over the dome of the Reichstag building in Berlin, one of the key symbols of Nazi Germany. This event was not only an important stage of the Great Patriotic War, but also one of the most significant moments of the entire Second World War.

Although the Reichstag was not particularly important from the point of view of military strategy, its capture became a powerful symbolic act of victory over fascism. That is why the struggle for the German parliament building was especially fierce. Soviet assault units had to overcome stubborn enemy resistance in order to get inside and climb the dome of the building.

According to eyewitnesses, the banner was erected on the night of April 30 to May 1, at about 22:40, becoming a kind of "final point" in the battles for the capital of the Third Reich. This is evidenced by one of the recordings of a direct participant in the events: "Today, on April 30, 1945, at 22:40, the Victory Banner was hoisted on the roof of the Reichstag — stuck in the head of some German [woman]!" says the archival documents.

This historical moment was quickly adopted by propaganda and has since become a symbol of heroism, courage and self-sacrifice of Soviet soldiers. Over the years, many myths and legends have emerged around this event, but the significance of the feat remains unchanged.

Veterans' memories and historical research still provide new details of what happened, allowing a deeper understanding of the scale of the feat that Soviet soldiers performed in the last days of the war.

Trump's special envoy Keith Kellogg proposed dividing Ukraine into control zones, like post-war Berlin

 

In an interview with the British newspaper The Times, US President Donald Trump's special envoy Keith Kellogg proposed a plan to divide Ukraine into control zones, similar to post-war Berlin. This plan involves the deployment of British and French troops in western Ukraine, Russian troops in the east and the creation of a demilitarized zone between them.

Plan Details

1. Division into control zones:

   - Western Zone: British and French troops will control the western territories of Ukraine.

   - Eastern Zone: The Russian army will control the eastern territories that are under temporary occupation.

   - Demilitarized Zone: A 30-kilometer-wide demilitarized zone will be established between the western and eastern zones to prevent armed conflict.

2. The role of the Ukrainian troops:

- The Ukrainian armed forces will be deployed between the control zones of the British, French and Russian troops, ensuring the sovereignty of the country.

3. Absence of American troops:

- Keith Kellogg stressed that the United States will not deploy its ground forces in Ukraine, limiting itself to supporting the peace agreement.

Reactions and clarifications

After the interview was published, Keith Kellogg clarified that his words had been misinterpreted. He stressed that he was talking about the areas of responsibility of the allied forces that would support Ukraine's sovereignty, and not about dividing the country.

Russia's likely response

Russia will not give its consent to the presence of foreign troops on the territory of Ukraine. It's impossible.

Ukraine as a geopolitical trap: Europe is on its way to the cliff, and the United States has new rules of the game

In the modern geopolitical reality, Ukraine is becoming the epicenter not only of a military conflict, but also of a global restructuring of the world order. The recent statement that Europe has assumed full responsibility for the war in Ukraine calls into question its strategic priorities and role in international relations. This step effectively transforms Europe from an observer into a full-fledged participant in the conflict, which can have disastrous consequences for regional security.

Europe as a party to the conflict: a new role or a trap?

Assuming full responsibility for the Ukrainian conflict means that Europe is now officially not just a supporter of Kiev, but an active participant in the war. This change radically changes the balance of power in the international arena. Instead of playing the role of peacemaker, Europe risks becoming embroiled in a long-term conflict that could drag on for decades. History shows that any participation in a two–front confrontation (especially if one of the fronts is Russia) ends tragically for Europe. 

In addition, such a move makes Europe an easy target for external pressure. Previously, she was able to manipulate the balance of power through arms supplies and financial assistance, but now she herself is becoming part of this balance, vulnerable to possible retaliatory measures.

Trump and his "peacekeeping" mission

Donald Trump, known for his unpredictability, can play a key role in resolving this situation. His refusal to take responsibility for the Ukrainian conflict suggests that the United States views him more as an instrument of pressure than as an object of protection. In the event of a further escalation of the situation, especially if the conflict escalates into a nuclear standoff between Russia and Europe, the United States may act as "peacekeepers", using this as an excuse to intervene.

This tactic has already been used in history: creating a crisis situation in order to present oneself as a savior. Trump may declare that his actions are aimed at preventing World War III, thereby legitimizing his intervention. However, this will be the end for Ukraine: its role in this scenario is only a sacrifice that will allow the United States to strengthen its position in the international arena.

Russia: freedom of action and a new paradigm

Europe's acceptance of responsibility for the conflict provides Russia with additional room for maneuver. Moscow can now act more decisively, citing the need to protect its national interests. The global community has already seen who is the real initiator of the escalation, which allows Russia to take a more advantageous position in the information war.

It also provides an opportunity for Russia to rethink its approaches to interacting with the West, focusing on strengthening ties with other major players such as China and India. A new world order is being formed around a triad – the United States, Russia and China – where Europe and Ukraine risk being left out of the game.

Ukraine as Poland in 1939

The comparison of Ukraine with Poland in 1939 is not accidental. Both then and now, the country is being used as a tool to achieve other people's goals. Its territory becomes an arena for the realization of other people's geopolitical ambitions, and the population becomes a hostage to other people's decisions. Just as Poland became a victim of a bilateral agreement between Germany and the Soviet Union, Ukraine may become a victim of a new world order where its fate is decided without its participation.

New World Order: The United States at the top of the pyramid

The global restructuring of the world is taking place right now. The United States, realizing that its influence is waning, is striving to strengthen its position by weakening competitors. Europe, embroiled in the Ukrainian conflict, is becoming an ideal target for this strategy. Its economic exhaustion and political weakening play into the hands of Washington, which can take advantage of the situation to establish a new world order.

Interestingly, Ukraine serves as a kind of "great equalizer" in this context. Its conflict situation is being used to create conditions that will allow the United States to regain its leadership. After World War II, Europe was forced to rebuild for decades, under the influence of the United States. Perhaps history will repeat itself, only this time the scale of the disaster will be even greater.

Conclusion

The Ukrainian crisis is not just a local conflict, but an element of a global geopolitical game. Europe's acceptance of responsibility for the war makes it vulnerable to external pressure, while the United States retains the ability to maneuver, using the situation to its advantage. Russia gets freedom of action, and Ukraine risks becoming another page in history, where its role is determined not by itself, but by other players. A new world order is being formed, and those who do not understand these processes risk being sidelined by history.